TY - JOUR
T1 - A Content Analysis of LGBT Research in Top Family Journals 2000-2015
AU - van Eeden-Moorefield, Brad
AU - Few-Demo, April L.
AU - Benson, Kristen
AU - Bible, Jacqueline
AU - Lummer, Shannon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - The past decades have witnessed some of the most prolific changes in rights and experiences for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) individuals and their families. Research during this period also witnessed a significant increase in the study of these changes. The current content analysis systematically reviewed all LGBT-related articles published in top-ranked, general family science journals from 2000 to 2015 to gauge the state of this growing field. Specifically, basic descriptives, theoretical foundations, methodological plurality, and inclusivity were examined. Results revealed that less than 3% of articles published were LGBT-related, most were atheoretical and infrequently included variables unique to this population (e.g., outness, discrimination), used purposive cross-sectional samples, focused most on lesbian and/or gay couples, and included primarily White and middle-class individuals in samples. Areas of strengths and future opportunities are discussed.
AB - The past decades have witnessed some of the most prolific changes in rights and experiences for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) individuals and their families. Research during this period also witnessed a significant increase in the study of these changes. The current content analysis systematically reviewed all LGBT-related articles published in top-ranked, general family science journals from 2000 to 2015 to gauge the state of this growing field. Specifically, basic descriptives, theoretical foundations, methodological plurality, and inclusivity were examined. Results revealed that less than 3% of articles published were LGBT-related, most were atheoretical and infrequently included variables unique to this population (e.g., outness, discrimination), used purposive cross-sectional samples, focused most on lesbian and/or gay couples, and included primarily White and middle-class individuals in samples. Areas of strengths and future opportunities are discussed.
KW - LGBT
KW - content analysis
KW - families
KW - methods
KW - theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041559944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0192513X17710284
DO - 10.1177/0192513X17710284
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85041559944
SN - 0192-513X
VL - 39
SP - 1374
EP - 1395
JO - Journal of Family Issues
JF - Journal of Family Issues
IS - 5
ER -