Arguing towards truth

The case of the periodic table

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently Erik Scerri has published an influential philosophical history of the development of the Periodic Table. Following Scerri's account, I will explore the main thread of the arguments responsible for the remarkable advancement of scientific understanding that the Periodic Table represents. I will argue that the history of disputation at crucial junctures in the debate shows sensitivity to the aspects of truth that are captured by my model of truth in inquiry. The availability of a clear and explicit model of truth in inquiry is of crucial importance as a response to post-modernist and other relativistic accounts of inquiry. It shows that despite such apparent sociological constraints as acceptability a robust theory of truth is available as a foundation for evaluating argumentation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-197
Number of pages13
JournalArgumentation
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2011

Fingerprint

history
argumentation
Periodic Table
History
Acceptability
Theory of Truth
Disputation
Postmodernist
Scientific Understanding
Argumentation

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Formal model
  • Periodic table
  • Science
  • Truth

Cite this

@article{a13546c69a07476b9836e3b92849fc68,
title = "Arguing towards truth: The case of the periodic table",
abstract = "Recently Erik Scerri has published an influential philosophical history of the development of the Periodic Table. Following Scerri's account, I will explore the main thread of the arguments responsible for the remarkable advancement of scientific understanding that the Periodic Table represents. I will argue that the history of disputation at crucial junctures in the debate shows sensitivity to the aspects of truth that are captured by my model of truth in inquiry. The availability of a clear and explicit model of truth in inquiry is of crucial importance as a response to post-modernist and other relativistic accounts of inquiry. It shows that despite such apparent sociological constraints as acceptability a robust theory of truth is available as a foundation for evaluating argumentation.",
keywords = "Argumentation, Formal model, Periodic table, Science, Truth",
author = "Mark Weinstein",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10503-011-9206-y",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "185--197",
journal = "Argumentation",
issn = "0920-427X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Arguing towards truth : The case of the periodic table. / Weinstein, Mark.

In: Argumentation, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.05.2011, p. 185-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arguing towards truth

T2 - The case of the periodic table

AU - Weinstein, Mark

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - Recently Erik Scerri has published an influential philosophical history of the development of the Periodic Table. Following Scerri's account, I will explore the main thread of the arguments responsible for the remarkable advancement of scientific understanding that the Periodic Table represents. I will argue that the history of disputation at crucial junctures in the debate shows sensitivity to the aspects of truth that are captured by my model of truth in inquiry. The availability of a clear and explicit model of truth in inquiry is of crucial importance as a response to post-modernist and other relativistic accounts of inquiry. It shows that despite such apparent sociological constraints as acceptability a robust theory of truth is available as a foundation for evaluating argumentation.

AB - Recently Erik Scerri has published an influential philosophical history of the development of the Periodic Table. Following Scerri's account, I will explore the main thread of the arguments responsible for the remarkable advancement of scientific understanding that the Periodic Table represents. I will argue that the history of disputation at crucial junctures in the debate shows sensitivity to the aspects of truth that are captured by my model of truth in inquiry. The availability of a clear and explicit model of truth in inquiry is of crucial importance as a response to post-modernist and other relativistic accounts of inquiry. It shows that despite such apparent sociological constraints as acceptability a robust theory of truth is available as a foundation for evaluating argumentation.

KW - Argumentation

KW - Formal model

KW - Periodic table

KW - Science

KW - Truth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955851400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10503-011-9206-y

DO - 10.1007/s10503-011-9206-y

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 185

EP - 197

JO - Argumentation

JF - Argumentation

SN - 0920-427X

IS - 2

ER -