Can priming your self lead to punishing others?

Joshua Sandry, Gayle Hunt, Stephen Rice, David Trafimow, Kasha Geels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research has shown that priming the individual self can increase the accessibility of individual self-cognitions. In turn, we hypothesized that blame for immoral behaviors also would increase, leading to higher assignments of punishment, but that the size of this effect would depend on whether the behaviors violated perfect or imperfect duties. To test these hypotheses, participants assigned yearly bonus penalties to employees who had performed dishonest, disloyal, unfriendly, or uncharitable acts. As expected, the individual prime increased punishments, and this effect was accentuated for violations of perfect duties relative to violations of imperfect duties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)531-534
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume151
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Punishment
Cognition
Research

Keywords

  • collective
  • duties
  • imperfect
  • individual
  • perfect
  • self-priming

Cite this

Sandry, Joshua ; Hunt, Gayle ; Rice, Stephen ; Trafimow, David ; Geels, Kasha. / Can priming your self lead to punishing others?. In: Journal of Social Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 151, No. 5. pp. 531-534.
@article{e0bb7d1891e148e481703cad8eee68da,
title = "Can priming your self lead to punishing others?",
abstract = "Previous research has shown that priming the individual self can increase the accessibility of individual self-cognitions. In turn, we hypothesized that blame for immoral behaviors also would increase, leading to higher assignments of punishment, but that the size of this effect would depend on whether the behaviors violated perfect or imperfect duties. To test these hypotheses, participants assigned yearly bonus penalties to employees who had performed dishonest, disloyal, unfriendly, or uncharitable acts. As expected, the individual prime increased punishments, and this effect was accentuated for violations of perfect duties relative to violations of imperfect duties.",
keywords = "collective, duties, imperfect, individual, perfect, self-priming",
author = "Joshua Sandry and Gayle Hunt and Stephen Rice and David Trafimow and Kasha Geels",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00224545.2010.503720",
language = "English",
volume = "151",
pages = "531--534",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

Can priming your self lead to punishing others? / Sandry, Joshua; Hunt, Gayle; Rice, Stephen; Trafimow, David; Geels, Kasha.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 151, No. 5, 01.09.2011, p. 531-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can priming your self lead to punishing others?

AU - Sandry, Joshua

AU - Hunt, Gayle

AU - Rice, Stephen

AU - Trafimow, David

AU - Geels, Kasha

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Previous research has shown that priming the individual self can increase the accessibility of individual self-cognitions. In turn, we hypothesized that blame for immoral behaviors also would increase, leading to higher assignments of punishment, but that the size of this effect would depend on whether the behaviors violated perfect or imperfect duties. To test these hypotheses, participants assigned yearly bonus penalties to employees who had performed dishonest, disloyal, unfriendly, or uncharitable acts. As expected, the individual prime increased punishments, and this effect was accentuated for violations of perfect duties relative to violations of imperfect duties.

AB - Previous research has shown that priming the individual self can increase the accessibility of individual self-cognitions. In turn, we hypothesized that blame for immoral behaviors also would increase, leading to higher assignments of punishment, but that the size of this effect would depend on whether the behaviors violated perfect or imperfect duties. To test these hypotheses, participants assigned yearly bonus penalties to employees who had performed dishonest, disloyal, unfriendly, or uncharitable acts. As expected, the individual prime increased punishments, and this effect was accentuated for violations of perfect duties relative to violations of imperfect duties.

KW - collective

KW - duties

KW - imperfect

KW - individual

KW - perfect

KW - self-priming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052308076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00224545.2010.503720

DO - 10.1080/00224545.2010.503720

M3 - Article

VL - 151

SP - 531

EP - 534

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 5

ER -