Categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers versus consistent-right-handers: part II

Ruth E. Propper, Andrew Wolfarth, Tad T. Brunye, Christophe Carlei, Sophia Lall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A previous study reported superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-versus consistent-right-handers (ICH versus CRH). Propper et al. used a three-dimensional (3D) computer-based task wherein individuals navigated to 21 locations within a realistic cityscape. During testing, participants were queried on their categorical and coordinate spatial knowledge of the map. In that study, the categorical and coordinate tasks may have inadvertently encouraged language coding of learned spatial information, potentially confounding spatial processing with recall ability for language-based information. Also, that study used a between-subjects design, which precludes examination of relationships between spatial knowledge as a function of handedness. The present study duplicated the learning task in Propper et al. using test stimuli that more faithfully represent spatial, and not language-based, information, as well as a within-subjects design. Results did not significantly replicate the previous study. Possible reasons for this finding are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-446
Number of pages6
JournalCognitive Processing
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Task Performance and Analysis
Language
Functional Laterality
Aptitude
Testing
Processing
Learning

Keywords

  • Categorical
  • Coordinate
  • Handedness
  • Spatial processing

Cite this

Propper, Ruth E. ; Wolfarth, Andrew ; Brunye, Tad T. ; Carlei, Christophe ; Lall, Sophia. / Categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers versus consistent-right-handers : part II. In: Cognitive Processing. 2019 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 441-446.
@article{cf6797229c024c37a29c5e1700e60921,
title = "Categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers versus consistent-right-handers: part II",
abstract = "A previous study reported superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-versus consistent-right-handers (ICH versus CRH). Propper et al. used a three-dimensional (3D) computer-based task wherein individuals navigated to 21 locations within a realistic cityscape. During testing, participants were queried on their categorical and coordinate spatial knowledge of the map. In that study, the categorical and coordinate tasks may have inadvertently encouraged language coding of learned spatial information, potentially confounding spatial processing with recall ability for language-based information. Also, that study used a between-subjects design, which precludes examination of relationships between spatial knowledge as a function of handedness. The present study duplicated the learning task in Propper et al. using test stimuli that more faithfully represent spatial, and not language-based, information, as well as a within-subjects design. Results did not significantly replicate the previous study. Possible reasons for this finding are discussed.",
keywords = "Categorical, Coordinate, Handedness, Spatial processing",
author = "Propper, {Ruth E.} and Andrew Wolfarth and Brunye, {Tad T.} and Christophe Carlei and Sophia Lall",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10339-019-00926-x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "441--446",
journal = "Cognitive Processing",
issn = "1612-4782",
number = "4",

}

Categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers versus consistent-right-handers : part II. / Propper, Ruth E.; Wolfarth, Andrew; Brunye, Tad T.; Carlei, Christophe; Lall, Sophia.

In: Cognitive Processing, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.11.2019, p. 441-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers versus consistent-right-handers

T2 - part II

AU - Propper, Ruth E.

AU - Wolfarth, Andrew

AU - Brunye, Tad T.

AU - Carlei, Christophe

AU - Lall, Sophia

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - A previous study reported superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-versus consistent-right-handers (ICH versus CRH). Propper et al. used a three-dimensional (3D) computer-based task wherein individuals navigated to 21 locations within a realistic cityscape. During testing, participants were queried on their categorical and coordinate spatial knowledge of the map. In that study, the categorical and coordinate tasks may have inadvertently encouraged language coding of learned spatial information, potentially confounding spatial processing with recall ability for language-based information. Also, that study used a between-subjects design, which precludes examination of relationships between spatial knowledge as a function of handedness. The present study duplicated the learning task in Propper et al. using test stimuli that more faithfully represent spatial, and not language-based, information, as well as a within-subjects design. Results did not significantly replicate the previous study. Possible reasons for this finding are discussed.

AB - A previous study reported superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-versus consistent-right-handers (ICH versus CRH). Propper et al. used a three-dimensional (3D) computer-based task wherein individuals navigated to 21 locations within a realistic cityscape. During testing, participants were queried on their categorical and coordinate spatial knowledge of the map. In that study, the categorical and coordinate tasks may have inadvertently encouraged language coding of learned spatial information, potentially confounding spatial processing with recall ability for language-based information. Also, that study used a between-subjects design, which precludes examination of relationships between spatial knowledge as a function of handedness. The present study duplicated the learning task in Propper et al. using test stimuli that more faithfully represent spatial, and not language-based, information, as well as a within-subjects design. Results did not significantly replicate the previous study. Possible reasons for this finding are discussed.

KW - Categorical

KW - Coordinate

KW - Handedness

KW - Spatial processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071852411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10339-019-00926-x

DO - 10.1007/s10339-019-00926-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 31463863

AN - SCOPUS:85071852411

VL - 20

SP - 441

EP - 446

JO - Cognitive Processing

JF - Cognitive Processing

SN - 1612-4782

IS - 4

ER -