Coming together: New taxonomies for the analysis of social relations

Karen A. Cerulo, Janet Ruane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In previous work, we have noted a certain rigidity in sociology's approach to the topic of social relations (Cerulo 1997; Cerulo and Ruane 1997; Cerulo, Ruane, and Chayko 1992). With few exceptions, literature on the subject dichotomizes social relations with reference to the scope of the interaction (small group versus large group) and the mode by which social actors connect (direct connections versus mediated connections). Further, many researchers implicitly rank the social value of each relational form. Sociologists typically identify a society's primary and most valuable relations as the result of direct, physically copresent exchange, exchange involving relatively few interactants. In contrast, secondary relations often are characterized as faceless, impersonal, ingenuous, and fleeting - the result of large-group exchange established via mediated or mechanized connections. Cerulo (1997) suggested the need to reformulate any definition of social relations built upon the small group/large group or the direct/mediated dichotomies. She presented several critical elements upon which new definitions could be built. In this piece, we configure those elements, building six new analytic taxonomies - tools we hope will provoke a richer discussion of connecting, interacting, and resulting forms of social relations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)398-425
Number of pages28
JournalSociological Inquiry
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1998

Fingerprint

taxonomy
Social Relations
small group
new building
Group
rigidity
social actor
sociologist
sociology
interaction
society
Values

Cite this

@article{112c84aa56884c41b491e743aa847cee,
title = "Coming together: New taxonomies for the analysis of social relations",
abstract = "In previous work, we have noted a certain rigidity in sociology's approach to the topic of social relations (Cerulo 1997; Cerulo and Ruane 1997; Cerulo, Ruane, and Chayko 1992). With few exceptions, literature on the subject dichotomizes social relations with reference to the scope of the interaction (small group versus large group) and the mode by which social actors connect (direct connections versus mediated connections). Further, many researchers implicitly rank the social value of each relational form. Sociologists typically identify a society's primary and most valuable relations as the result of direct, physically copresent exchange, exchange involving relatively few interactants. In contrast, secondary relations often are characterized as faceless, impersonal, ingenuous, and fleeting - the result of large-group exchange established via mediated or mechanized connections. Cerulo (1997) suggested the need to reformulate any definition of social relations built upon the small group/large group or the direct/mediated dichotomies. She presented several critical elements upon which new definitions could be built. In this piece, we configure those elements, building six new analytic taxonomies - tools we hope will provoke a richer discussion of connecting, interacting, and resulting forms of social relations.",
author = "Cerulo, {Karen A.} and Janet Ruane",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-682X.1998.tb00475.x",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "398--425",
journal = "Sociological Inquiry",
issn = "0038-0245",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Coming together : New taxonomies for the analysis of social relations. / Cerulo, Karen A.; Ruane, Janet.

In: Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 68, No. 3, 01.01.1998, p. 398-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coming together

T2 - New taxonomies for the analysis of social relations

AU - Cerulo, Karen A.

AU - Ruane, Janet

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - In previous work, we have noted a certain rigidity in sociology's approach to the topic of social relations (Cerulo 1997; Cerulo and Ruane 1997; Cerulo, Ruane, and Chayko 1992). With few exceptions, literature on the subject dichotomizes social relations with reference to the scope of the interaction (small group versus large group) and the mode by which social actors connect (direct connections versus mediated connections). Further, many researchers implicitly rank the social value of each relational form. Sociologists typically identify a society's primary and most valuable relations as the result of direct, physically copresent exchange, exchange involving relatively few interactants. In contrast, secondary relations often are characterized as faceless, impersonal, ingenuous, and fleeting - the result of large-group exchange established via mediated or mechanized connections. Cerulo (1997) suggested the need to reformulate any definition of social relations built upon the small group/large group or the direct/mediated dichotomies. She presented several critical elements upon which new definitions could be built. In this piece, we configure those elements, building six new analytic taxonomies - tools we hope will provoke a richer discussion of connecting, interacting, and resulting forms of social relations.

AB - In previous work, we have noted a certain rigidity in sociology's approach to the topic of social relations (Cerulo 1997; Cerulo and Ruane 1997; Cerulo, Ruane, and Chayko 1992). With few exceptions, literature on the subject dichotomizes social relations with reference to the scope of the interaction (small group versus large group) and the mode by which social actors connect (direct connections versus mediated connections). Further, many researchers implicitly rank the social value of each relational form. Sociologists typically identify a society's primary and most valuable relations as the result of direct, physically copresent exchange, exchange involving relatively few interactants. In contrast, secondary relations often are characterized as faceless, impersonal, ingenuous, and fleeting - the result of large-group exchange established via mediated or mechanized connections. Cerulo (1997) suggested the need to reformulate any definition of social relations built upon the small group/large group or the direct/mediated dichotomies. She presented several critical elements upon which new definitions could be built. In this piece, we configure those elements, building six new analytic taxonomies - tools we hope will provoke a richer discussion of connecting, interacting, and resulting forms of social relations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032347523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1998.tb00475.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1998.tb00475.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032347523

VL - 68

SP - 398

EP - 425

JO - Sociological Inquiry

JF - Sociological Inquiry

SN - 0038-0245

IS - 3

ER -