Closed-End Funds and Turnover Restrictions

Nusret Cakici, Anthony Tessitore, Nilufer Usmen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Past studies have found that investors can earn higher returns than a benchmark by purchasing shares of closed-end funds with discounts or selling shares with premiums. These studies either ignored the impact of transaction costs or used equally weighted portfolio strategies without controls on turnover or transaction costs. We examined whether constraining the holdings of individual funds and turnover has any bearing on the excess returns earned by closed-end equity funds over a benchmark return. We found that when transaction costs were low, portfolios with frequent rebalancing and loose turnover constraints outperformed the benchmark and other portfolios in the period we studied. We found, in contrast, that when transaction costs were moderate to high, portfolios with less-frequent rebalancing and tight turnover constraints outperformed the benchmark and other portfolios. The implication for the portfolio manager is that excess returns may be achieved in a variety of trading-cost environments with the proper mix of policy variables.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-81
Number of pages8
JournalFinancial Analysts Journal
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2002


Dive into the research topics of 'Closed-End Funds and Turnover Restrictions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this