Abstract
Using critical discourse analysis and Undocumented Critical Theory, I analyzed 16 statements from New Jersey higher education leaders who addressed federal anti-immigrant policies (2017–2019). Findings show leaders responded in four ways: (1) acompañamiento through explanatory support, political action, and affiliations; (2) reducing fear by providing relevant information; (3) recognizing immigrant students’ diverse experiences with legal liminality; and (4) sharing conflicting messages about immigration processes and undocumented parents. None included state-specific information relevant to undocumented or immigrant students. Recommendations are provided for university leaders addressing immigration issues, especially during politically uncertain times.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 540-556 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An UndocuCrit Analysis of New Jersey Higher Education Leaders’ Statements of Support for Undocumented Students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver