Actantial analysis: Greimas's structural approach to the analysis of self-narratives

Yong Wang, Carl W. Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper introduces a formal procedure for analyzing narratives that was developed by the French/Lithuanian structuralist, A. J. Greimas. The focus is on demonstrating the utility of Greimas's ideas for analyzing one aspect of personal narratives: identity-construction. Reconstructing the basic actantial. structure from self-narratives is shown to provide cues to power differentials among actants as perceived by the narrator. Distinguishing narrated events along conflict versus communication axes helps the analyst determine whether an experiential or a discursive domain is of primacy for the narrator. Moreover, investigation of communicative outcomes can be used to validate (or invalidate) findings on power relations. Analyses of narrative plots may afford insights into how people engage objects with cultural valuations within the various social contexts recounted in narrative data. Finally, Greimas's theory of modalities can be used to differentiate among these plots within narrative trajectories. This approach to narrative analysis differs from more traditional "denarrativization" and "renarrativization" approaches in that it affords the researcher a language (or discursive structure) according to which the narrator's, not the analyst's, understandings of character relations and reality conditions become the subject matter of one's research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-74
Number of pages24
JournalNarrative Inquiry
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2005

Fingerprint

structural analysis
narrative
A. J. Greimas
Structural Approach
Narrator
event
communication
language
Plot
Discursive

Keywords

  • Actantial model
  • Identity
  • Modality
  • Narrative
  • Self

Cite this

@article{4b46370fdcb9460485c29c6b379b8e1f,
title = "Actantial analysis: Greimas's structural approach to the analysis of self-narratives",
abstract = "This paper introduces a formal procedure for analyzing narratives that was developed by the French/Lithuanian structuralist, A. J. Greimas. The focus is on demonstrating the utility of Greimas's ideas for analyzing one aspect of personal narratives: identity-construction. Reconstructing the basic actantial. structure from self-narratives is shown to provide cues to power differentials among actants as perceived by the narrator. Distinguishing narrated events along conflict versus communication axes helps the analyst determine whether an experiential or a discursive domain is of primacy for the narrator. Moreover, investigation of communicative outcomes can be used to validate (or invalidate) findings on power relations. Analyses of narrative plots may afford insights into how people engage objects with cultural valuations within the various social contexts recounted in narrative data. Finally, Greimas's theory of modalities can be used to differentiate among these plots within narrative trajectories. This approach to narrative analysis differs from more traditional {"}denarrativization{"} and {"}renarrativization{"} approaches in that it affords the researcher a language (or discursive structure) according to which the narrator's, not the analyst's, understandings of character relations and reality conditions become the subject matter of one's research.",
keywords = "Actantial model, Identity, Modality, Narrative, Self",
author = "Yong Wang and Roberts, {Carl W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/ni.15.1.04wan",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "51--74",
journal = "Narrative Inquiry",
issn = "1387-6740",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

Actantial analysis : Greimas's structural approach to the analysis of self-narratives. / Wang, Yong; Roberts, Carl W.

In: Narrative Inquiry, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.12.2005, p. 51-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Actantial analysis

T2 - Greimas's structural approach to the analysis of self-narratives

AU - Wang, Yong

AU - Roberts, Carl W.

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - This paper introduces a formal procedure for analyzing narratives that was developed by the French/Lithuanian structuralist, A. J. Greimas. The focus is on demonstrating the utility of Greimas's ideas for analyzing one aspect of personal narratives: identity-construction. Reconstructing the basic actantial. structure from self-narratives is shown to provide cues to power differentials among actants as perceived by the narrator. Distinguishing narrated events along conflict versus communication axes helps the analyst determine whether an experiential or a discursive domain is of primacy for the narrator. Moreover, investigation of communicative outcomes can be used to validate (or invalidate) findings on power relations. Analyses of narrative plots may afford insights into how people engage objects with cultural valuations within the various social contexts recounted in narrative data. Finally, Greimas's theory of modalities can be used to differentiate among these plots within narrative trajectories. This approach to narrative analysis differs from more traditional "denarrativization" and "renarrativization" approaches in that it affords the researcher a language (or discursive structure) according to which the narrator's, not the analyst's, understandings of character relations and reality conditions become the subject matter of one's research.

AB - This paper introduces a formal procedure for analyzing narratives that was developed by the French/Lithuanian structuralist, A. J. Greimas. The focus is on demonstrating the utility of Greimas's ideas for analyzing one aspect of personal narratives: identity-construction. Reconstructing the basic actantial. structure from self-narratives is shown to provide cues to power differentials among actants as perceived by the narrator. Distinguishing narrated events along conflict versus communication axes helps the analyst determine whether an experiential or a discursive domain is of primacy for the narrator. Moreover, investigation of communicative outcomes can be used to validate (or invalidate) findings on power relations. Analyses of narrative plots may afford insights into how people engage objects with cultural valuations within the various social contexts recounted in narrative data. Finally, Greimas's theory of modalities can be used to differentiate among these plots within narrative trajectories. This approach to narrative analysis differs from more traditional "denarrativization" and "renarrativization" approaches in that it affords the researcher a language (or discursive structure) according to which the narrator's, not the analyst's, understandings of character relations and reality conditions become the subject matter of one's research.

KW - Actantial model

KW - Identity

KW - Modality

KW - Narrative

KW - Self

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646745521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/ni.15.1.04wan

DO - 10.1075/ni.15.1.04wan

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33646745521

VL - 15

SP - 51

EP - 74

JO - Narrative Inquiry

JF - Narrative Inquiry

SN - 1387-6740

IS - 1

ER -