Children, literacy and the Uk National Grid for Learning

Colin Lankshear, Michele Knobel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents a critical assessment from the standpoint of early childhood literacy of Britain’s ambitious and costly on-line learning resource, the National Grid for Learning. It provides an overview of the aims, scope and administration of the Grid, together with typical examples of content available for users in the early childhood age range (0–8 years).The authors argue that the Grid is headed in an unfortunate and counterproductive direction so far as young learners are concerned.The argument claims that in its current form the Grid is likely to generate boredom among young people in terms of Grid-promoted on-line literacy practices, and to foster mislearningof important new forms of literacy, such as email and interactivity. Furthermore, Grid activities and approaches dumb down literacy acquisition, particularly acquisition of 'new literacies’, and impede development of personal responsibility for on-line actions. The authors claim that a major change in mindset will be necessary to reform the Grid in ways that are compatible with the official policy goals and aspirations behind its development. Examples are provided of more productive alternatives, together with concepts, principles and data supporting the judgments and suggestions advanced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-194
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Early Childhood Literacy
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2002

Fingerprint

literacy
learning
childhood
boredom
interactive media
reform
responsibility
resources

Keywords

  • literacy
  • on-line learning
  • technology

Cite this

@article{f342c901709b46a3a48b078db27f134e,
title = "Children, literacy and the Uk National Grid for Learning",
abstract = "This article presents a critical assessment from the standpoint of early childhood literacy of Britain’s ambitious and costly on-line learning resource, the National Grid for Learning. It provides an overview of the aims, scope and administration of the Grid, together with typical examples of content available for users in the early childhood age range (0–8 years).The authors argue that the Grid is headed in an unfortunate and counterproductive direction so far as young learners are concerned.The argument claims that in its current form the Grid is likely to generate boredom among young people in terms of Grid-promoted on-line literacy practices, and to foster mislearningof important new forms of literacy, such as email and interactivity. Furthermore, Grid activities and approaches dumb down literacy acquisition, particularly acquisition of 'new literacies’, and impede development of personal responsibility for on-line actions. The authors claim that a major change in mindset will be necessary to reform the Grid in ways that are compatible with the official policy goals and aspirations behind its development. Examples are provided of more productive alternatives, together with concepts, principles and data supporting the judgments and suggestions advanced.",
keywords = "literacy, on-line learning, technology",
author = "Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/14687984020022003",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "167--194",
journal = "Journal of Early Childhood Literacy",
issn = "1468-7984",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Children, literacy and the Uk National Grid for Learning. / Lankshear, Colin; Knobel, Michele.

In: Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.01.2002, p. 167-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children, literacy and the Uk National Grid for Learning

AU - Lankshear, Colin

AU - Knobel, Michele

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - This article presents a critical assessment from the standpoint of early childhood literacy of Britain’s ambitious and costly on-line learning resource, the National Grid for Learning. It provides an overview of the aims, scope and administration of the Grid, together with typical examples of content available for users in the early childhood age range (0–8 years).The authors argue that the Grid is headed in an unfortunate and counterproductive direction so far as young learners are concerned.The argument claims that in its current form the Grid is likely to generate boredom among young people in terms of Grid-promoted on-line literacy practices, and to foster mislearningof important new forms of literacy, such as email and interactivity. Furthermore, Grid activities and approaches dumb down literacy acquisition, particularly acquisition of 'new literacies’, and impede development of personal responsibility for on-line actions. The authors claim that a major change in mindset will be necessary to reform the Grid in ways that are compatible with the official policy goals and aspirations behind its development. Examples are provided of more productive alternatives, together with concepts, principles and data supporting the judgments and suggestions advanced.

AB - This article presents a critical assessment from the standpoint of early childhood literacy of Britain’s ambitious and costly on-line learning resource, the National Grid for Learning. It provides an overview of the aims, scope and administration of the Grid, together with typical examples of content available for users in the early childhood age range (0–8 years).The authors argue that the Grid is headed in an unfortunate and counterproductive direction so far as young learners are concerned.The argument claims that in its current form the Grid is likely to generate boredom among young people in terms of Grid-promoted on-line literacy practices, and to foster mislearningof important new forms of literacy, such as email and interactivity. Furthermore, Grid activities and approaches dumb down literacy acquisition, particularly acquisition of 'new literacies’, and impede development of personal responsibility for on-line actions. The authors claim that a major change in mindset will be necessary to reform the Grid in ways that are compatible with the official policy goals and aspirations behind its development. Examples are provided of more productive alternatives, together with concepts, principles and data supporting the judgments and suggestions advanced.

KW - literacy

KW - on-line learning

KW - technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993728942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/14687984020022003

DO - 10.1177/14687984020022003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84993728942

VL - 2

SP - 167

EP - 194

JO - Journal of Early Childhood Literacy

JF - Journal of Early Childhood Literacy

SN - 1468-7984

IS - 2

ER -