Averted eye-gaze disrupts configural face encoding

Steven G. Young, Michael L. Slepian, John Paul Wilson, Kurt Hugenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Faces are processed in a configural manner (i.e., without decomposition into individual face features), an effect attributed to humans having a high degree of face processing expertise. However, even when perceiver expertise is accounted for, configural processing is subject to a number of influences, including the social relevance of a face. In the current research, we present two experiments that document the influence of eye-gaze direction (direct or averted) on configural encoding of faces. Experiment 1 uses a version of the composite face paradigm to investigate how eye-gaze influences configural encoding. The results indicate that averted gaze disrupts configural encoding compared to direct eye-gaze. Experiment 2 manipulates whether perceivers can engage in configural encoding using face-inversion, and finds the inversion effects are greater for faces with direct than averted-gaze. We interpret these results as evidence that averted eye-gaze signals that a face is subjectively unimportant, thereby disrupting configural encoding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-99
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume53
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Keywords

  • Eye-gaze
  • Face memory
  • Face perception

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Averted eye-gaze disrupts configural face encoding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this