A marketing paradox

Mark Hill, John Mcginnis, Jane Cromartie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain and discuss a paradoxical tension in the practice of marketing and the consequent dilemmas posed for practitioners in general and planners in particular. Design-methodology-approach A “Viewpoint” contribution, with implicit permission to “think aloud.” Informed opinion and logical argument are in this case founded on but not exclusively derived from the existing research-based marketing literature, plus selected transfer of principles from other disciplines. Findings The paradox is that, by concentrating on the contribution of accepted theory and principles to practice, in fact intellectual and conceptual progress might be hindered. A way out of this dilemma is to shift the focus from marketing-as-content (doing) to marketing-as-questioning (thinking). A new working definition emphasizes the value of this focus and the benefits of equal participation in the process by both academics and practitioners. Practical implications A route map is offered for productive collaboration across the much-discussed academic-practitioner gap, which should lead to mitigation of the constraining (hindering) effect of the conventional wisdom and the way it is applied to strategy. Originality-value The paper presents a point of view, to stimulate lateral thinking and alternative positions. It shifts the focus from “what” to “how” and “why” and exhorts academics and practitioners to move in the same direction together.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)652-661
Number of pages10
JournalMarketing Intelligence & Planning
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 30 Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Paradox
Marketing
Mitigation
Participation
Wisdom
Logic
Design methodology

Keywords

  • Brands
  • Internet

Cite this

Hill, Mark ; Mcginnis, John ; Cromartie, Jane. / A marketing paradox. In: Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2007 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 652-661.
@article{a3a4ce211382461fbe17a0a772d84d37,
title = "A marketing paradox",
abstract = "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain and discuss a paradoxical tension in the practice of marketing and the consequent dilemmas posed for practitioners in general and planners in particular. Design-methodology-approach A “Viewpoint” contribution, with implicit permission to “think aloud.” Informed opinion and logical argument are in this case founded on but not exclusively derived from the existing research-based marketing literature, plus selected transfer of principles from other disciplines. Findings The paradox is that, by concentrating on the contribution of accepted theory and principles to practice, in fact intellectual and conceptual progress might be hindered. A way out of this dilemma is to shift the focus from marketing-as-content (doing) to marketing-as-questioning (thinking). A new working definition emphasizes the value of this focus and the benefits of equal participation in the process by both academics and practitioners. Practical implications A route map is offered for productive collaboration across the much-discussed academic-practitioner gap, which should lead to mitigation of the constraining (hindering) effect of the conventional wisdom and the way it is applied to strategy. Originality-value The paper presents a point of view, to stimulate lateral thinking and alternative positions. It shifts the focus from “what” to “how” and “why” and exhorts academics and practitioners to move in the same direction together.",
keywords = "Brands, Internet",
author = "Mark Hill and John Mcginnis and Jane Cromartie",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1108/02634500710834142",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "652--661",
journal = "Marketing Intelligence and Planning",
issn = "0263-4503",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

Hill, M, Mcginnis, J & Cromartie, J 2007, 'A marketing paradox', Marketing Intelligence & Planning, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500710834142

A marketing paradox. / Hill, Mark; Mcginnis, John; Cromartie, Jane.

In: Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 25, No. 7, 30.10.2007, p. 652-661.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A marketing paradox

AU - Hill, Mark

AU - Mcginnis, John

AU - Cromartie, Jane

PY - 2007/10/30

Y1 - 2007/10/30

N2 - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain and discuss a paradoxical tension in the practice of marketing and the consequent dilemmas posed for practitioners in general and planners in particular. Design-methodology-approach A “Viewpoint” contribution, with implicit permission to “think aloud.” Informed opinion and logical argument are in this case founded on but not exclusively derived from the existing research-based marketing literature, plus selected transfer of principles from other disciplines. Findings The paradox is that, by concentrating on the contribution of accepted theory and principles to practice, in fact intellectual and conceptual progress might be hindered. A way out of this dilemma is to shift the focus from marketing-as-content (doing) to marketing-as-questioning (thinking). A new working definition emphasizes the value of this focus and the benefits of equal participation in the process by both academics and practitioners. Practical implications A route map is offered for productive collaboration across the much-discussed academic-practitioner gap, which should lead to mitigation of the constraining (hindering) effect of the conventional wisdom and the way it is applied to strategy. Originality-value The paper presents a point of view, to stimulate lateral thinking and alternative positions. It shifts the focus from “what” to “how” and “why” and exhorts academics and practitioners to move in the same direction together.

AB - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain and discuss a paradoxical tension in the practice of marketing and the consequent dilemmas posed for practitioners in general and planners in particular. Design-methodology-approach A “Viewpoint” contribution, with implicit permission to “think aloud.” Informed opinion and logical argument are in this case founded on but not exclusively derived from the existing research-based marketing literature, plus selected transfer of principles from other disciplines. Findings The paradox is that, by concentrating on the contribution of accepted theory and principles to practice, in fact intellectual and conceptual progress might be hindered. A way out of this dilemma is to shift the focus from marketing-as-content (doing) to marketing-as-questioning (thinking). A new working definition emphasizes the value of this focus and the benefits of equal participation in the process by both academics and practitioners. Practical implications A route map is offered for productive collaboration across the much-discussed academic-practitioner gap, which should lead to mitigation of the constraining (hindering) effect of the conventional wisdom and the way it is applied to strategy. Originality-value The paper presents a point of view, to stimulate lateral thinking and alternative positions. It shifts the focus from “what” to “how” and “why” and exhorts academics and practitioners to move in the same direction together.

KW - Brands

KW - Internet

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35548994138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/02634500710834142

DO - 10.1108/02634500710834142

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 652

EP - 661

JO - Marketing Intelligence and Planning

JF - Marketing Intelligence and Planning

SN - 0263-4503

IS - 7

ER -