Beyond free speech: Novel approaches to hate on the Internet in the United States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hate on the Internet presents a unique problem in the United States. The First Amendment to the Constitution protects speech, even that which is hateful and offensive. Although the First Amendment is not without limitation and, indeed, although there have been a small number of successful prosecutions of individuals who disseminated hate speech over the Internet, web-based hate continues to receive broad First Amendment protections. Some non-governmental organiza- tions in the United States, such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center, have adopted innovative approaches to hate on the Internet. For instance, the ADL tracks and monitors hate-based websites, identifies hate trends, works cooperatively with law enforcement, notifies potentially impacted communities about relevant hate activities, and responds with training, educational curricula and counter-messages. It also has taken a novel, free-enterprise approach to encouraging ISP regulation of hate-speech on the Internet. The ADL has successfully worked with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to enforce terms of service contracts (TOS) against hate-based website. While identifying originating ISPs is no small challenge, ISPs may voluntarily cease to provide Internet access when made aware of offensive hate content. This article first examines the evolving legal jurisprudence in the United States regarding prosecutions of hate speech on the Internet. It then analyzes the roles of NGOs in monitoring, tracking and regulating hate on the Internet. Finally, it examines the potential and limitations of these efforts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-251
Number of pages17
JournalInformation and Communications Technology Law
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2009

Fingerprint

hate
Internet service providers
Internet
service provider
Websites
amendment
prosecution
Law enforcement
website
Curricula
educational training
law enforcement
Monitoring
jurisprudence
non-governmental organization
constitution

Keywords

  • Anti-defamation League
  • First Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Hate crime
  • Hate speech
  • Internet
  • Online threat
  • Southern Poverty Law Center

Cite this

@article{7fd00ff70d364e38bb4ff00cc633d86c,
title = "Beyond free speech: Novel approaches to hate on the Internet in the United States",
abstract = "Hate on the Internet presents a unique problem in the United States. The First Amendment to the Constitution protects speech, even that which is hateful and offensive. Although the First Amendment is not without limitation and, indeed, although there have been a small number of successful prosecutions of individuals who disseminated hate speech over the Internet, web-based hate continues to receive broad First Amendment protections. Some non-governmental organiza- tions in the United States, such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center, have adopted innovative approaches to hate on the Internet. For instance, the ADL tracks and monitors hate-based websites, identifies hate trends, works cooperatively with law enforcement, notifies potentially impacted communities about relevant hate activities, and responds with training, educational curricula and counter-messages. It also has taken a novel, free-enterprise approach to encouraging ISP regulation of hate-speech on the Internet. The ADL has successfully worked with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to enforce terms of service contracts (TOS) against hate-based website. While identifying originating ISPs is no small challenge, ISPs may voluntarily cease to provide Internet access when made aware of offensive hate content. This article first examines the evolving legal jurisprudence in the United States regarding prosecutions of hate speech on the Internet. It then analyzes the roles of NGOs in monitoring, tracking and regulating hate on the Internet. Finally, it examines the potential and limitations of these efforts.",
keywords = "Anti-defamation League, First Amendment, Freedom of speech, Hate crime, Hate speech, Internet, Online threat, Southern Poverty Law Center",
author = "Henry, {Jessica S}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13600830902808127",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "235--251",
journal = "Information and Communications Technology Law",
issn = "1360-0834",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Beyond free speech : Novel approaches to hate on the Internet in the United States. / Henry, Jessica S.

In: Information and Communications Technology Law, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.06.2009, p. 235-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond free speech

T2 - Novel approaches to hate on the Internet in the United States

AU - Henry, Jessica S

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - Hate on the Internet presents a unique problem in the United States. The First Amendment to the Constitution protects speech, even that which is hateful and offensive. Although the First Amendment is not without limitation and, indeed, although there have been a small number of successful prosecutions of individuals who disseminated hate speech over the Internet, web-based hate continues to receive broad First Amendment protections. Some non-governmental organiza- tions in the United States, such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center, have adopted innovative approaches to hate on the Internet. For instance, the ADL tracks and monitors hate-based websites, identifies hate trends, works cooperatively with law enforcement, notifies potentially impacted communities about relevant hate activities, and responds with training, educational curricula and counter-messages. It also has taken a novel, free-enterprise approach to encouraging ISP regulation of hate-speech on the Internet. The ADL has successfully worked with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to enforce terms of service contracts (TOS) against hate-based website. While identifying originating ISPs is no small challenge, ISPs may voluntarily cease to provide Internet access when made aware of offensive hate content. This article first examines the evolving legal jurisprudence in the United States regarding prosecutions of hate speech on the Internet. It then analyzes the roles of NGOs in monitoring, tracking and regulating hate on the Internet. Finally, it examines the potential and limitations of these efforts.

AB - Hate on the Internet presents a unique problem in the United States. The First Amendment to the Constitution protects speech, even that which is hateful and offensive. Although the First Amendment is not without limitation and, indeed, although there have been a small number of successful prosecutions of individuals who disseminated hate speech over the Internet, web-based hate continues to receive broad First Amendment protections. Some non-governmental organiza- tions in the United States, such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center, have adopted innovative approaches to hate on the Internet. For instance, the ADL tracks and monitors hate-based websites, identifies hate trends, works cooperatively with law enforcement, notifies potentially impacted communities about relevant hate activities, and responds with training, educational curricula and counter-messages. It also has taken a novel, free-enterprise approach to encouraging ISP regulation of hate-speech on the Internet. The ADL has successfully worked with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to enforce terms of service contracts (TOS) against hate-based website. While identifying originating ISPs is no small challenge, ISPs may voluntarily cease to provide Internet access when made aware of offensive hate content. This article first examines the evolving legal jurisprudence in the United States regarding prosecutions of hate speech on the Internet. It then analyzes the roles of NGOs in monitoring, tracking and regulating hate on the Internet. Finally, it examines the potential and limitations of these efforts.

KW - Anti-defamation League

KW - First Amendment

KW - Freedom of speech

KW - Hate crime

KW - Hate speech

KW - Internet

KW - Online threat

KW - Southern Poverty Law Center

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75349101865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13600830902808127

DO - 10.1080/13600830902808127

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:75349101865

VL - 18

SP - 235

EP - 251

JO - Information and Communications Technology Law

JF - Information and Communications Technology Law

SN - 1360-0834

IS - 2

ER -