• 33 Citations
  • 3 h-Index
1990 …2019
If you made any changes in Pure, your changes will be visible here soon.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics where Mark Weinstein is active. These topic labels come from the works of this person. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • 2 Similar Profiles
argumentation Social Sciences
educational reform Social Sciences
neurosciences Social Sciences
logic Social Sciences
complaint Social Sciences
epistemology Social Sciences
social justice Social Sciences
creativity Social Sciences

Network Recent external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Research Output 1990 2019

  • 33 Citations
  • 3 h-Index
  • 7 Article
  • 3 Review article
  • 2 Chapter

On the relevance of cognitive neuroscience for community of inquiry

Weinstein, M. & Fisherman, D., 1 Jan 2019, In : Childhood and Philosophy. 15

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Open Access
neurosciences
Emotions
emotion
community
Experimental Psychology
1 Citation (Scopus)

The periodic table and the model of emerging truth

Weinstein, M., 1 Oct 2016, In : Foundations of Chemistry. 18, 3, p. 195-212 18 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

History
Periodic Table

A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry

Weinstein, M., 1 Jan 2012, Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Springer Basel, p. 357-379 23 p.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Chemistry
Counterexample
Logic
Rejection
Lens
2 Citations (Scopus)

Arguing towards truth: The case of the periodic table

Weinstein, M., 1 May 2011, In : Argumentation. 25, 2, p. 185-197 13 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

history
argumentation
Periodic Table
History
Acceptability
3 Citations (Scopus)

A metamathematical extension of the Toulmin Agenda

Weinstein, M., 1 Dec 2006, Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Springer Netherlands, p. 49-69 21 p.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

logic
empiricism
philosophy of science
lack
science