TY - JOUR
T1 - Are intertemporal preferences contagious? Evidence from collaborative decision making
AU - Bixter, Michael T.
AU - Trimber, Elizabeth M.
AU - Luhmann, Christian C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Psychonomic Society, Inc.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Prior research has provided substantial insight into individuals’ intertemporal preferences (i.e., preferences about delayed rewards). In the present study, we instead investigated the preferences of small groups of individuals asked to express collective intertemporal decisions. The paradigm consisted of three phases. During the precollaboration and postcollaboration phases, participants completed an intertemporal decision task individually. During the collaboration phase, participants completed a similar task in small groups, reaching mutually-agreed-upon decisions. The results suggest that group preferences were systematically related to the mean of the group members’ precollaboration preferences. In addition, collaborative decision making altered the group members’ intertemporal preferences. Specifically, individuals’ postcollaboration preferences converged toward the preferences of their respective groups. Furthermore, we found that individuals’ postcollaboration preferences were independently related to both their precollaboration preferences and the preferences of the other group members, suggesting that individuals’ postcollaboration preferences represented a revision of their precollaboration preferences based on the preferences observed in other group members. In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that similar patterns of results were found whether participants were making matching judgments or binary choices.
AB - Prior research has provided substantial insight into individuals’ intertemporal preferences (i.e., preferences about delayed rewards). In the present study, we instead investigated the preferences of small groups of individuals asked to express collective intertemporal decisions. The paradigm consisted of three phases. During the precollaboration and postcollaboration phases, participants completed an intertemporal decision task individually. During the collaboration phase, participants completed a similar task in small groups, reaching mutually-agreed-upon decisions. The results suggest that group preferences were systematically related to the mean of the group members’ precollaboration preferences. In addition, collaborative decision making altered the group members’ intertemporal preferences. Specifically, individuals’ postcollaboration preferences converged toward the preferences of their respective groups. Furthermore, we found that individuals’ postcollaboration preferences were independently related to both their precollaboration preferences and the preferences of the other group members, suggesting that individuals’ postcollaboration preferences represented a revision of their precollaboration preferences based on the preferences observed in other group members. In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that similar patterns of results were found whether participants were making matching judgments or binary choices.
KW - Collaboration
KW - Decision making
KW - Intertemporal preferences
KW - Social influence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014569718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13421-017-0698-z
DO - 10.3758/s13421-017-0698-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 28265901
AN - SCOPUS:85014569718
SN - 0090-502X
VL - 45
SP - 837
EP - 851
JO - Memory and Cognition
JF - Memory and Cognition
IS - 5
ER -