A metamathematical extension of the Toulmin Agenda

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Toulmin is famously seen as a progenitor of informal logic and is first among many who seek to move the study of argument away from its roots in formal, especially mathematical, logic and towards its place in inquiry. Toulmin's efforts, however, have been criticized for lack of foundation. I will argue that although Toulmin is correct in rejecting mathematical logic as a theory of argument and logical empiricism as the philosophy of science, there is a significant role for metamathematics in the normative foundation of argument. The core is a metamathematical account of truth and entailment based on physical science rather than arithmetic.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationArguing on the Toulmin Model
Subtitle of host publicationNew Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Pages49-69
Number of pages21
ISBN (Print)1402049374, 9781402049378
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2006

Fingerprint

logic
empiricism
philosophy of science
lack
science
Mathematical Logic
Agenda
Metamathematics
Theory of Argument
Logical Empiricism
Entailment
Informal Logic
Philosophy of Science
Physical Science

Keywords

  • argument
  • backing
  • entailment
  • epistemology
  • formal logic
  • inquiry
  • metamathematics
  • philosophy of science
  • Stephen E. Toulmin
  • truth
  • warrant

Cite this

Weinstein, M. (2006). A metamathematical extension of the Toulmin Agenda. In Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (pp. 49-69). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_5
Weinstein, Mark. / A metamathematical extension of the Toulmin Agenda. Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Springer Netherlands, 2006. pp. 49-69
@inbook{fc140a41308a42eeabaf1fedff7decfc,
title = "A metamathematical extension of the Toulmin Agenda",
abstract = "Toulmin is famously seen as a progenitor of informal logic and is first among many who seek to move the study of argument away from its roots in formal, especially mathematical, logic and towards its place in inquiry. Toulmin's efforts, however, have been criticized for lack of foundation. I will argue that although Toulmin is correct in rejecting mathematical logic as a theory of argument and logical empiricism as the philosophy of science, there is a significant role for metamathematics in the normative foundation of argument. The core is a metamathematical account of truth and entailment based on physical science rather than arithmetic.",
keywords = "argument, backing, entailment, epistemology, formal logic, inquiry, metamathematics, philosophy of science, Stephen E. Toulmin, truth, warrant",
author = "Mark Weinstein",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "1402049374",
pages = "49--69",
booktitle = "Arguing on the Toulmin Model",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

Weinstein, M 2006, A metamathematical extension of the Toulmin Agenda. in Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Springer Netherlands, pp. 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_5

A metamathematical extension of the Toulmin Agenda. / Weinstein, Mark.

Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Springer Netherlands, 2006. p. 49-69.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - A metamathematical extension of the Toulmin Agenda

AU - Weinstein, Mark

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Toulmin is famously seen as a progenitor of informal logic and is first among many who seek to move the study of argument away from its roots in formal, especially mathematical, logic and towards its place in inquiry. Toulmin's efforts, however, have been criticized for lack of foundation. I will argue that although Toulmin is correct in rejecting mathematical logic as a theory of argument and logical empiricism as the philosophy of science, there is a significant role for metamathematics in the normative foundation of argument. The core is a metamathematical account of truth and entailment based on physical science rather than arithmetic.

AB - Toulmin is famously seen as a progenitor of informal logic and is first among many who seek to move the study of argument away from its roots in formal, especially mathematical, logic and towards its place in inquiry. Toulmin's efforts, however, have been criticized for lack of foundation. I will argue that although Toulmin is correct in rejecting mathematical logic as a theory of argument and logical empiricism as the philosophy of science, there is a significant role for metamathematics in the normative foundation of argument. The core is a metamathematical account of truth and entailment based on physical science rather than arithmetic.

KW - argument

KW - backing

KW - entailment

KW - epistemology

KW - formal logic

KW - inquiry

KW - metamathematics

KW - philosophy of science

KW - Stephen E. Toulmin

KW - truth

KW - warrant

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955823788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_5

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 1402049374

SN - 9781402049378

SP - 49

EP - 69

BT - Arguing on the Toulmin Model

PB - Springer Netherlands

ER -

Weinstein M. A metamathematical extension of the Toulmin Agenda. In Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Springer Netherlands. 2006. p. 49-69 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_5