Children's response, landmark, and metric strategies in spatial navigation

Jennifer Yang, Edward C. Merrill, Qi Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When interacting with the environment, one can encode spatial information via egocentric or allocentric perspectives. Allocentric processing can include both landmark and geometric information. The current study examined egocentric response-focused, allocentric landmark-focused, and allocentric metric-focused processing strategies in large-scale spatial environments among 38 children aged 6–8 years, 31 children aged 9 and 10 years, and 53 young adults. The current study used a new testing paradigm that made it possible to investigate all three spatial strategies in the same setting. Participants completed a series of experiments in a modified radial arm maze. By systematically changing the starting locations and landmark arrangements, the current study gradually manipulated the reliability and availability of egocentric response and landmark information while maintaining valid metric information. Overall, adults performed better than younger children, with older children performing at an intermediate level. All three groups were able to abandon the egocentric strategy when it became ineffective (Experiment 2) and to apply a landmark strategy flexibly (Experiment 3). Children demonstrated better performance than previous research has indicated. Nevertheless, the adults were more effective in using metric strategies than the two child groups (Experiment 4 and supplemental experiments). Our study suggested that in complex problem-solving situations, metric strategies were more difficult to acquire than the other two strategies and had a longer period of development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-101
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume181
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Spatial Navigation
Young Adult
Research

Keywords

  • Children
  • Landmark
  • Metric
  • Radial arm maze
  • Spatial learning
  • Strategy
  • Wayfinding

Cite this

@article{e8f6405a967a49fe8bb4757134ddf787,
title = "Children's response, landmark, and metric strategies in spatial navigation",
abstract = "When interacting with the environment, one can encode spatial information via egocentric or allocentric perspectives. Allocentric processing can include both landmark and geometric information. The current study examined egocentric response-focused, allocentric landmark-focused, and allocentric metric-focused processing strategies in large-scale spatial environments among 38 children aged 6–8 years, 31 children aged 9 and 10 years, and 53 young adults. The current study used a new testing paradigm that made it possible to investigate all three spatial strategies in the same setting. Participants completed a series of experiments in a modified radial arm maze. By systematically changing the starting locations and landmark arrangements, the current study gradually manipulated the reliability and availability of egocentric response and landmark information while maintaining valid metric information. Overall, adults performed better than younger children, with older children performing at an intermediate level. All three groups were able to abandon the egocentric strategy when it became ineffective (Experiment 2) and to apply a landmark strategy flexibly (Experiment 3). Children demonstrated better performance than previous research has indicated. Nevertheless, the adults were more effective in using metric strategies than the two child groups (Experiment 4 and supplemental experiments). Our study suggested that in complex problem-solving situations, metric strategies were more difficult to acquire than the other two strategies and had a longer period of development.",
keywords = "Children, Landmark, Metric, Radial arm maze, Spatial learning, Strategy, Wayfinding",
author = "Jennifer Yang and Merrill, {Edward C.} and Qi Wang",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.005",
language = "English",
volume = "181",
pages = "75--101",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology",
issn = "0022-0965",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Children's response, landmark, and metric strategies in spatial navigation. / Yang, Jennifer; Merrill, Edward C.; Wang, Qi.

In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 181, 01.05.2019, p. 75-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children's response, landmark, and metric strategies in spatial navigation

AU - Yang, Jennifer

AU - Merrill, Edward C.

AU - Wang, Qi

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - When interacting with the environment, one can encode spatial information via egocentric or allocentric perspectives. Allocentric processing can include both landmark and geometric information. The current study examined egocentric response-focused, allocentric landmark-focused, and allocentric metric-focused processing strategies in large-scale spatial environments among 38 children aged 6–8 years, 31 children aged 9 and 10 years, and 53 young adults. The current study used a new testing paradigm that made it possible to investigate all three spatial strategies in the same setting. Participants completed a series of experiments in a modified radial arm maze. By systematically changing the starting locations and landmark arrangements, the current study gradually manipulated the reliability and availability of egocentric response and landmark information while maintaining valid metric information. Overall, adults performed better than younger children, with older children performing at an intermediate level. All three groups were able to abandon the egocentric strategy when it became ineffective (Experiment 2) and to apply a landmark strategy flexibly (Experiment 3). Children demonstrated better performance than previous research has indicated. Nevertheless, the adults were more effective in using metric strategies than the two child groups (Experiment 4 and supplemental experiments). Our study suggested that in complex problem-solving situations, metric strategies were more difficult to acquire than the other two strategies and had a longer period of development.

AB - When interacting with the environment, one can encode spatial information via egocentric or allocentric perspectives. Allocentric processing can include both landmark and geometric information. The current study examined egocentric response-focused, allocentric landmark-focused, and allocentric metric-focused processing strategies in large-scale spatial environments among 38 children aged 6–8 years, 31 children aged 9 and 10 years, and 53 young adults. The current study used a new testing paradigm that made it possible to investigate all three spatial strategies in the same setting. Participants completed a series of experiments in a modified radial arm maze. By systematically changing the starting locations and landmark arrangements, the current study gradually manipulated the reliability and availability of egocentric response and landmark information while maintaining valid metric information. Overall, adults performed better than younger children, with older children performing at an intermediate level. All three groups were able to abandon the egocentric strategy when it became ineffective (Experiment 2) and to apply a landmark strategy flexibly (Experiment 3). Children demonstrated better performance than previous research has indicated. Nevertheless, the adults were more effective in using metric strategies than the two child groups (Experiment 4 and supplemental experiments). Our study suggested that in complex problem-solving situations, metric strategies were more difficult to acquire than the other two strategies and had a longer period of development.

KW - Children

KW - Landmark

KW - Metric

KW - Radial arm maze

KW - Spatial learning

KW - Strategy

KW - Wayfinding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060920087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 30731362

AN - SCOPUS:85060920087

VL - 181

SP - 75

EP - 101

JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

SN - 0022-0965

ER -