A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION BETWEEN FOREIGN-BORN ADULTS AND U.S.-BORN ADULTS

Yuqi Guo, Tyrone Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This secondary data analysis of 4,341 adults examined and compared factors associated with mental health service utilization between U.S.-born adults and foreign-born adults. Logistic regression was used to investigate how participants’ mental health care use was associated with (a) predisposing factors, (b) enabling resources, and (c) perceived mental health needs. Two patterns of mental health care utilization were identified based on adults’ nativity statuses in our study. The findings show that the likelihood of foreign-born adults’ mental health care use associates positively with education, public health insurance coverage, and depression, but such likelihood associated negatively with Asian ethnicity and male gender; compared to the likelihood of U.S.-born adults’ mental health care use associates positively with education, perceived general mental health condition, depression, and drug abuse, but such likelihood associated negatively with age. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-159
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Community Psychology
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Mental Health
Delivery of Health Care
Depression
Education
Insurance Coverage
Mental Health Services
Health Insurance
Causality
Substance-Related Disorders
Public Health
Logistic Models

Cite this

@article{c8a4503a40fb4b5b8ef24acfcc5ca5f1,
title = "A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION BETWEEN FOREIGN-BORN ADULTS AND U.S.-BORN ADULTS",
abstract = "This secondary data analysis of 4,341 adults examined and compared factors associated with mental health service utilization between U.S.-born adults and foreign-born adults. Logistic regression was used to investigate how participants’ mental health care use was associated with (a) predisposing factors, (b) enabling resources, and (c) perceived mental health needs. Two patterns of mental health care utilization were identified based on adults’ nativity statuses in our study. The findings show that the likelihood of foreign-born adults’ mental health care use associates positively with education, public health insurance coverage, and depression, but such likelihood associated negatively with Asian ethnicity and male gender; compared to the likelihood of U.S.-born adults’ mental health care use associates positively with education, perceived general mental health condition, depression, and drug abuse, but such likelihood associated negatively with age. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.",
author = "Yuqi Guo and Tyrone Cheng",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jcop.21839",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "145--159",
journal = "Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0090-4392",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION BETWEEN FOREIGN-BORN ADULTS AND U.S.-BORN ADULTS. / Guo, Yuqi; Cheng, Tyrone.

In: Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 145-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION BETWEEN FOREIGN-BORN ADULTS AND U.S.-BORN ADULTS

AU - Guo, Yuqi

AU - Cheng, Tyrone

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - This secondary data analysis of 4,341 adults examined and compared factors associated with mental health service utilization between U.S.-born adults and foreign-born adults. Logistic regression was used to investigate how participants’ mental health care use was associated with (a) predisposing factors, (b) enabling resources, and (c) perceived mental health needs. Two patterns of mental health care utilization were identified based on adults’ nativity statuses in our study. The findings show that the likelihood of foreign-born adults’ mental health care use associates positively with education, public health insurance coverage, and depression, but such likelihood associated negatively with Asian ethnicity and male gender; compared to the likelihood of U.S.-born adults’ mental health care use associates positively with education, perceived general mental health condition, depression, and drug abuse, but such likelihood associated negatively with age. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

AB - This secondary data analysis of 4,341 adults examined and compared factors associated with mental health service utilization between U.S.-born adults and foreign-born adults. Logistic regression was used to investigate how participants’ mental health care use was associated with (a) predisposing factors, (b) enabling resources, and (c) perceived mental health needs. Two patterns of mental health care utilization were identified based on adults’ nativity statuses in our study. The findings show that the likelihood of foreign-born adults’ mental health care use associates positively with education, public health insurance coverage, and depression, but such likelihood associated negatively with Asian ethnicity and male gender; compared to the likelihood of U.S.-born adults’ mental health care use associates positively with education, perceived general mental health condition, depression, and drug abuse, but such likelihood associated negatively with age. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011906787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jcop.21839

DO - 10.1002/jcop.21839

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011906787

VL - 45

SP - 145

EP - 159

JO - Journal of Community Psychology

JF - Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0090-4392

IS - 2

ER -