A comparison of three scales for assessing social functioning in primary care

M. M. Weissman, M. Olfson, M. J. Gameroff, A. Feder, Milton Fuentes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Assessment of functional status is increasingly important in clinical trials and outcome research. Although several scales for assessing functioning are widely used, they vary in coverage, and direct comparisons among them are rare. Comparative information is useful in guiding selection of appropriate scales for research applications. Method: Results from three scales that measure functioning - the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report, and the Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale - were compared in a consecutively selected sample of 211 patients coming to primary care. Patients also received psychiatric assessments. Results: All three scales were acceptable to patients, showed few significant correlations with demographic variables, and were able to differentiate psychiatrically ill and well patients. Correlations among scales, even among scale items that assessed similar domains of functioning, were modest. Conclusions: Although all three scales are presumed to assess functional status, their item content and coverage differ. Selection of a scale requires a review of the scale items and consideration of research priorities and the characteristics of the study group. If functional status is a critical outcome measure, use of more than one scale may be necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)460-466
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume158
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 Mar 2001

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Social Adjustment
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Health Surveys
Research
Self Report
Psychiatry
Demography
Clinical Trials

Cite this

Weissman, M. M. ; Olfson, M. ; Gameroff, M. J. ; Feder, A. ; Fuentes, Milton. / A comparison of three scales for assessing social functioning in primary care. In: American Journal of Psychiatry. 2001 ; Vol. 158, No. 3. pp. 460-466.
@article{881dfa182847428aaf69d6537857baf8,
title = "A comparison of three scales for assessing social functioning in primary care",
abstract = "Objective: Assessment of functional status is increasingly important in clinical trials and outcome research. Although several scales for assessing functioning are widely used, they vary in coverage, and direct comparisons among them are rare. Comparative information is useful in guiding selection of appropriate scales for research applications. Method: Results from three scales that measure functioning - the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report, and the Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale - were compared in a consecutively selected sample of 211 patients coming to primary care. Patients also received psychiatric assessments. Results: All three scales were acceptable to patients, showed few significant correlations with demographic variables, and were able to differentiate psychiatrically ill and well patients. Correlations among scales, even among scale items that assessed similar domains of functioning, were modest. Conclusions: Although all three scales are presumed to assess functional status, their item content and coverage differ. Selection of a scale requires a review of the scale items and consideration of research priorities and the characteristics of the study group. If functional status is a critical outcome measure, use of more than one scale may be necessary.",
author = "Weissman, {M. M.} and M. Olfson and Gameroff, {M. J.} and A. Feder and Milton Fuentes",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.460",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
pages = "460--466",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "3",

}

A comparison of three scales for assessing social functioning in primary care. / Weissman, M. M.; Olfson, M.; Gameroff, M. J.; Feder, A.; Fuentes, Milton.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 158, No. 3, 21.03.2001, p. 460-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of three scales for assessing social functioning in primary care

AU - Weissman, M. M.

AU - Olfson, M.

AU - Gameroff, M. J.

AU - Feder, A.

AU - Fuentes, Milton

PY - 2001/3/21

Y1 - 2001/3/21

N2 - Objective: Assessment of functional status is increasingly important in clinical trials and outcome research. Although several scales for assessing functioning are widely used, they vary in coverage, and direct comparisons among them are rare. Comparative information is useful in guiding selection of appropriate scales for research applications. Method: Results from three scales that measure functioning - the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report, and the Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale - were compared in a consecutively selected sample of 211 patients coming to primary care. Patients also received psychiatric assessments. Results: All three scales were acceptable to patients, showed few significant correlations with demographic variables, and were able to differentiate psychiatrically ill and well patients. Correlations among scales, even among scale items that assessed similar domains of functioning, were modest. Conclusions: Although all three scales are presumed to assess functional status, their item content and coverage differ. Selection of a scale requires a review of the scale items and consideration of research priorities and the characteristics of the study group. If functional status is a critical outcome measure, use of more than one scale may be necessary.

AB - Objective: Assessment of functional status is increasingly important in clinical trials and outcome research. Although several scales for assessing functioning are widely used, they vary in coverage, and direct comparisons among them are rare. Comparative information is useful in guiding selection of appropriate scales for research applications. Method: Results from three scales that measure functioning - the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report, and the Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale - were compared in a consecutively selected sample of 211 patients coming to primary care. Patients also received psychiatric assessments. Results: All three scales were acceptable to patients, showed few significant correlations with demographic variables, and were able to differentiate psychiatrically ill and well patients. Correlations among scales, even among scale items that assessed similar domains of functioning, were modest. Conclusions: Although all three scales are presumed to assess functional status, their item content and coverage differ. Selection of a scale requires a review of the scale items and consideration of research priorities and the characteristics of the study group. If functional status is a critical outcome measure, use of more than one scale may be necessary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035092025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.460

DO - 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.460

M3 - Article

VL - 158

SP - 460

EP - 466

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 3

ER -