TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenging the authority of the medical definition of disability
T2 - An analysis of the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm
AU - Donoghue, Christopher
PY - 2003/3
Y1 - 2003/3
N2 - This article attempts to explain why the social constructionist paradigm has failed to replace the medical model in American disability theory. The social movement led by American disability activists attempted to reframe the definition of disability using a minority group model based on the social constructionist paradigm. This paper argues that the disability movement was unable to successfully advance the social constructionist paradigm because the activists accepted the Americans With Disabilities Act (1990) despite its ideological basis in the medical model of disability, and the social constructionist theory does not adequately account for the importance of structural constraints to redefinition.
AB - This article attempts to explain why the social constructionist paradigm has failed to replace the medical model in American disability theory. The social movement led by American disability activists attempted to reframe the definition of disability using a minority group model based on the social constructionist paradigm. This paper argues that the disability movement was unable to successfully advance the social constructionist paradigm because the activists accepted the Americans With Disabilities Act (1990) despite its ideological basis in the medical model of disability, and the social constructionist theory does not adequately account for the importance of structural constraints to redefinition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038182838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0968759032000052833
DO - 10.1080/0968759032000052833
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0038182838
SN - 0968-7599
VL - 18
SP - 199
EP - 208
JO - Disability and Society
JF - Disability and Society
IS - 2
ER -