Adolescents' social reasoning about relational aggression

Sara Goldstein, Marie S. Tisak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined early adolescents' reasoning about relational aggression, and the links that their reasoning has to their own relationally aggressive behavior. Thinking about relational aggression was compared to thinking about physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior. In individual interviews, adolescents (N = 103) rated the acceptability of relational aggression, physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior, and justified their ratings. Results indicated that adolescents' views about relational aggression are complex. Although gossip was viewed as very wrong (comparable to beliefs about physical aggression), exclusion was perceived to be somewhat acceptable (less wrong than conventional violations, but more wrong than personal behaviors). With regard to associations between beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior, the results indicated that beliefs about gossip were associated with gossiping behavior, and that beliefs about physical aggression were associated with physically aggressive behavior. No links emerged between beliefs about exclusion and exclusionary behavior. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed within the frameworks of social domain theory and social information processing models of aggressive behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-482
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Child and Family Studies
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Aggression
aggression
adolescent
aggressive behavior
exclusion
Automatic Data Processing
information processing
rating
Interviews
interview

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Early adolescence
  • Peer relationships
  • Social cognition
  • Social reasoning

Cite this

@article{66be7084defc4c45a593476dd3fc6234,
title = "Adolescents' social reasoning about relational aggression",
abstract = "We examined early adolescents' reasoning about relational aggression, and the links that their reasoning has to their own relationally aggressive behavior. Thinking about relational aggression was compared to thinking about physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior. In individual interviews, adolescents (N = 103) rated the acceptability of relational aggression, physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior, and justified their ratings. Results indicated that adolescents' views about relational aggression are complex. Although gossip was viewed as very wrong (comparable to beliefs about physical aggression), exclusion was perceived to be somewhat acceptable (less wrong than conventional violations, but more wrong than personal behaviors). With regard to associations between beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior, the results indicated that beliefs about gossip were associated with gossiping behavior, and that beliefs about physical aggression were associated with physically aggressive behavior. No links emerged between beliefs about exclusion and exclusionary behavior. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed within the frameworks of social domain theory and social information processing models of aggressive behavior.",
keywords = "Aggression, Early adolescence, Peer relationships, Social cognition, Social reasoning",
author = "Sara Goldstein and Tisak, {Marie S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10826-009-9319-1",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "471--482",
journal = "Journal of Child and Family Studies",
issn = "1062-1024",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Adolescents' social reasoning about relational aggression. / Goldstein, Sara; Tisak, Marie S.

In: Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.01.2010, p. 471-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adolescents' social reasoning about relational aggression

AU - Goldstein, Sara

AU - Tisak, Marie S.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - We examined early adolescents' reasoning about relational aggression, and the links that their reasoning has to their own relationally aggressive behavior. Thinking about relational aggression was compared to thinking about physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior. In individual interviews, adolescents (N = 103) rated the acceptability of relational aggression, physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior, and justified their ratings. Results indicated that adolescents' views about relational aggression are complex. Although gossip was viewed as very wrong (comparable to beliefs about physical aggression), exclusion was perceived to be somewhat acceptable (less wrong than conventional violations, but more wrong than personal behaviors). With regard to associations between beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior, the results indicated that beliefs about gossip were associated with gossiping behavior, and that beliefs about physical aggression were associated with physically aggressive behavior. No links emerged between beliefs about exclusion and exclusionary behavior. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed within the frameworks of social domain theory and social information processing models of aggressive behavior.

AB - We examined early adolescents' reasoning about relational aggression, and the links that their reasoning has to their own relationally aggressive behavior. Thinking about relational aggression was compared to thinking about physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior. In individual interviews, adolescents (N = 103) rated the acceptability of relational aggression, physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior, and justified their ratings. Results indicated that adolescents' views about relational aggression are complex. Although gossip was viewed as very wrong (comparable to beliefs about physical aggression), exclusion was perceived to be somewhat acceptable (less wrong than conventional violations, but more wrong than personal behaviors). With regard to associations between beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior, the results indicated that beliefs about gossip were associated with gossiping behavior, and that beliefs about physical aggression were associated with physically aggressive behavior. No links emerged between beliefs about exclusion and exclusionary behavior. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed within the frameworks of social domain theory and social information processing models of aggressive behavior.

KW - Aggression

KW - Early adolescence

KW - Peer relationships

KW - Social cognition

KW - Social reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954312820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10826-009-9319-1

DO - 10.1007/s10826-009-9319-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954312820

VL - 19

SP - 471

EP - 482

JO - Journal of Child and Family Studies

JF - Journal of Child and Family Studies

SN - 1062-1024

IS - 4

ER -