Children's performance on ground rules questions: Implications for forensic interviewing

Jason Dickinson, Sonja P. Brubacher, Debra A. Poole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ground rules, also called interview instructions, are included in investigative interviews with children around the world. These rules aim to manage the expectations of children who are typically unaccustomed to being questioned by adults who are naïve to the children's experiences. Although analog research has examined the efficacy of ground rules instruction, a systematic analysis of children's ability to respond appropriately to each of the rules has not been reported. In the current study, we scored the accuracy of children's (N = 501, 4 to 12 years) responses to 5 ground rules practice questions (e.g., What is my dog's name?) and 2 questions that asked whether they would follow the rules, and then assigned inaccurate responses to 1 of several error categories. Few children answered every question correctly, but their performance on individual questions was encouraging. As expected, there were marked differences in children's understanding across ground rules questions (especially among the younger children), with Don't guess and Tell the truth rules being the easiest to comprehend. Together with evidence that ground rules instruction takes little time to deliver (typically 2 to 4 min) and is associated with improved accuracy in previous research, these findings support the use of ground rules in investigative interviews of children 4 years and older.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-97
Number of pages11
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

performance
Interviews
instruction
interview
Interviewing
Research
Names
Dogs
ability
evidence
experience

Keywords

  • children
  • forensic interviewing
  • Ground rules
  • interview instructions

Cite this

@article{8a065513d42b4fa9887701cb73b1ccc1,
title = "Children's performance on ground rules questions: Implications for forensic interviewing",
abstract = "Ground rules, also called interview instructions, are included in investigative interviews with children around the world. These rules aim to manage the expectations of children who are typically unaccustomed to being questioned by adults who are na{\"i}ve to the children's experiences. Although analog research has examined the efficacy of ground rules instruction, a systematic analysis of children's ability to respond appropriately to each of the rules has not been reported. In the current study, we scored the accuracy of children's (N = 501, 4 to 12 years) responses to 5 ground rules practice questions (e.g., What is my dog's name?) and 2 questions that asked whether they would follow the rules, and then assigned inaccurate responses to 1 of several error categories. Few children answered every question correctly, but their performance on individual questions was encouraging. As expected, there were marked differences in children's understanding across ground rules questions (especially among the younger children), with Don't guess and Tell the truth rules being the easiest to comprehend. Together with evidence that ground rules instruction takes little time to deliver (typically 2 to 4 min) and is associated with improved accuracy in previous research, these findings support the use of ground rules in investigative interviews of children 4 years and older.",
keywords = "children, forensic interviewing, Ground rules, interview instructions",
author = "Jason Dickinson and Brubacher, {Sonja P.} and Poole, {Debra A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/lhb0000119",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "87--97",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Children's performance on ground rules questions : Implications for forensic interviewing. / Dickinson, Jason; Brubacher, Sonja P.; Poole, Debra A.

In: Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 87-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children's performance on ground rules questions

T2 - Implications for forensic interviewing

AU - Dickinson, Jason

AU - Brubacher, Sonja P.

AU - Poole, Debra A.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Ground rules, also called interview instructions, are included in investigative interviews with children around the world. These rules aim to manage the expectations of children who are typically unaccustomed to being questioned by adults who are naïve to the children's experiences. Although analog research has examined the efficacy of ground rules instruction, a systematic analysis of children's ability to respond appropriately to each of the rules has not been reported. In the current study, we scored the accuracy of children's (N = 501, 4 to 12 years) responses to 5 ground rules practice questions (e.g., What is my dog's name?) and 2 questions that asked whether they would follow the rules, and then assigned inaccurate responses to 1 of several error categories. Few children answered every question correctly, but their performance on individual questions was encouraging. As expected, there were marked differences in children's understanding across ground rules questions (especially among the younger children), with Don't guess and Tell the truth rules being the easiest to comprehend. Together with evidence that ground rules instruction takes little time to deliver (typically 2 to 4 min) and is associated with improved accuracy in previous research, these findings support the use of ground rules in investigative interviews of children 4 years and older.

AB - Ground rules, also called interview instructions, are included in investigative interviews with children around the world. These rules aim to manage the expectations of children who are typically unaccustomed to being questioned by adults who are naïve to the children's experiences. Although analog research has examined the efficacy of ground rules instruction, a systematic analysis of children's ability to respond appropriately to each of the rules has not been reported. In the current study, we scored the accuracy of children's (N = 501, 4 to 12 years) responses to 5 ground rules practice questions (e.g., What is my dog's name?) and 2 questions that asked whether they would follow the rules, and then assigned inaccurate responses to 1 of several error categories. Few children answered every question correctly, but their performance on individual questions was encouraging. As expected, there were marked differences in children's understanding across ground rules questions (especially among the younger children), with Don't guess and Tell the truth rules being the easiest to comprehend. Together with evidence that ground rules instruction takes little time to deliver (typically 2 to 4 min) and is associated with improved accuracy in previous research, these findings support the use of ground rules in investigative interviews of children 4 years and older.

KW - children

KW - forensic interviewing

KW - Ground rules

KW - interview instructions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925649108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/lhb0000119

DO - 10.1037/lhb0000119

M3 - Article

C2 - 25642973

AN - SCOPUS:84925649108

VL - 39

SP - 87

EP - 97

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 1

ER -