Challenging the authority of the medical definition of disability: An analysis of the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article attempts to explain why the social constructionist paradigm has failed to replace the medical model in American disability theory. The social movement led by American disability activists attempted to reframe the definition of disability using a minority group model based on the social constructionist paradigm. This paper argues that the disability movement was unable to successfully advance the social constructionist paradigm because the activists accepted the Americans With Disabilities Act (1990) despite its ideological basis in the medical model of disability, and the social constructionist theory does not adequately account for the importance of structural constraints to redefinition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-208
Number of pages10
JournalDisability and Society
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2003

Fingerprint

Minority Groups
disability
paradigm
social movement
Social Theory
act
minority
Group

Cite this

@article{beff65bdc5344ec3a874ec2449b9b495,
title = "Challenging the authority of the medical definition of disability: An analysis of the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm",
abstract = "This article attempts to explain why the social constructionist paradigm has failed to replace the medical model in American disability theory. The social movement led by American disability activists attempted to reframe the definition of disability using a minority group model based on the social constructionist paradigm. This paper argues that the disability movement was unable to successfully advance the social constructionist paradigm because the activists accepted the Americans With Disabilities Act (1990) despite its ideological basis in the medical model of disability, and the social constructionist theory does not adequately account for the importance of structural constraints to redefinition.",
author = "Christopher Donoghue",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0968759032000052833",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "199--208",
journal = "Disability and Society",
issn = "0968-7599",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenging the authority of the medical definition of disability

T2 - An analysis of the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm

AU - Donoghue, Christopher

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - This article attempts to explain why the social constructionist paradigm has failed to replace the medical model in American disability theory. The social movement led by American disability activists attempted to reframe the definition of disability using a minority group model based on the social constructionist paradigm. This paper argues that the disability movement was unable to successfully advance the social constructionist paradigm because the activists accepted the Americans With Disabilities Act (1990) despite its ideological basis in the medical model of disability, and the social constructionist theory does not adequately account for the importance of structural constraints to redefinition.

AB - This article attempts to explain why the social constructionist paradigm has failed to replace the medical model in American disability theory. The social movement led by American disability activists attempted to reframe the definition of disability using a minority group model based on the social constructionist paradigm. This paper argues that the disability movement was unable to successfully advance the social constructionist paradigm because the activists accepted the Americans With Disabilities Act (1990) despite its ideological basis in the medical model of disability, and the social constructionist theory does not adequately account for the importance of structural constraints to redefinition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038182838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0968759032000052833

DO - 10.1080/0968759032000052833

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0038182838

VL - 18

SP - 199

EP - 208

JO - Disability and Society

JF - Disability and Society

SN - 0968-7599

IS - 2

ER -