Athlete reputational crisis and consumer evaluation

Shintaro Sato, Yong Jae Ko, Chanmin Park, Weiting Tao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research question: The mass media widely broadcasts scandals. However, previous literature lacks examinations of consumer reactions to athlete scandals. Given the detrimental impact, it is important to understand how athletes and brand managers can optimally respond when scandals occur. The purpose of this study is to develop the fundamental understanding of consumer reactions and the effective response strategies in athlete reputational crisis (ARC) settings. Research methods: A three factorial (performance relatedness × intentionality × involvement) experiment was conducted. One hundred ninety-three undergraduate students from a large university located in the southeastern United States participated in the experiment, with analysis based on 180 useful responses. Results and findings: The results indicate that high and low involvement spectators differ in their evaluations of scandalized athletes. The attitude of highly involved consumers is significantly more negative when ARCs are performance related and intentional. Low involvement consumers’ attitude displayed a similar pattern, but only when they perceived ARCs as unintentional. Lastly, the results indicate consumers prefer rebuild response strategies (e.g. apology) in all ARC situations. Base strategies (e.g. explaining ARC situations) and sport-specific strategies (e.g. winning to make up) can be used to supplement in performance-related ARC situations. Implications: This study contributes to the fundamental knowledge regarding the potential impact of ARCs. Athlete brand managers can estimate the extent of impact based on ARC characteristics (i.e. performance relatedness and intentionality) and consumer characteristics (i.e. involvement). Furthermore, effective response strategies can be developed by examining the interplay between ARC and consumer characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)434-453
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Sport Management Quarterly
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 8 Aug 2015

Fingerprint

relatedness
mass media
research method
sport
student
experiment
evaluation
Consumer evaluation
analysis
Scandal

Keywords

  • athlete endorser
  • athlete scandal
  • attitude
  • perceived reputation
  • risk management

Cite this

Sato, Shintaro ; Ko, Yong Jae ; Park, Chanmin ; Tao, Weiting. / Athlete reputational crisis and consumer evaluation. In: European Sport Management Quarterly. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 434-453.
@article{3607ebd8fdeb49b293e3f80331638a8d,
title = "Athlete reputational crisis and consumer evaluation",
abstract = "Research question: The mass media widely broadcasts scandals. However, previous literature lacks examinations of consumer reactions to athlete scandals. Given the detrimental impact, it is important to understand how athletes and brand managers can optimally respond when scandals occur. The purpose of this study is to develop the fundamental understanding of consumer reactions and the effective response strategies in athlete reputational crisis (ARC) settings. Research methods: A three factorial (performance relatedness × intentionality × involvement) experiment was conducted. One hundred ninety-three undergraduate students from a large university located in the southeastern United States participated in the experiment, with analysis based on 180 useful responses. Results and findings: The results indicate that high and low involvement spectators differ in their evaluations of scandalized athletes. The attitude of highly involved consumers is significantly more negative when ARCs are performance related and intentional. Low involvement consumers’ attitude displayed a similar pattern, but only when they perceived ARCs as unintentional. Lastly, the results indicate consumers prefer rebuild response strategies (e.g. apology) in all ARC situations. Base strategies (e.g. explaining ARC situations) and sport-specific strategies (e.g. winning to make up) can be used to supplement in performance-related ARC situations. Implications: This study contributes to the fundamental knowledge regarding the potential impact of ARCs. Athlete brand managers can estimate the extent of impact based on ARC characteristics (i.e. performance relatedness and intentionality) and consumer characteristics (i.e. involvement). Furthermore, effective response strategies can be developed by examining the interplay between ARC and consumer characteristics.",
keywords = "athlete endorser, athlete scandal, attitude, perceived reputation, risk management",
author = "Shintaro Sato and Ko, {Yong Jae} and Chanmin Park and Weiting Tao",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/16184742.2015.1065895",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "434--453",
journal = "European Sport Management Quarterly",
issn = "1618-4742",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Athlete reputational crisis and consumer evaluation. / Sato, Shintaro; Ko, Yong Jae; Park, Chanmin; Tao, Weiting.

In: European Sport Management Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 4, 08.08.2015, p. 434-453.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Athlete reputational crisis and consumer evaluation

AU - Sato, Shintaro

AU - Ko, Yong Jae

AU - Park, Chanmin

AU - Tao, Weiting

PY - 2015/8/8

Y1 - 2015/8/8

N2 - Research question: The mass media widely broadcasts scandals. However, previous literature lacks examinations of consumer reactions to athlete scandals. Given the detrimental impact, it is important to understand how athletes and brand managers can optimally respond when scandals occur. The purpose of this study is to develop the fundamental understanding of consumer reactions and the effective response strategies in athlete reputational crisis (ARC) settings. Research methods: A three factorial (performance relatedness × intentionality × involvement) experiment was conducted. One hundred ninety-three undergraduate students from a large university located in the southeastern United States participated in the experiment, with analysis based on 180 useful responses. Results and findings: The results indicate that high and low involvement spectators differ in their evaluations of scandalized athletes. The attitude of highly involved consumers is significantly more negative when ARCs are performance related and intentional. Low involvement consumers’ attitude displayed a similar pattern, but only when they perceived ARCs as unintentional. Lastly, the results indicate consumers prefer rebuild response strategies (e.g. apology) in all ARC situations. Base strategies (e.g. explaining ARC situations) and sport-specific strategies (e.g. winning to make up) can be used to supplement in performance-related ARC situations. Implications: This study contributes to the fundamental knowledge regarding the potential impact of ARCs. Athlete brand managers can estimate the extent of impact based on ARC characteristics (i.e. performance relatedness and intentionality) and consumer characteristics (i.e. involvement). Furthermore, effective response strategies can be developed by examining the interplay between ARC and consumer characteristics.

AB - Research question: The mass media widely broadcasts scandals. However, previous literature lacks examinations of consumer reactions to athlete scandals. Given the detrimental impact, it is important to understand how athletes and brand managers can optimally respond when scandals occur. The purpose of this study is to develop the fundamental understanding of consumer reactions and the effective response strategies in athlete reputational crisis (ARC) settings. Research methods: A three factorial (performance relatedness × intentionality × involvement) experiment was conducted. One hundred ninety-three undergraduate students from a large university located in the southeastern United States participated in the experiment, with analysis based on 180 useful responses. Results and findings: The results indicate that high and low involvement spectators differ in their evaluations of scandalized athletes. The attitude of highly involved consumers is significantly more negative when ARCs are performance related and intentional. Low involvement consumers’ attitude displayed a similar pattern, but only when they perceived ARCs as unintentional. Lastly, the results indicate consumers prefer rebuild response strategies (e.g. apology) in all ARC situations. Base strategies (e.g. explaining ARC situations) and sport-specific strategies (e.g. winning to make up) can be used to supplement in performance-related ARC situations. Implications: This study contributes to the fundamental knowledge regarding the potential impact of ARCs. Athlete brand managers can estimate the extent of impact based on ARC characteristics (i.e. performance relatedness and intentionality) and consumer characteristics (i.e. involvement). Furthermore, effective response strategies can be developed by examining the interplay between ARC and consumer characteristics.

KW - athlete endorser

KW - athlete scandal

KW - attitude

KW - perceived reputation

KW - risk management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945343897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/16184742.2015.1065895

DO - 10.1080/16184742.2015.1065895

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945343897

VL - 15

SP - 434

EP - 453

JO - European Sport Management Quarterly

JF - European Sport Management Quarterly

SN - 1618-4742

IS - 4

ER -