Assessing public preferences for forest biomass based energy in the southern United States

Andres Susaeta, Janaki Alavalapati, Pankaj Lal, Jagannadha R. Matta, Evan Mercer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article investigated public preferences for forest biomass based liquid biofuels, particularly ethanol blends of 10% (E10) and 85% (E85). We conducted a choice experiment study in three southern states in the United States: Arkansas, Florida, and Virginia. Reducing atmospheric CO 2, decreasing risk of wildfires and pest outbreaks, and enhancing biodiversity were presented to respondents as attributes of using biofuels. Results indicated that individuals had a positive extra willingness to pay (WTP) for both ethanol blends. The extra WTP was greater for higher blends that offered larger environment benefits. The WTPs for E10 were 0.56 gallon -1, 0.58 gallon -1, and 0.48 gallon -1, and for E85 they were 0.82 gallon -1, 1.17 gallon -1, and 1.06 gallon -1 in Arkansas, Florida, and Virginia, respectively. Although differences in WTP for E10 were statistically insignificant among the three states, significant differences were found in the WTP for E85 between AR and FL and between AR and VA. Preferences for the environmental attributes appeared to be heterogeneous, as respondents' were willing to pay a premium for E10 in all three states to facilitate the reduction of CO 2 and the improvement of biodiversity but were not willing to pay more for E85 in order to enhance biodiversity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)697-710
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 Feb 2010

Fingerprint

willingness to pay
ethanol
Biomass
Ethanol
Biodiversity
biomass
energy
biodiversity
Biofuels
biofuel
pest outbreak
wildfire
public
liquid
Liquids
experiment
Experiments
attribute

Keywords

  • Biofuels
  • Choice experiment
  • Willingness to pay

Cite this

Susaeta, Andres ; Alavalapati, Janaki ; Lal, Pankaj ; Matta, Jagannadha R. ; Mercer, Evan. / Assessing public preferences for forest biomass based energy in the southern United States. In: Environmental Management. 2010 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 697-710.
@article{35ddc1497cba41ac8725ac453563077d,
title = "Assessing public preferences for forest biomass based energy in the southern United States",
abstract = "This article investigated public preferences for forest biomass based liquid biofuels, particularly ethanol blends of 10{\%} (E10) and 85{\%} (E85). We conducted a choice experiment study in three southern states in the United States: Arkansas, Florida, and Virginia. Reducing atmospheric CO 2, decreasing risk of wildfires and pest outbreaks, and enhancing biodiversity were presented to respondents as attributes of using biofuels. Results indicated that individuals had a positive extra willingness to pay (WTP) for both ethanol blends. The extra WTP was greater for higher blends that offered larger environment benefits. The WTPs for E10 were 0.56 gallon -1, 0.58 gallon -1, and 0.48 gallon -1, and for E85 they were 0.82 gallon -1, 1.17 gallon -1, and 1.06 gallon -1 in Arkansas, Florida, and Virginia, respectively. Although differences in WTP for E10 were statistically insignificant among the three states, significant differences were found in the WTP for E85 between AR and FL and between AR and VA. Preferences for the environmental attributes appeared to be heterogeneous, as respondents' were willing to pay a premium for E10 in all three states to facilitate the reduction of CO 2 and the improvement of biodiversity but were not willing to pay more for E85 in order to enhance biodiversity.",
keywords = "Biofuels, Choice experiment, Willingness to pay",
author = "Andres Susaeta and Janaki Alavalapati and Pankaj Lal and Matta, {Jagannadha R.} and Evan Mercer",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-010-9445-y",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "697--710",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Assessing public preferences for forest biomass based energy in the southern United States. / Susaeta, Andres; Alavalapati, Janaki; Lal, Pankaj; Matta, Jagannadha R.; Mercer, Evan.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 45, No. 4, 09.02.2010, p. 697-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing public preferences for forest biomass based energy in the southern United States

AU - Susaeta, Andres

AU - Alavalapati, Janaki

AU - Lal, Pankaj

AU - Matta, Jagannadha R.

AU - Mercer, Evan

PY - 2010/2/9

Y1 - 2010/2/9

N2 - This article investigated public preferences for forest biomass based liquid biofuels, particularly ethanol blends of 10% (E10) and 85% (E85). We conducted a choice experiment study in three southern states in the United States: Arkansas, Florida, and Virginia. Reducing atmospheric CO 2, decreasing risk of wildfires and pest outbreaks, and enhancing biodiversity were presented to respondents as attributes of using biofuels. Results indicated that individuals had a positive extra willingness to pay (WTP) for both ethanol blends. The extra WTP was greater for higher blends that offered larger environment benefits. The WTPs for E10 were 0.56 gallon -1, 0.58 gallon -1, and 0.48 gallon -1, and for E85 they were 0.82 gallon -1, 1.17 gallon -1, and 1.06 gallon -1 in Arkansas, Florida, and Virginia, respectively. Although differences in WTP for E10 were statistically insignificant among the three states, significant differences were found in the WTP for E85 between AR and FL and between AR and VA. Preferences for the environmental attributes appeared to be heterogeneous, as respondents' were willing to pay a premium for E10 in all three states to facilitate the reduction of CO 2 and the improvement of biodiversity but were not willing to pay more for E85 in order to enhance biodiversity.

AB - This article investigated public preferences for forest biomass based liquid biofuels, particularly ethanol blends of 10% (E10) and 85% (E85). We conducted a choice experiment study in three southern states in the United States: Arkansas, Florida, and Virginia. Reducing atmospheric CO 2, decreasing risk of wildfires and pest outbreaks, and enhancing biodiversity were presented to respondents as attributes of using biofuels. Results indicated that individuals had a positive extra willingness to pay (WTP) for both ethanol blends. The extra WTP was greater for higher blends that offered larger environment benefits. The WTPs for E10 were 0.56 gallon -1, 0.58 gallon -1, and 0.48 gallon -1, and for E85 they were 0.82 gallon -1, 1.17 gallon -1, and 1.06 gallon -1 in Arkansas, Florida, and Virginia, respectively. Although differences in WTP for E10 were statistically insignificant among the three states, significant differences were found in the WTP for E85 between AR and FL and between AR and VA. Preferences for the environmental attributes appeared to be heterogeneous, as respondents' were willing to pay a premium for E10 in all three states to facilitate the reduction of CO 2 and the improvement of biodiversity but were not willing to pay more for E85 in order to enhance biodiversity.

KW - Biofuels

KW - Choice experiment

KW - Willingness to pay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952098301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-010-9445-y

DO - 10.1007/s00267-010-9445-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 20140672

AN - SCOPUS:77952098301

VL - 45

SP - 697

EP - 710

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 4

ER -