Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing the most powerful analysis method for school-based intervention studies with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug outcomes

  • Jessica B. Janega
  • , David M. Murray
  • , Sherri P. Varnell
  • , Jonathan L. Blitstein
  • , Amanda S. Birnbaum
  • , Leslie A. Lytle

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article compares four mixed-model analyses valid for group-randomized trials (GRTs) involving a nested cohort design with a single pretest and a single posttest, the most common design used in GRTs. This study makes estimates of intraclass correlations (ICCs) available to investigators planning GRTs with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug measures as the outcomes of interest. It also provides formulae demonstrating the potential benefits to the standard error of the intervention effect of both adjustments for fixed and time-varying covariates, as well as correlations over time. These estimates will allow other researchers using these variables to plan their studies by performing a priori power analyses for any of four common analytic options.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-606
Number of pages12
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2004

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • ATOD prevention
  • Group-randomized trial
  • Intraclass correlation
  • Power
  • School based

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the most powerful analysis method for school-based intervention studies with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this