Assessing the impact of emerging anti-bullying legislation on children and youth

Alicia Raia-Hawrylak, Christopher Donoghue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - Anti-bullying legislation has been adopted in every state to prevent the victimization of youth, but the focus on deterring and criminalizing individual behavior can obscure the contextual factors that contribute to aggression. This theoretical paper engages sociological literature to understand the impact of recent anti-bullying legislation on students' experiences. Design/methodology/approach - We discuss stigma and accountmaking theory to theorize the ways students become particularly vulnerable to victimization and may or may not be sufficiently protected under the law. We also engage criminological theories to understand how punishment may not be sufficient for preventing aggressive behavior but may instead lead students to employ strategies to avoid being caught or punished for their behaviors. Findings - We argue that the majority of current anti-bullying definitions and protocols in use are ambiguous and insufficient in protecting vulnerable groups of students, particularly students with disabilities, overweight students, and LGBT+ students. Originality/value - Our findings suggest that schools should seek to understand and alter the school-wide cultures and norms that permit aggressive behavior in the first place, in turn creating more inclusive school environments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-184
Number of pages18
JournalSociological Studies of Children and Youth
Volume20
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

exclusion
legislation
student
aggressive behavior
victimization
school
aggression
penalty
disability
Law
methodology
Values
experience
Group

Keywords

  • Aggressive behavior
  • Bullying
  • Children
  • Civil rights law
  • School climate
  • Victimization

Cite this

@article{0d409ec838fa4299be7468d4319520ae,
title = "Assessing the impact of emerging anti-bullying legislation on children and youth",
abstract = "Purpose - Anti-bullying legislation has been adopted in every state to prevent the victimization of youth, but the focus on deterring and criminalizing individual behavior can obscure the contextual factors that contribute to aggression. This theoretical paper engages sociological literature to understand the impact of recent anti-bullying legislation on students' experiences. Design/methodology/approach - We discuss stigma and accountmaking theory to theorize the ways students become particularly vulnerable to victimization and may or may not be sufficiently protected under the law. We also engage criminological theories to understand how punishment may not be sufficient for preventing aggressive behavior but may instead lead students to employ strategies to avoid being caught or punished for their behaviors. Findings - We argue that the majority of current anti-bullying definitions and protocols in use are ambiguous and insufficient in protecting vulnerable groups of students, particularly students with disabilities, overweight students, and LGBT+ students. Originality/value - Our findings suggest that schools should seek to understand and alter the school-wide cultures and norms that permit aggressive behavior in the first place, in turn creating more inclusive school environments.",
keywords = "Aggressive behavior, Bullying, Children, Civil rights law, School climate, Victimization",
author = "Alicia Raia-Hawrylak and Christopher Donoghue",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S1537-466120160000020007",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "167--184",
journal = "Sociological Studies of Children and Youth",
issn = "1537-4661",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

}

Assessing the impact of emerging anti-bullying legislation on children and youth. / Raia-Hawrylak, Alicia; Donoghue, Christopher.

In: Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, Vol. 20, 01.01.2016, p. 167-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the impact of emerging anti-bullying legislation on children and youth

AU - Raia-Hawrylak, Alicia

AU - Donoghue, Christopher

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose - Anti-bullying legislation has been adopted in every state to prevent the victimization of youth, but the focus on deterring and criminalizing individual behavior can obscure the contextual factors that contribute to aggression. This theoretical paper engages sociological literature to understand the impact of recent anti-bullying legislation on students' experiences. Design/methodology/approach - We discuss stigma and accountmaking theory to theorize the ways students become particularly vulnerable to victimization and may or may not be sufficiently protected under the law. We also engage criminological theories to understand how punishment may not be sufficient for preventing aggressive behavior but may instead lead students to employ strategies to avoid being caught or punished for their behaviors. Findings - We argue that the majority of current anti-bullying definitions and protocols in use are ambiguous and insufficient in protecting vulnerable groups of students, particularly students with disabilities, overweight students, and LGBT+ students. Originality/value - Our findings suggest that schools should seek to understand and alter the school-wide cultures and norms that permit aggressive behavior in the first place, in turn creating more inclusive school environments.

AB - Purpose - Anti-bullying legislation has been adopted in every state to prevent the victimization of youth, but the focus on deterring and criminalizing individual behavior can obscure the contextual factors that contribute to aggression. This theoretical paper engages sociological literature to understand the impact of recent anti-bullying legislation on students' experiences. Design/methodology/approach - We discuss stigma and accountmaking theory to theorize the ways students become particularly vulnerable to victimization and may or may not be sufficiently protected under the law. We also engage criminological theories to understand how punishment may not be sufficient for preventing aggressive behavior but may instead lead students to employ strategies to avoid being caught or punished for their behaviors. Findings - We argue that the majority of current anti-bullying definitions and protocols in use are ambiguous and insufficient in protecting vulnerable groups of students, particularly students with disabilities, overweight students, and LGBT+ students. Originality/value - Our findings suggest that schools should seek to understand and alter the school-wide cultures and norms that permit aggressive behavior in the first place, in turn creating more inclusive school environments.

KW - Aggressive behavior

KW - Bullying

KW - Children

KW - Civil rights law

KW - School climate

KW - Victimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982844598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1537-466120160000020007

DO - 10.1108/S1537-466120160000020007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84982844598

VL - 20

SP - 167

EP - 184

JO - Sociological Studies of Children and Youth

JF - Sociological Studies of Children and Youth

SN - 1537-4661

ER -