Adaptive Memory: Evaluating Alternative Forms of Fitness-Relevant Processing in the Survival Processing Paradigm

Joshua Sandry, David Trafimow, Michael J. Marks, Stephen Rice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Memory may have evolved to preserve information processed in terms of its fitness-relevance. Based on the assumption that the human mind comprises different fitness-relevant adaptive mechanisms contributing to survival and reproductive success, we compared alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios with survival processing. Participants rated words for relevancy to fitness-relevant and control conditions followed by a delay and surprise recall test (Experiment 1a). Participants recalled more words processed for their relevance to a survival situation. We replicated these findings in an online study (Experiment 2) and a study using revised fitness-relevant scenarios (Experiment 3). Across all experiments, we did not find a mnemonic benefit for alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios, questioning assumptions associated with an evolutionary account of remembering. Based on these results, fitness-relevance seems to be too wide-ranging of a construct to account for the memory findings associated with survival processing. We propose that memory may be hierarchically sensitive to fitness-relevant processing instructions. We encourage future researchers to investigate the underlying mechanisms responsible for survival processing effects and work toward developing a taxonomy of adaptive memory.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere60868
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Data storage equipment
Survival
Processing
Experiments
Taxonomies
preserves
researchers
Research Personnel
taxonomy
testing

Cite this

@article{6df294f846504e81b4f01dcf32b0d44d,
title = "Adaptive Memory: Evaluating Alternative Forms of Fitness-Relevant Processing in the Survival Processing Paradigm",
abstract = "Memory may have evolved to preserve information processed in terms of its fitness-relevance. Based on the assumption that the human mind comprises different fitness-relevant adaptive mechanisms contributing to survival and reproductive success, we compared alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios with survival processing. Participants rated words for relevancy to fitness-relevant and control conditions followed by a delay and surprise recall test (Experiment 1a). Participants recalled more words processed for their relevance to a survival situation. We replicated these findings in an online study (Experiment 2) and a study using revised fitness-relevant scenarios (Experiment 3). Across all experiments, we did not find a mnemonic benefit for alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios, questioning assumptions associated with an evolutionary account of remembering. Based on these results, fitness-relevance seems to be too wide-ranging of a construct to account for the memory findings associated with survival processing. We propose that memory may be hierarchically sensitive to fitness-relevant processing instructions. We encourage future researchers to investigate the underlying mechanisms responsible for survival processing effects and work toward developing a taxonomy of adaptive memory.",
author = "Joshua Sandry and David Trafimow and Marks, {Michael J.} and Stephen Rice",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0060868",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "PloS one",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

Adaptive Memory : Evaluating Alternative Forms of Fitness-Relevant Processing in the Survival Processing Paradigm. / Sandry, Joshua; Trafimow, David; Marks, Michael J.; Rice, Stephen.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 4, e60868, 09.04.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive Memory

T2 - Evaluating Alternative Forms of Fitness-Relevant Processing in the Survival Processing Paradigm

AU - Sandry, Joshua

AU - Trafimow, David

AU - Marks, Michael J.

AU - Rice, Stephen

PY - 2013/4/9

Y1 - 2013/4/9

N2 - Memory may have evolved to preserve information processed in terms of its fitness-relevance. Based on the assumption that the human mind comprises different fitness-relevant adaptive mechanisms contributing to survival and reproductive success, we compared alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios with survival processing. Participants rated words for relevancy to fitness-relevant and control conditions followed by a delay and surprise recall test (Experiment 1a). Participants recalled more words processed for their relevance to a survival situation. We replicated these findings in an online study (Experiment 2) and a study using revised fitness-relevant scenarios (Experiment 3). Across all experiments, we did not find a mnemonic benefit for alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios, questioning assumptions associated with an evolutionary account of remembering. Based on these results, fitness-relevance seems to be too wide-ranging of a construct to account for the memory findings associated with survival processing. We propose that memory may be hierarchically sensitive to fitness-relevant processing instructions. We encourage future researchers to investigate the underlying mechanisms responsible for survival processing effects and work toward developing a taxonomy of adaptive memory.

AB - Memory may have evolved to preserve information processed in terms of its fitness-relevance. Based on the assumption that the human mind comprises different fitness-relevant adaptive mechanisms contributing to survival and reproductive success, we compared alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios with survival processing. Participants rated words for relevancy to fitness-relevant and control conditions followed by a delay and surprise recall test (Experiment 1a). Participants recalled more words processed for their relevance to a survival situation. We replicated these findings in an online study (Experiment 2) and a study using revised fitness-relevant scenarios (Experiment 3). Across all experiments, we did not find a mnemonic benefit for alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios, questioning assumptions associated with an evolutionary account of remembering. Based on these results, fitness-relevance seems to be too wide-ranging of a construct to account for the memory findings associated with survival processing. We propose that memory may be hierarchically sensitive to fitness-relevant processing instructions. We encourage future researchers to investigate the underlying mechanisms responsible for survival processing effects and work toward developing a taxonomy of adaptive memory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876050028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0060868

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0060868

M3 - Article

C2 - 23585858

AN - SCOPUS:84876050028

VL - 8

JO - PloS one

JF - PloS one

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e60868

ER -