A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring

Kimberly E. O'Brien, Andrew Biga, Stacey Kessler, Tammy D. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This meta-analysis investigates gender differences in mentor- and protégé-reported experience in mentorships as well as career and psychosocial benefits. There are no gender differences in experience as a protégé or protégé receipt of career development, but male protégés report receiving less psychosocial support than female protégés. Furthermore, males are more likely to serve as mentors than females and report giving more career development than female mentors. Conversely, female mentors report providing more psychosocial support than male mentors. In most cases, effect sizes are small and heterogeneous, providing important implications for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-554
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Management
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Mentoring
Gender differences
Mentor
Career development
Effect size
Meta-analysis

Keywords

  • Mentor
  • Mentoring functions
  • Protégé

Cite this

O'Brien, Kimberly E. ; Biga, Andrew ; Kessler, Stacey ; Allen, Tammy D. / A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring. In: Journal of Management. 2010 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 537-554.
@article{dc8a21748efb4880ba1716dcde8b2b77,
title = "A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring",
abstract = "This meta-analysis investigates gender differences in mentor- and prot{\'e}g{\'e}-reported experience in mentorships as well as career and psychosocial benefits. There are no gender differences in experience as a prot{\'e}g{\'e} or prot{\'e}g{\'e} receipt of career development, but male prot{\'e}g{\'e}s report receiving less psychosocial support than female prot{\'e}g{\'e}s. Furthermore, males are more likely to serve as mentors than females and report giving more career development than female mentors. Conversely, female mentors report providing more psychosocial support than male mentors. In most cases, effect sizes are small and heterogeneous, providing important implications for future research.",
keywords = "Mentor, Mentoring functions, Prot{\'e}g{\'e}",
author = "O'Brien, {Kimberly E.} and Andrew Biga and Stacey Kessler and Allen, {Tammy D.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0149206308318619",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "537--554",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring. / O'Brien, Kimberly E.; Biga, Andrew; Kessler, Stacey; Allen, Tammy D.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.03.2010, p. 537-554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring

AU - O'Brien, Kimberly E.

AU - Biga, Andrew

AU - Kessler, Stacey

AU - Allen, Tammy D.

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - This meta-analysis investigates gender differences in mentor- and protégé-reported experience in mentorships as well as career and psychosocial benefits. There are no gender differences in experience as a protégé or protégé receipt of career development, but male protégés report receiving less psychosocial support than female protégés. Furthermore, males are more likely to serve as mentors than females and report giving more career development than female mentors. Conversely, female mentors report providing more psychosocial support than male mentors. In most cases, effect sizes are small and heterogeneous, providing important implications for future research.

AB - This meta-analysis investigates gender differences in mentor- and protégé-reported experience in mentorships as well as career and psychosocial benefits. There are no gender differences in experience as a protégé or protégé receipt of career development, but male protégés report receiving less psychosocial support than female protégés. Furthermore, males are more likely to serve as mentors than females and report giving more career development than female mentors. Conversely, female mentors report providing more psychosocial support than male mentors. In most cases, effect sizes are small and heterogeneous, providing important implications for future research.

KW - Mentor

KW - Mentoring functions

KW - Protégé

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76249129390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0149206308318619

DO - 10.1177/0149206308318619

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 537

EP - 554

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 2

ER -