Children's judgements about common classroom punishments

Shannon R. Brinker, Sara Goldstein, Mane S. Tisak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study examines children's thinking about common classroom punishments. Participants (45 third- and fifth-grade students) were asked questions pertaining to the frequency and effectiveness of teacher-executed punishments for two types of classroom misbehaviours. One misbehaviour was a moral infraction (stealing), and the other misbehaviour was a conventional transgression (chewing gum in the classroom). Two types of punishments were measured: presentation (presenting child with unpleasant stimuli) and removal (removing pleasant stimuli or taking away a privilege). Results indicate that children perceived presentation punishments, as compared to removal punishments, as occurring more often. Additionally, children rated presentation punishments as being more effective than removal punishments. Children also differed in their judgements about removal punishments depending on whether the invoking behaviour was moral or conventional. For example, children believed removal punishments were more effective in light of a moral violation, as compared to a conventional transgression. Applied and theoretical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-198
Number of pages10
JournalEducational Research
Volume45
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2003

Fingerprint

penalty
classroom
stimulus
privilege
teacher

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Development
  • Judgements
  • Misbehaviours
  • Punishments
  • Teachers

Cite this

Brinker, Shannon R. ; Goldstein, Sara ; Tisak, Mane S. / Children's judgements about common classroom punishments. In: Educational Research. 2003 ; Vol. 45, No. 2. pp. 189-198.
@article{84418efda6394a928cc6997795c5d3c3,
title = "Children's judgements about common classroom punishments",
abstract = "The present study examines children's thinking about common classroom punishments. Participants (45 third- and fifth-grade students) were asked questions pertaining to the frequency and effectiveness of teacher-executed punishments for two types of classroom misbehaviours. One misbehaviour was a moral infraction (stealing), and the other misbehaviour was a conventional transgression (chewing gum in the classroom). Two types of punishments were measured: presentation (presenting child with unpleasant stimuli) and removal (removing pleasant stimuli or taking away a privilege). Results indicate that children perceived presentation punishments, as compared to removal punishments, as occurring more often. Additionally, children rated presentation punishments as being more effective than removal punishments. Children also differed in their judgements about removal punishments depending on whether the invoking behaviour was moral or conventional. For example, children believed removal punishments were more effective in light of a moral violation, as compared to a conventional transgression. Applied and theoretical implications are discussed.",
keywords = "Cognition, Development, Judgements, Misbehaviours, Punishments, Teachers",
author = "Brinker, {Shannon R.} and Sara Goldstein and Tisak, {Mane S.}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "189--198",
journal = "Educational Research",
issn = "0013-1881",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Brinker, SR, Goldstein, S & Tisak, MS 2003, 'Children's judgements about common classroom punishments', Educational Research, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 189-198.

Children's judgements about common classroom punishments. / Brinker, Shannon R.; Goldstein, Sara; Tisak, Mane S.

In: Educational Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.06.2003, p. 189-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children's judgements about common classroom punishments

AU - Brinker, Shannon R.

AU - Goldstein, Sara

AU - Tisak, Mane S.

PY - 2003/6/1

Y1 - 2003/6/1

N2 - The present study examines children's thinking about common classroom punishments. Participants (45 third- and fifth-grade students) were asked questions pertaining to the frequency and effectiveness of teacher-executed punishments for two types of classroom misbehaviours. One misbehaviour was a moral infraction (stealing), and the other misbehaviour was a conventional transgression (chewing gum in the classroom). Two types of punishments were measured: presentation (presenting child with unpleasant stimuli) and removal (removing pleasant stimuli or taking away a privilege). Results indicate that children perceived presentation punishments, as compared to removal punishments, as occurring more often. Additionally, children rated presentation punishments as being more effective than removal punishments. Children also differed in their judgements about removal punishments depending on whether the invoking behaviour was moral or conventional. For example, children believed removal punishments were more effective in light of a moral violation, as compared to a conventional transgression. Applied and theoretical implications are discussed.

AB - The present study examines children's thinking about common classroom punishments. Participants (45 third- and fifth-grade students) were asked questions pertaining to the frequency and effectiveness of teacher-executed punishments for two types of classroom misbehaviours. One misbehaviour was a moral infraction (stealing), and the other misbehaviour was a conventional transgression (chewing gum in the classroom). Two types of punishments were measured: presentation (presenting child with unpleasant stimuli) and removal (removing pleasant stimuli or taking away a privilege). Results indicate that children perceived presentation punishments, as compared to removal punishments, as occurring more often. Additionally, children rated presentation punishments as being more effective than removal punishments. Children also differed in their judgements about removal punishments depending on whether the invoking behaviour was moral or conventional. For example, children believed removal punishments were more effective in light of a moral violation, as compared to a conventional transgression. Applied and theoretical implications are discussed.

KW - Cognition

KW - Development

KW - Judgements

KW - Misbehaviours

KW - Punishments

KW - Teachers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038719162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0038719162

VL - 45

SP - 189

EP - 198

JO - Educational Research

JF - Educational Research

SN - 0013-1881

IS - 2

ER -