Building Framework for Nursing Scholarship

Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion

Judy Honig, Janice Smolowitz, Elaine Larson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As nursing academia responds to shifts in nursing education-the emergence of clinically focused doctoral degrees and an emphasis on evidence-based practice, comparative effectiveness, and translational research, nursing scholarship is undergoing transformation.This article outlines guidelines for appointment and promotion that incorporate the academic tripartite and are relevant for all faculty. A clear and equitable pathway for professorial advancement for the both the clinician and research faculty is delineated. Without such clarity and equity, the unique contributions of clinical and research scholars and the synergy that results from these distinctions will not be garnered. Although there is significant overlap in the criteria, there are also distinguishing scholarly activities and outcomes. For each standard at each rank, unique sample criteria of clinical and research scholarship are outlined and the shared scholarly activities that demonstrate the standard.Using an adaptation of Boyer's model, the guidelines incorporate a broadened view of nursing scholarship and offer a framework for nursing academia that recognizes new ways of knowledge. Although recognizing the coexistence of science and practice, these guidelines offer a clear trajectory for advancement in the professorial role that applies an expanded perspective of and provide a framework for nursing scholarship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-369
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Professional Nursing
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Appointments and Schedules
Nursing
Guidelines
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Research
Translational Medical Research
Nursing Education
Evidence-Based Practice
Practice Guidelines

Keywords

  • Appointment and promotion
  • Faculty scholarship
  • Nursing academia
  • Nursing scholarship

Cite this

@article{4e36cd4039f045d2abdcba025c9b28e2,
title = "Building Framework for Nursing Scholarship: Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion",
abstract = "As nursing academia responds to shifts in nursing education-the emergence of clinically focused doctoral degrees and an emphasis on evidence-based practice, comparative effectiveness, and translational research, nursing scholarship is undergoing transformation.This article outlines guidelines for appointment and promotion that incorporate the academic tripartite and are relevant for all faculty. A clear and equitable pathway for professorial advancement for the both the clinician and research faculty is delineated. Without such clarity and equity, the unique contributions of clinical and research scholars and the synergy that results from these distinctions will not be garnered. Although there is significant overlap in the criteria, there are also distinguishing scholarly activities and outcomes. For each standard at each rank, unique sample criteria of clinical and research scholarship are outlined and the shared scholarly activities that demonstrate the standard.Using an adaptation of Boyer's model, the guidelines incorporate a broadened view of nursing scholarship and offer a framework for nursing academia that recognizes new ways of knowledge. Although recognizing the coexistence of science and practice, these guidelines offer a clear trajectory for advancement in the professorial role that applies an expanded perspective of and provide a framework for nursing scholarship.",
keywords = "Appointment and promotion, Faculty scholarship, Nursing academia, Nursing scholarship",
author = "Judy Honig and Janice Smolowitz and Elaine Larson",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "359--369",
journal = "Journal of Professional Nursing",
issn = "8755-7223",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Building Framework for Nursing Scholarship : Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion. / Honig, Judy; Smolowitz, Janice; Larson, Elaine.

In: Journal of Professional Nursing, Vol. 29, No. 6, 01.11.2013, p. 359-369.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building Framework for Nursing Scholarship

T2 - Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion

AU - Honig, Judy

AU - Smolowitz, Janice

AU - Larson, Elaine

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - As nursing academia responds to shifts in nursing education-the emergence of clinically focused doctoral degrees and an emphasis on evidence-based practice, comparative effectiveness, and translational research, nursing scholarship is undergoing transformation.This article outlines guidelines for appointment and promotion that incorporate the academic tripartite and are relevant for all faculty. A clear and equitable pathway for professorial advancement for the both the clinician and research faculty is delineated. Without such clarity and equity, the unique contributions of clinical and research scholars and the synergy that results from these distinctions will not be garnered. Although there is significant overlap in the criteria, there are also distinguishing scholarly activities and outcomes. For each standard at each rank, unique sample criteria of clinical and research scholarship are outlined and the shared scholarly activities that demonstrate the standard.Using an adaptation of Boyer's model, the guidelines incorporate a broadened view of nursing scholarship and offer a framework for nursing academia that recognizes new ways of knowledge. Although recognizing the coexistence of science and practice, these guidelines offer a clear trajectory for advancement in the professorial role that applies an expanded perspective of and provide a framework for nursing scholarship.

AB - As nursing academia responds to shifts in nursing education-the emergence of clinically focused doctoral degrees and an emphasis on evidence-based practice, comparative effectiveness, and translational research, nursing scholarship is undergoing transformation.This article outlines guidelines for appointment and promotion that incorporate the academic tripartite and are relevant for all faculty. A clear and equitable pathway for professorial advancement for the both the clinician and research faculty is delineated. Without such clarity and equity, the unique contributions of clinical and research scholars and the synergy that results from these distinctions will not be garnered. Although there is significant overlap in the criteria, there are also distinguishing scholarly activities and outcomes. For each standard at each rank, unique sample criteria of clinical and research scholarship are outlined and the shared scholarly activities that demonstrate the standard.Using an adaptation of Boyer's model, the guidelines incorporate a broadened view of nursing scholarship and offer a framework for nursing academia that recognizes new ways of knowledge. Although recognizing the coexistence of science and practice, these guidelines offer a clear trajectory for advancement in the professorial role that applies an expanded perspective of and provide a framework for nursing scholarship.

KW - Appointment and promotion

KW - Faculty scholarship

KW - Nursing academia

KW - Nursing scholarship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888173295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.001

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 359

EP - 369

JO - Journal of Professional Nursing

JF - Journal of Professional Nursing

SN - 8755-7223

IS - 6

ER -