Collaborative reasoning

A dialogic approach to group discussions

Alina Reznitskaya, Li Jen Kuo, Ann Marie Clark, Brian Miller, May Jadallah, Richard C. Anderson, Kim Nguyen-Jahiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we address the need to develop an empirically-based understanding of the use of dialogue in teaching by discussing theory and research related to a pedagogical approach called collaborative reasoning (CR). CR is an instructional method designed to engage elementary school children in group discussions about controversial issues raised in their readings. CR is grounded in social learning and schema-theoretic views of cognition, which are integrated to form a new model, called argument schema theory (AST). According to AST, students acquire generalizable knowledge of argumentation, or an argument schema, through participating in dialogic discussions with their peers. The article reviews empirical evidence from a variety of studies designed to evaluate the educational potential of dialogic interactions. The studies investigated group processes during CR discussions, individual student outcomes following participation in discussions, and the connections between the features of social interaction and individual student performance. We conclude that, despite its complexity, classroom dialogue can serve as a useful mechanism for promoting the development of individual argumentation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-48
Number of pages20
JournalCambridge Journal of Education
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2009

Fingerprint

group discussion
argumentation
dialogue
student
social learning
study group
interaction
schoolchild
elementary school
cognition
classroom
participation
Teaching
performance
evidence

Keywords

  • Classroom communication
  • Grouping

Cite this

Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L. J., Clark, A. M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701952
Reznitskaya, Alina ; Kuo, Li Jen ; Clark, Ann Marie ; Miller, Brian ; Jadallah, May ; Anderson, Richard C. ; Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim. / Collaborative reasoning : A dialogic approach to group discussions. In: Cambridge Journal of Education. 2009 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 29-48.
@article{1fba86fc18c041c4ad0c9878799e789d,
title = "Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions",
abstract = "In this paper, we address the need to develop an empirically-based understanding of the use of dialogue in teaching by discussing theory and research related to a pedagogical approach called collaborative reasoning (CR). CR is an instructional method designed to engage elementary school children in group discussions about controversial issues raised in their readings. CR is grounded in social learning and schema-theoretic views of cognition, which are integrated to form a new model, called argument schema theory (AST). According to AST, students acquire generalizable knowledge of argumentation, or an argument schema, through participating in dialogic discussions with their peers. The article reviews empirical evidence from a variety of studies designed to evaluate the educational potential of dialogic interactions. The studies investigated group processes during CR discussions, individual student outcomes following participation in discussions, and the connections between the features of social interaction and individual student performance. We conclude that, despite its complexity, classroom dialogue can serve as a useful mechanism for promoting the development of individual argumentation.",
keywords = "Classroom communication, Grouping",
author = "Alina Reznitskaya and Kuo, {Li Jen} and Clark, {Ann Marie} and Brian Miller and May Jadallah and Anderson, {Richard C.} and Kim Nguyen-Jahiel",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03057640802701952",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "29--48",
journal = "Cambridge Journal of Education",
issn = "0305-764X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Reznitskaya, A, Kuo, LJ, Clark, AM, Miller, B, Jadallah, M, Anderson, RC & Nguyen-Jahiel, K 2009, 'Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions', Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701952

Collaborative reasoning : A dialogic approach to group discussions. / Reznitskaya, Alina; Kuo, Li Jen; Clark, Ann Marie; Miller, Brian; Jadallah, May; Anderson, Richard C.; Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim.

In: Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.03.2009, p. 29-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative reasoning

T2 - A dialogic approach to group discussions

AU - Reznitskaya, Alina

AU - Kuo, Li Jen

AU - Clark, Ann Marie

AU - Miller, Brian

AU - Jadallah, May

AU - Anderson, Richard C.

AU - Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - In this paper, we address the need to develop an empirically-based understanding of the use of dialogue in teaching by discussing theory and research related to a pedagogical approach called collaborative reasoning (CR). CR is an instructional method designed to engage elementary school children in group discussions about controversial issues raised in their readings. CR is grounded in social learning and schema-theoretic views of cognition, which are integrated to form a new model, called argument schema theory (AST). According to AST, students acquire generalizable knowledge of argumentation, or an argument schema, through participating in dialogic discussions with their peers. The article reviews empirical evidence from a variety of studies designed to evaluate the educational potential of dialogic interactions. The studies investigated group processes during CR discussions, individual student outcomes following participation in discussions, and the connections between the features of social interaction and individual student performance. We conclude that, despite its complexity, classroom dialogue can serve as a useful mechanism for promoting the development of individual argumentation.

AB - In this paper, we address the need to develop an empirically-based understanding of the use of dialogue in teaching by discussing theory and research related to a pedagogical approach called collaborative reasoning (CR). CR is an instructional method designed to engage elementary school children in group discussions about controversial issues raised in their readings. CR is grounded in social learning and schema-theoretic views of cognition, which are integrated to form a new model, called argument schema theory (AST). According to AST, students acquire generalizable knowledge of argumentation, or an argument schema, through participating in dialogic discussions with their peers. The article reviews empirical evidence from a variety of studies designed to evaluate the educational potential of dialogic interactions. The studies investigated group processes during CR discussions, individual student outcomes following participation in discussions, and the connections between the features of social interaction and individual student performance. We conclude that, despite its complexity, classroom dialogue can serve as a useful mechanism for promoting the development of individual argumentation.

KW - Classroom communication

KW - Grouping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67749101504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03057640802701952

DO - 10.1080/03057640802701952

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 29

EP - 48

JO - Cambridge Journal of Education

JF - Cambridge Journal of Education

SN - 0305-764X

IS - 1

ER -