Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization

Matthew Forsythe, Debra Zellner, Elizabeth Cogan, Scott Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that, when subjects view hedonically positive stimuli followed by stimuli of lesser hedonic value, their preference between the stimuli of lesser hedonic value decreases. This is hedonic condensation. In addition, its opposite, hedonic expansion, occurs when subjects view less hedonically positive stimuli followed by more hedonically positive stimuli. Experiment 1 showed both hedonic condensation and expansion in subjects who viewed pictures of unattractive and moderately attractive faces. Experiment 2 showed that, when subjects were instructed to view the stimuli as coming from two different groups, hedonic expansion but not hedonic condensation was eliminated. Experiment 3 showed that increasing the attractiveness difference between the attractive and unattractive faces eliminated all effects of context on subjects' attractiveness difference judgments. Experiment 4 showed that forcing subjects to categorize the extremely attractive and unattractive faces into the same group resulted in hedonic expansion among attractive faces but not condensation among the unattractive faces. These results suggest that, as hedonic contrast changes the hedonic values of stimuli, it also changes the attention paid to those stimuli, thereby altering the degree of preference between them. Manipulations that prevent a shift in hedonic value also block a shift in the magnitude of the preference judgments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-69
Number of pages11
JournalPerception
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Pleasure
Condensation
Experiments

Keywords

  • Attractiveness
  • Difference judgments
  • Hedonic contrast
  • Hedonic judgments

Cite this

Forsythe, Matthew ; Zellner, Debra ; Cogan, Elizabeth ; Parker, Scott. / Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization. In: Perception. 2014 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 59-69.
@article{42a0b24622de4e8496332c708f120d12,
title = "Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization",
abstract = "Previous studies have shown that, when subjects view hedonically positive stimuli followed by stimuli of lesser hedonic value, their preference between the stimuli of lesser hedonic value decreases. This is hedonic condensation. In addition, its opposite, hedonic expansion, occurs when subjects view less hedonically positive stimuli followed by more hedonically positive stimuli. Experiment 1 showed both hedonic condensation and expansion in subjects who viewed pictures of unattractive and moderately attractive faces. Experiment 2 showed that, when subjects were instructed to view the stimuli as coming from two different groups, hedonic expansion but not hedonic condensation was eliminated. Experiment 3 showed that increasing the attractiveness difference between the attractive and unattractive faces eliminated all effects of context on subjects' attractiveness difference judgments. Experiment 4 showed that forcing subjects to categorize the extremely attractive and unattractive faces into the same group resulted in hedonic expansion among attractive faces but not condensation among the unattractive faces. These results suggest that, as hedonic contrast changes the hedonic values of stimuli, it also changes the attention paid to those stimuli, thereby altering the degree of preference between them. Manipulations that prevent a shift in hedonic value also block a shift in the magnitude of the preference judgments.",
keywords = "Attractiveness, Difference judgments, Hedonic contrast, Hedonic judgments",
author = "Matthew Forsythe and Debra Zellner and Elizabeth Cogan and Scott Parker",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1068/p7574",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "59--69",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Forsythe, M, Zellner, D, Cogan, E & Parker, S 2014, 'Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization', Perception, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7574

Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization. / Forsythe, Matthew; Zellner, Debra; Cogan, Elizabeth; Parker, Scott.

In: Perception, Vol. 43, No. 1, 20.02.2014, p. 59-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization

AU - Forsythe, Matthew

AU - Zellner, Debra

AU - Cogan, Elizabeth

AU - Parker, Scott

PY - 2014/2/20

Y1 - 2014/2/20

N2 - Previous studies have shown that, when subjects view hedonically positive stimuli followed by stimuli of lesser hedonic value, their preference between the stimuli of lesser hedonic value decreases. This is hedonic condensation. In addition, its opposite, hedonic expansion, occurs when subjects view less hedonically positive stimuli followed by more hedonically positive stimuli. Experiment 1 showed both hedonic condensation and expansion in subjects who viewed pictures of unattractive and moderately attractive faces. Experiment 2 showed that, when subjects were instructed to view the stimuli as coming from two different groups, hedonic expansion but not hedonic condensation was eliminated. Experiment 3 showed that increasing the attractiveness difference between the attractive and unattractive faces eliminated all effects of context on subjects' attractiveness difference judgments. Experiment 4 showed that forcing subjects to categorize the extremely attractive and unattractive faces into the same group resulted in hedonic expansion among attractive faces but not condensation among the unattractive faces. These results suggest that, as hedonic contrast changes the hedonic values of stimuli, it also changes the attention paid to those stimuli, thereby altering the degree of preference between them. Manipulations that prevent a shift in hedonic value also block a shift in the magnitude of the preference judgments.

AB - Previous studies have shown that, when subjects view hedonically positive stimuli followed by stimuli of lesser hedonic value, their preference between the stimuli of lesser hedonic value decreases. This is hedonic condensation. In addition, its opposite, hedonic expansion, occurs when subjects view less hedonically positive stimuli followed by more hedonically positive stimuli. Experiment 1 showed both hedonic condensation and expansion in subjects who viewed pictures of unattractive and moderately attractive faces. Experiment 2 showed that, when subjects were instructed to view the stimuli as coming from two different groups, hedonic expansion but not hedonic condensation was eliminated. Experiment 3 showed that increasing the attractiveness difference between the attractive and unattractive faces eliminated all effects of context on subjects' attractiveness difference judgments. Experiment 4 showed that forcing subjects to categorize the extremely attractive and unattractive faces into the same group resulted in hedonic expansion among attractive faces but not condensation among the unattractive faces. These results suggest that, as hedonic contrast changes the hedonic values of stimuli, it also changes the attention paid to those stimuli, thereby altering the degree of preference between them. Manipulations that prevent a shift in hedonic value also block a shift in the magnitude of the preference judgments.

KW - Attractiveness

KW - Difference judgments

KW - Hedonic contrast

KW - Hedonic judgments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893945542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/p7574

DO - 10.1068/p7574

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 59

EP - 69

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 1

ER -