A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The paper looks at the logic of scientific inquiry through the lens of physical chemistry in order to offer an account of the function of counter-examples to generalizations in scientific inquiry. A metamathematical model of emerging truth (MET) offers an image of truthlikeness in terms of model progressiveness, which supports an analysis of warrant strength that is connected with adaptive logic. TheMET is exemplified by the history of the Periodic Table and examples from the history of chemistry are included by way of illustration. The discussion supports a rethinking of the relation of counter-examples to generalizations in terms of relative warrant strength challenging the standard view that calls for the rejection of a generalization in light of available counter-evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAround and Beyond the Square of Opposition
PublisherSpringer Basel
Pages357-379
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9783034803793
ISBN (Print)9783034803786
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Chemistry
Counterexample
Logic
Rejection
Lens
Table
Model
Generalization
History
Truth
Standards
Evidence

Keywords

  • Adaptive logic
  • Argument
  • Chemistry
  • Inquiry
  • Metamathematics
  • Periodic Table
  • Science
  • Square of Opposition
  • Truth

Cite this

Weinstein, M. (2012). A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry. In Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition (pp. 357-379). Springer Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_24
Weinstein, Mark. / A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry. Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Springer Basel, 2012. pp. 357-379
@inbook{c837204879414e2e8bf08c7558ed0696,
title = "A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry",
abstract = "The paper looks at the logic of scientific inquiry through the lens of physical chemistry in order to offer an account of the function of counter-examples to generalizations in scientific inquiry. A metamathematical model of emerging truth (MET) offers an image of truthlikeness in terms of model progressiveness, which supports an analysis of warrant strength that is connected with adaptive logic. TheMET is exemplified by the history of the Periodic Table and examples from the history of chemistry are included by way of illustration. The discussion supports a rethinking of the relation of counter-examples to generalizations in terms of relative warrant strength challenging the standard view that calls for the rejection of a generalization in light of available counter-evidence.",
keywords = "Adaptive logic, Argument, Chemistry, Inquiry, Metamathematics, Periodic Table, Science, Square of Opposition, Truth",
author = "Mark Weinstein",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_24",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783034803786",
pages = "357--379",
booktitle = "Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition",
publisher = "Springer Basel",

}

Weinstein, M 2012, A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry. in Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Springer Basel, pp. 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_24

A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry. / Weinstein, Mark.

Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Springer Basel, 2012. p. 357-379.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry

AU - Weinstein, Mark

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - The paper looks at the logic of scientific inquiry through the lens of physical chemistry in order to offer an account of the function of counter-examples to generalizations in scientific inquiry. A metamathematical model of emerging truth (MET) offers an image of truthlikeness in terms of model progressiveness, which supports an analysis of warrant strength that is connected with adaptive logic. TheMET is exemplified by the history of the Periodic Table and examples from the history of chemistry are included by way of illustration. The discussion supports a rethinking of the relation of counter-examples to generalizations in terms of relative warrant strength challenging the standard view that calls for the rejection of a generalization in light of available counter-evidence.

AB - The paper looks at the logic of scientific inquiry through the lens of physical chemistry in order to offer an account of the function of counter-examples to generalizations in scientific inquiry. A metamathematical model of emerging truth (MET) offers an image of truthlikeness in terms of model progressiveness, which supports an analysis of warrant strength that is connected with adaptive logic. TheMET is exemplified by the history of the Periodic Table and examples from the history of chemistry are included by way of illustration. The discussion supports a rethinking of the relation of counter-examples to generalizations in terms of relative warrant strength challenging the standard view that calls for the rejection of a generalization in light of available counter-evidence.

KW - Adaptive logic

KW - Argument

KW - Chemistry

KW - Inquiry

KW - Metamathematics

KW - Periodic Table

KW - Science

KW - Square of Opposition

KW - Truth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029566562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_24

DO - 10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_24

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85029566562

SN - 9783034803786

SP - 357

EP - 379

BT - Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition

PB - Springer Basel

ER -

Weinstein M. A metamathematical model for A/O opposition in scientific inquiry. In Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Springer Basel. 2012. p. 357-379 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_24