Assessing the most powerful analysis method for school-based intervention studies with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug outcomes

Jessica B. Janega, David M. Murray, Sherri P. Varnell, Jonathan L. Blitstein, Amanda Birnbaum, Leslie A. Lytle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article compares four mixed-model analyses valid for group-randomized trials (GRTs) involving a nested cohort design with a single pretest and a single posttest, the most common design used in GRTs. This study makes estimates of intraclass correlations (ICCs) available to investigators planning GRTs with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug measures as the outcomes of interest. It also provides formulae demonstrating the potential benefits to the standard error of the intervention effect of both adjustments for fixed and time-varying covariates, as well as correlations over time. These estimates will allow other researchers using these variables to plan their studies by performing a priori power analyses for any of four common analytic options.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-606
Number of pages12
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2004

Fingerprint

Tobacco
Alcohols
Research Personnel
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Planning

Keywords

  • ATOD prevention
  • Group-randomized trial
  • Intraclass correlation
  • Power
  • School based

Cite this

Janega, Jessica B. ; Murray, David M. ; Varnell, Sherri P. ; Blitstein, Jonathan L. ; Birnbaum, Amanda ; Lytle, Leslie A. / Assessing the most powerful analysis method for school-based intervention studies with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug outcomes. In: Addictive Behaviors. 2004 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 595-606.
@article{691ca14fdc4e4e248c56f2d193cc7fa0,
title = "Assessing the most powerful analysis method for school-based intervention studies with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug outcomes",
abstract = "This article compares four mixed-model analyses valid for group-randomized trials (GRTs) involving a nested cohort design with a single pretest and a single posttest, the most common design used in GRTs. This study makes estimates of intraclass correlations (ICCs) available to investigators planning GRTs with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug measures as the outcomes of interest. It also provides formulae demonstrating the potential benefits to the standard error of the intervention effect of both adjustments for fixed and time-varying covariates, as well as correlations over time. These estimates will allow other researchers using these variables to plan their studies by performing a priori power analyses for any of four common analytic options.",
keywords = "ATOD prevention, Group-randomized trial, Intraclass correlation, Power, School based",
author = "Janega, {Jessica B.} and Murray, {David M.} and Varnell, {Sherri P.} and Blitstein, {Jonathan L.} and Amanda Birnbaum and Lytle, {Leslie A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.01.002",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "595--606",
journal = "Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0306-4603",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Assessing the most powerful analysis method for school-based intervention studies with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug outcomes. / Janega, Jessica B.; Murray, David M.; Varnell, Sherri P.; Blitstein, Jonathan L.; Birnbaum, Amanda; Lytle, Leslie A.

In: Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.05.2004, p. 595-606.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the most powerful analysis method for school-based intervention studies with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug outcomes

AU - Janega, Jessica B.

AU - Murray, David M.

AU - Varnell, Sherri P.

AU - Blitstein, Jonathan L.

AU - Birnbaum, Amanda

AU - Lytle, Leslie A.

PY - 2004/5/1

Y1 - 2004/5/1

N2 - This article compares four mixed-model analyses valid for group-randomized trials (GRTs) involving a nested cohort design with a single pretest and a single posttest, the most common design used in GRTs. This study makes estimates of intraclass correlations (ICCs) available to investigators planning GRTs with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug measures as the outcomes of interest. It also provides formulae demonstrating the potential benefits to the standard error of the intervention effect of both adjustments for fixed and time-varying covariates, as well as correlations over time. These estimates will allow other researchers using these variables to plan their studies by performing a priori power analyses for any of four common analytic options.

AB - This article compares four mixed-model analyses valid for group-randomized trials (GRTs) involving a nested cohort design with a single pretest and a single posttest, the most common design used in GRTs. This study makes estimates of intraclass correlations (ICCs) available to investigators planning GRTs with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug measures as the outcomes of interest. It also provides formulae demonstrating the potential benefits to the standard error of the intervention effect of both adjustments for fixed and time-varying covariates, as well as correlations over time. These estimates will allow other researchers using these variables to plan their studies by performing a priori power analyses for any of four common analytic options.

KW - ATOD prevention

KW - Group-randomized trial

KW - Intraclass correlation

KW - Power

KW - School based

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842422022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.01.002

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 595

EP - 606

JO - Addictive Behaviors

JF - Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0306-4603

IS - 3

ER -