A truth that's told with bad intent

An ERP study of deception

Ricardo E. Carrión, Julian Keenan, Natalie Sebanz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Human social cognition critically relies on the ability to deceive others. However, the cognitive and neural underpinnings of deception are still poorly understood. Why does lying place increased demands on cognitive control? The present study investigated whether cognitive control processes during deception are recruited due to the need to inhibit a tendency to state the truth, or reflect deceptive intent more generally. We engaged participants in a face-to-face interaction game and examined event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while participants lied and told the truth with or without deceptive intention. The same medial frontal negative deflection (N450) occurred when participants lied and when they told the truth with deceptive intent. This suggests that the main challenge of lying is not to inhibit a tendency to state the truth. Rather, the challenge is to handle the cognitive conflict resulting from the need to keep others' mental states in mind while deceiving them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-110
Number of pages6
JournalCognition
Volume114
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Deception
Evoked Potentials
brain
Aptitude
event
Brain
Cognition
control process
social cognition
Event-related Brain Potentials
ability
interaction
Conflict (Psychology)
Cognitive Control

Keywords

  • Cognitive control
  • Deception
  • Event-related potentials
  • Mentalizing
  • Social interaction

Cite this

Carrión, Ricardo E. ; Keenan, Julian ; Sebanz, Natalie. / A truth that's told with bad intent : An ERP study of deception. In: Cognition. 2010 ; Vol. 114, No. 1. pp. 105-110.
@article{2bb8043b8c7f4d11bb35ea40591eda21,
title = "A truth that's told with bad intent: An ERP study of deception",
abstract = "Human social cognition critically relies on the ability to deceive others. However, the cognitive and neural underpinnings of deception are still poorly understood. Why does lying place increased demands on cognitive control? The present study investigated whether cognitive control processes during deception are recruited due to the need to inhibit a tendency to state the truth, or reflect deceptive intent more generally. We engaged participants in a face-to-face interaction game and examined event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while participants lied and told the truth with or without deceptive intention. The same medial frontal negative deflection (N450) occurred when participants lied and when they told the truth with deceptive intent. This suggests that the main challenge of lying is not to inhibit a tendency to state the truth. Rather, the challenge is to handle the cognitive conflict resulting from the need to keep others' mental states in mind while deceiving them.",
keywords = "Cognitive control, Deception, Event-related potentials, Mentalizing, Social interaction",
author = "Carri{\'o}n, {Ricardo E.} and Julian Keenan and Natalie Sebanz",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.014",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "105--110",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

A truth that's told with bad intent : An ERP study of deception. / Carrión, Ricardo E.; Keenan, Julian; Sebanz, Natalie.

In: Cognition, Vol. 114, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 105-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A truth that's told with bad intent

T2 - An ERP study of deception

AU - Carrión, Ricardo E.

AU - Keenan, Julian

AU - Sebanz, Natalie

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Human social cognition critically relies on the ability to deceive others. However, the cognitive and neural underpinnings of deception are still poorly understood. Why does lying place increased demands on cognitive control? The present study investigated whether cognitive control processes during deception are recruited due to the need to inhibit a tendency to state the truth, or reflect deceptive intent more generally. We engaged participants in a face-to-face interaction game and examined event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while participants lied and told the truth with or without deceptive intention. The same medial frontal negative deflection (N450) occurred when participants lied and when they told the truth with deceptive intent. This suggests that the main challenge of lying is not to inhibit a tendency to state the truth. Rather, the challenge is to handle the cognitive conflict resulting from the need to keep others' mental states in mind while deceiving them.

AB - Human social cognition critically relies on the ability to deceive others. However, the cognitive and neural underpinnings of deception are still poorly understood. Why does lying place increased demands on cognitive control? The present study investigated whether cognitive control processes during deception are recruited due to the need to inhibit a tendency to state the truth, or reflect deceptive intent more generally. We engaged participants in a face-to-face interaction game and examined event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while participants lied and told the truth with or without deceptive intention. The same medial frontal negative deflection (N450) occurred when participants lied and when they told the truth with deceptive intent. This suggests that the main challenge of lying is not to inhibit a tendency to state the truth. Rather, the challenge is to handle the cognitive conflict resulting from the need to keep others' mental states in mind while deceiving them.

KW - Cognitive control

KW - Deception

KW - Event-related potentials

KW - Mentalizing

KW - Social interaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71849115044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.014

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.014

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 105

EP - 110

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 1

ER -