Attributions of Deception in Human Mating Strategies

Julian Keenan, Gordon G. Gallup, Nicole Goulet, Mrinmoyi Kulkarni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In accordance with evolutionary theory, females have to make the greatest parental investment and as a result bear a greater risk when mating compared to males. In humans, both males and females use particular gender-defined strategies in mating, including strategies and counter-strategies. Undergraduates (48 females, 18 males) filled out a survey in which they were to assess how the opposite gender would present themselves in dating situations. It was found that females assume more deception overall by members of the opposite sex. For females, attributions of deception also depended on the apparent sexual motivation of the deceiver, while males assumed little deception regardless of the sexual motivation of the deceiver. These results support the hypotheses of gender differences in the detection of deception and that females who bear the greater risk in reproduction are more cautious maters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-52
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Social Behavior and Personality
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 Dec 1997

Fingerprint

Deception
Motivation
Reproduction
Mothers

Cite this

Keenan, J., Gallup, G. G., Goulet, N., & Kulkarni, M. (1997). Attributions of Deception in Human Mating Strategies. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(1), 45-52.
Keenan, Julian ; Gallup, Gordon G. ; Goulet, Nicole ; Kulkarni, Mrinmoyi. / Attributions of Deception in Human Mating Strategies. In: Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1997 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 45-52.
@article{50daea5e47d649ce9314fba43193607f,
title = "Attributions of Deception in Human Mating Strategies",
abstract = "In accordance with evolutionary theory, females have to make the greatest parental investment and as a result bear a greater risk when mating compared to males. In humans, both males and females use particular gender-defined strategies in mating, including strategies and counter-strategies. Undergraduates (48 females, 18 males) filled out a survey in which they were to assess how the opposite gender would present themselves in dating situations. It was found that females assume more deception overall by members of the opposite sex. For females, attributions of deception also depended on the apparent sexual motivation of the deceiver, while males assumed little deception regardless of the sexual motivation of the deceiver. These results support the hypotheses of gender differences in the detection of deception and that females who bear the greater risk in reproduction are more cautious maters.",
author = "Julian Keenan and Gallup, {Gordon G.} and Nicole Goulet and Mrinmoyi Kulkarni",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "45--52",
journal = "Journal of Social Behavior and Personality",
issn = "0886-1641",
publisher = "University of Hartford",
number = "1",

}

Keenan, J, Gallup, GG, Goulet, N & Kulkarni, M 1997, 'Attributions of Deception in Human Mating Strategies', Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45-52.

Attributions of Deception in Human Mating Strategies. / Keenan, Julian; Gallup, Gordon G.; Goulet, Nicole; Kulkarni, Mrinmoyi.

In: Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.12.1997, p. 45-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attributions of Deception in Human Mating Strategies

AU - Keenan, Julian

AU - Gallup, Gordon G.

AU - Goulet, Nicole

AU - Kulkarni, Mrinmoyi

PY - 1997/12/1

Y1 - 1997/12/1

N2 - In accordance with evolutionary theory, females have to make the greatest parental investment and as a result bear a greater risk when mating compared to males. In humans, both males and females use particular gender-defined strategies in mating, including strategies and counter-strategies. Undergraduates (48 females, 18 males) filled out a survey in which they were to assess how the opposite gender would present themselves in dating situations. It was found that females assume more deception overall by members of the opposite sex. For females, attributions of deception also depended on the apparent sexual motivation of the deceiver, while males assumed little deception regardless of the sexual motivation of the deceiver. These results support the hypotheses of gender differences in the detection of deception and that females who bear the greater risk in reproduction are more cautious maters.

AB - In accordance with evolutionary theory, females have to make the greatest parental investment and as a result bear a greater risk when mating compared to males. In humans, both males and females use particular gender-defined strategies in mating, including strategies and counter-strategies. Undergraduates (48 females, 18 males) filled out a survey in which they were to assess how the opposite gender would present themselves in dating situations. It was found that females assume more deception overall by members of the opposite sex. For females, attributions of deception also depended on the apparent sexual motivation of the deceiver, while males assumed little deception regardless of the sexual motivation of the deceiver. These results support the hypotheses of gender differences in the detection of deception and that females who bear the greater risk in reproduction are more cautious maters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031498842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 45

EP - 52

JO - Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

JF - Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

SN - 0886-1641

IS - 1

ER -