Adaptive, generative, and transformative learning in project teams

Valerie Sessa, Manuel London, Christopher Pingor, Beyza Gullu, Juhi Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze a framework of team learning that includes three learning processes (adaptive, generative, and transformative), factors that stimulate these processes, and consequences of them. The variables provided a field study of the model. Design/methodology/approach: In the field study, 69 project teams of 3 to 11 students and their instructors responded to surveys. Findings: Positive learning stimuli were related to adaptive and generative learning processes, while negative stimuli were related to transformative learning processes. Learning processes were related to individual student learning outcomes. In addition, adaptive and generative learning processes were positively related to team and instructor ratings of outcome quality, while transformative learning was negatively related to team ratings of outcome quality. Research limitations/implications: The results were subject to the following limitations: cross-sectional design, mostly self-report measures, and the lack of control endemic to field research. As such, this study is viewed as an initial test of the team-learning model in a field setting. Additional research, including longitudinal designs and experimental designs, are called for. Practical implications: This study adds to the growing literature on group learning. Educators and managers need to be aware that there are different kinds of learning processes in which groups can engage and that these are stimulated to occur differently and have a different impact on outcomes. Originality/value: Team learning is rarely assessed directly as a construct in its own right and there is a lack of empirical support delineating causes and consequences of team learning. This field study is a first step in this direction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-167
Number of pages22
JournalTeam Performance Management
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Students
Design of experiments
Managers
Learning process
Transformative learning
Adaptive learning
Project teams
Team learning
Field study
Rating
Field research
Factors
Longitudinal research
Design methodology
Learning model
Student learning
Group learning
Self-report
Learning outcomes
Experimental design

Keywords

  • Adaptability
  • Learning methods
  • Learning processes
  • Project teams
  • Team learning

Cite this

Sessa, Valerie ; London, Manuel ; Pingor, Christopher ; Gullu, Beyza ; Patel, Juhi. / Adaptive, generative, and transformative learning in project teams. In: Team Performance Management. 2011 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 146-167.
@article{a746d64259f543fb97ce07934d33b019,
title = "Adaptive, generative, and transformative learning in project teams",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze a framework of team learning that includes three learning processes (adaptive, generative, and transformative), factors that stimulate these processes, and consequences of them. The variables provided a field study of the model. Design/methodology/approach: In the field study, 69 project teams of 3 to 11 students and their instructors responded to surveys. Findings: Positive learning stimuli were related to adaptive and generative learning processes, while negative stimuli were related to transformative learning processes. Learning processes were related to individual student learning outcomes. In addition, adaptive and generative learning processes were positively related to team and instructor ratings of outcome quality, while transformative learning was negatively related to team ratings of outcome quality. Research limitations/implications: The results were subject to the following limitations: cross-sectional design, mostly self-report measures, and the lack of control endemic to field research. As such, this study is viewed as an initial test of the team-learning model in a field setting. Additional research, including longitudinal designs and experimental designs, are called for. Practical implications: This study adds to the growing literature on group learning. Educators and managers need to be aware that there are different kinds of learning processes in which groups can engage and that these are stimulated to occur differently and have a different impact on outcomes. Originality/value: Team learning is rarely assessed directly as a construct in its own right and there is a lack of empirical support delineating causes and consequences of team learning. This field study is a first step in this direction.",
keywords = "Adaptability, Learning methods, Learning processes, Project teams, Team learning",
author = "Valerie Sessa and Manuel London and Christopher Pingor and Beyza Gullu and Juhi Patel",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/13527591111143691",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "146--167",
journal = "Team Performance Management",
issn = "1352-7592",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Adaptive, generative, and transformative learning in project teams. / Sessa, Valerie; London, Manuel; Pingor, Christopher; Gullu, Beyza; Patel, Juhi.

In: Team Performance Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.06.2011, p. 146-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive, generative, and transformative learning in project teams

AU - Sessa, Valerie

AU - London, Manuel

AU - Pingor, Christopher

AU - Gullu, Beyza

AU - Patel, Juhi

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze a framework of team learning that includes three learning processes (adaptive, generative, and transformative), factors that stimulate these processes, and consequences of them. The variables provided a field study of the model. Design/methodology/approach: In the field study, 69 project teams of 3 to 11 students and their instructors responded to surveys. Findings: Positive learning stimuli were related to adaptive and generative learning processes, while negative stimuli were related to transformative learning processes. Learning processes were related to individual student learning outcomes. In addition, adaptive and generative learning processes were positively related to team and instructor ratings of outcome quality, while transformative learning was negatively related to team ratings of outcome quality. Research limitations/implications: The results were subject to the following limitations: cross-sectional design, mostly self-report measures, and the lack of control endemic to field research. As such, this study is viewed as an initial test of the team-learning model in a field setting. Additional research, including longitudinal designs and experimental designs, are called for. Practical implications: This study adds to the growing literature on group learning. Educators and managers need to be aware that there are different kinds of learning processes in which groups can engage and that these are stimulated to occur differently and have a different impact on outcomes. Originality/value: Team learning is rarely assessed directly as a construct in its own right and there is a lack of empirical support delineating causes and consequences of team learning. This field study is a first step in this direction.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze a framework of team learning that includes three learning processes (adaptive, generative, and transformative), factors that stimulate these processes, and consequences of them. The variables provided a field study of the model. Design/methodology/approach: In the field study, 69 project teams of 3 to 11 students and their instructors responded to surveys. Findings: Positive learning stimuli were related to adaptive and generative learning processes, while negative stimuli were related to transformative learning processes. Learning processes were related to individual student learning outcomes. In addition, adaptive and generative learning processes were positively related to team and instructor ratings of outcome quality, while transformative learning was negatively related to team ratings of outcome quality. Research limitations/implications: The results were subject to the following limitations: cross-sectional design, mostly self-report measures, and the lack of control endemic to field research. As such, this study is viewed as an initial test of the team-learning model in a field setting. Additional research, including longitudinal designs and experimental designs, are called for. Practical implications: This study adds to the growing literature on group learning. Educators and managers need to be aware that there are different kinds of learning processes in which groups can engage and that these are stimulated to occur differently and have a different impact on outcomes. Originality/value: Team learning is rarely assessed directly as a construct in its own right and there is a lack of empirical support delineating causes and consequences of team learning. This field study is a first step in this direction.

KW - Adaptability

KW - Learning methods

KW - Learning processes

KW - Project teams

KW - Team learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959263421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/13527591111143691

DO - 10.1108/13527591111143691

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79959263421

VL - 17

SP - 146

EP - 167

JO - Team Performance Management

JF - Team Performance Management

SN - 1352-7592

IS - 3

ER -