Children's strategies for interpreting complex comparative questions

David Townsend, Melinda Erb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fifty-four children aged between 3 and 6 were asked questions such as 'Which box is Xer than it is Z?,' where Xer was taller, shorter, fatter, or thinner and Z was tall or fat, in the context of five rectangles of varying dimensions. For most questions, the largest rectangle was chosen most often as an answer, regardless of the adjectives used. The older children often chose the Xest rectangle in the array, indicating interpretation of only the first clause of the question. After providing feedback on incorrect answers for the five-year-old children, a post-test showed a decrease in frequency of choices of the largest rectangle, no change in frequency of choices of the Xest rectangle, and, for some questions, an increase in the frequency of choices of the correct rectangle. The results are interpreted to mean that the linguistic strategy of attending to the first clause is more resistant to change than the more primitive non-linguistic preference for choosing the largest object without interpreting the sentence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-277
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Child Language
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1975

Fingerprint

Fats
Linguistics
linguistics
interpretation
Fat
Clause
Adjective

Cite this

Townsend, David ; Erb, Melinda. / Children's strategies for interpreting complex comparative questions. In: Journal of Child Language. 1975 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 271-277.
@article{e408777c8a5043738c14c55a55e02838,
title = "Children's strategies for interpreting complex comparative questions",
abstract = "Fifty-four children aged between 3 and 6 were asked questions such as 'Which box is Xer than it is Z?,' where Xer was taller, shorter, fatter, or thinner and Z was tall or fat, in the context of five rectangles of varying dimensions. For most questions, the largest rectangle was chosen most often as an answer, regardless of the adjectives used. The older children often chose the Xest rectangle in the array, indicating interpretation of only the first clause of the question. After providing feedback on incorrect answers for the five-year-old children, a post-test showed a decrease in frequency of choices of the largest rectangle, no change in frequency of choices of the Xest rectangle, and, for some questions, an increase in the frequency of choices of the correct rectangle. The results are interpreted to mean that the linguistic strategy of attending to the first clause is more resistant to change than the more primitive non-linguistic preference for choosing the largest object without interpreting the sentence.",
author = "David Townsend and Melinda Erb",
year = "1975",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0305000900001094",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "271--277",
journal = "Journal of Child Language",
issn = "0305-0009",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Children's strategies for interpreting complex comparative questions. / Townsend, David; Erb, Melinda.

In: Journal of Child Language, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.01.1975, p. 271-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children's strategies for interpreting complex comparative questions

AU - Townsend, David

AU - Erb, Melinda

PY - 1975/1/1

Y1 - 1975/1/1

N2 - Fifty-four children aged between 3 and 6 were asked questions such as 'Which box is Xer than it is Z?,' where Xer was taller, shorter, fatter, or thinner and Z was tall or fat, in the context of five rectangles of varying dimensions. For most questions, the largest rectangle was chosen most often as an answer, regardless of the adjectives used. The older children often chose the Xest rectangle in the array, indicating interpretation of only the first clause of the question. After providing feedback on incorrect answers for the five-year-old children, a post-test showed a decrease in frequency of choices of the largest rectangle, no change in frequency of choices of the Xest rectangle, and, for some questions, an increase in the frequency of choices of the correct rectangle. The results are interpreted to mean that the linguistic strategy of attending to the first clause is more resistant to change than the more primitive non-linguistic preference for choosing the largest object without interpreting the sentence.

AB - Fifty-four children aged between 3 and 6 were asked questions such as 'Which box is Xer than it is Z?,' where Xer was taller, shorter, fatter, or thinner and Z was tall or fat, in the context of five rectangles of varying dimensions. For most questions, the largest rectangle was chosen most often as an answer, regardless of the adjectives used. The older children often chose the Xest rectangle in the array, indicating interpretation of only the first clause of the question. After providing feedback on incorrect answers for the five-year-old children, a post-test showed a decrease in frequency of choices of the largest rectangle, no change in frequency of choices of the Xest rectangle, and, for some questions, an increase in the frequency of choices of the correct rectangle. The results are interpreted to mean that the linguistic strategy of attending to the first clause is more resistant to change than the more primitive non-linguistic preference for choosing the largest object without interpreting the sentence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26844441266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0305000900001094

DO - 10.1017/S0305000900001094

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:26844441266

VL - 2

SP - 271

EP - 277

JO - Journal of Child Language

JF - Journal of Child Language

SN - 0305-0009

IS - 2

ER -