A Clash of Methodology and Ethics in "Undercover" Social Science

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A focus of criticism on methodological and ethical grounds, the undercover or "covert" approach to fieldwork persists as a useful technique in certain settings. Questions remain about the credibility of the published findings from such work. Covert researchers nearly always protect the anonymity of their subjects and locations. Other researchers cannot validate the covert researcher's claims, yet ethical guidelines often insist that researchers demonstrate the benefits that derive from a covert study. If researchers cannot show that their studies will prove beneficial, ethical standards will weigh against the study, on the presumption that the omission of informed consent should be counterbalanced by the scientific rewards of the research. An attempt to open the results to greater peer investigation might place subjects at risk of unwanted notoriety or even danger. There does not seem to be a way that covert research can meet ethical guidelines unless we adjust our conceptions of research, ethics, or both.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)351-362
    Number of pages12
    JournalPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
    Volume33
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Sep 2003

    Fingerprint

    social science
    moral philosophy
    methodology
    research ethics
    anonymity
    credibility
    reward
    criticism
    Undercover
    Social Sciences
    Methodology
    Ethical Guidelines

    Keywords

    • Ethnography
    • Fieldwork
    • Informed consent
    • Research ethics

    Cite this

    @article{39d639f359dc4edcbac04ce1e13c367c,
    title = "A Clash of Methodology and Ethics in {"}Undercover{"} Social Science",
    abstract = "A focus of criticism on methodological and ethical grounds, the undercover or {"}covert{"} approach to fieldwork persists as a useful technique in certain settings. Questions remain about the credibility of the published findings from such work. Covert researchers nearly always protect the anonymity of their subjects and locations. Other researchers cannot validate the covert researcher's claims, yet ethical guidelines often insist that researchers demonstrate the benefits that derive from a covert study. If researchers cannot show that their studies will prove beneficial, ethical standards will weigh against the study, on the presumption that the omission of informed consent should be counterbalanced by the scientific rewards of the research. An attempt to open the results to greater peer investigation might place subjects at risk of unwanted notoriety or even danger. There does not seem to be a way that covert research can meet ethical guidelines unless we adjust our conceptions of research, ethics, or both.",
    keywords = "Ethnography, Fieldwork, Informed consent, Research ethics",
    author = "Chris Herrera",
    year = "2003",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0048393103252782",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "351--362",
    journal = "Philosophy of the Social Sciences",
    issn = "0048-3931",
    number = "3",

    }

    A Clash of Methodology and Ethics in "Undercover" Social Science. / Herrera, Chris.

    In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.09.2003, p. 351-362.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A Clash of Methodology and Ethics in "Undercover" Social Science

    AU - Herrera, Chris

    PY - 2003/9/1

    Y1 - 2003/9/1

    N2 - A focus of criticism on methodological and ethical grounds, the undercover or "covert" approach to fieldwork persists as a useful technique in certain settings. Questions remain about the credibility of the published findings from such work. Covert researchers nearly always protect the anonymity of their subjects and locations. Other researchers cannot validate the covert researcher's claims, yet ethical guidelines often insist that researchers demonstrate the benefits that derive from a covert study. If researchers cannot show that their studies will prove beneficial, ethical standards will weigh against the study, on the presumption that the omission of informed consent should be counterbalanced by the scientific rewards of the research. An attempt to open the results to greater peer investigation might place subjects at risk of unwanted notoriety or even danger. There does not seem to be a way that covert research can meet ethical guidelines unless we adjust our conceptions of research, ethics, or both.

    AB - A focus of criticism on methodological and ethical grounds, the undercover or "covert" approach to fieldwork persists as a useful technique in certain settings. Questions remain about the credibility of the published findings from such work. Covert researchers nearly always protect the anonymity of their subjects and locations. Other researchers cannot validate the covert researcher's claims, yet ethical guidelines often insist that researchers demonstrate the benefits that derive from a covert study. If researchers cannot show that their studies will prove beneficial, ethical standards will weigh against the study, on the presumption that the omission of informed consent should be counterbalanced by the scientific rewards of the research. An attempt to open the results to greater peer investigation might place subjects at risk of unwanted notoriety or even danger. There does not seem to be a way that covert research can meet ethical guidelines unless we adjust our conceptions of research, ethics, or both.

    KW - Ethnography

    KW - Fieldwork

    KW - Informed consent

    KW - Research ethics

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342479156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0048393103252782

    DO - 10.1177/0048393103252782

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 33

    SP - 351

    EP - 362

    JO - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

    JF - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

    SN - 0048-3931

    IS - 3

    ER -