Comparative Analysis of International Education Systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

International comparisons of educational systems are commonly practiced using subjective methods available in literature. The use of subjective methods can lead to non-standard ranking; each individual investigator inputs his or her own subjective judgment when assigning weights to measurements in each class. The complied results differ with large variations. A mathematical evaluation method based on concept of Paretooptimal organization is proposed for this study. This method is easy to apply and uses linear programming model. The weights for various measurements are determined through an objective method. We illustrate our methodology in a comparison of the educational systems of twenty-one industrialized countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS)
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Education
Linear programming
International education
Education system
Comparative analysis
Educational system

Keywords

  • Pareto optimization
  • education systems
  • international comparison
  • linear programming
  • multiple objective decision making

Cite this

@article{65afafacb7b1413b87cbcd29d9971832,
title = "Comparative Analysis of International Education Systems",
abstract = "International comparisons of educational systems are commonly practiced using subjective methods available in literature. The use of subjective methods can lead to non-standard ranking; each individual investigator inputs his or her own subjective judgment when assigning weights to measurements in each class. The complied results differ with large variations. A mathematical evaluation method based on concept of Paretooptimal organization is proposed for this study. This method is easy to apply and uses linear programming model. The weights for various measurements are determined through an objective method. We illustrate our methodology in a comparison of the educational systems of twenty-one industrialized countries.",
keywords = "Pareto optimization, education systems, international comparison, linear programming, multiple objective decision making",
author = "John Wang and Jun Xia and Kimberly Hollister and Yawei Wang",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4018/jisss.2009010101",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS)",
issn = "1935-5688",
publisher = "IGI Global Publishing",
number = "1",

}

Comparative Analysis of International Education Systems. / Wang, John; Xia, Jun; Hollister, Kimberly; Wang, Yawei.

In: International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Analysis of International Education Systems

AU - Wang, John

AU - Xia, Jun

AU - Hollister, Kimberly

AU - Wang, Yawei

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - International comparisons of educational systems are commonly practiced using subjective methods available in literature. The use of subjective methods can lead to non-standard ranking; each individual investigator inputs his or her own subjective judgment when assigning weights to measurements in each class. The complied results differ with large variations. A mathematical evaluation method based on concept of Paretooptimal organization is proposed for this study. This method is easy to apply and uses linear programming model. The weights for various measurements are determined through an objective method. We illustrate our methodology in a comparison of the educational systems of twenty-one industrialized countries.

AB - International comparisons of educational systems are commonly practiced using subjective methods available in literature. The use of subjective methods can lead to non-standard ranking; each individual investigator inputs his or her own subjective judgment when assigning weights to measurements in each class. The complied results differ with large variations. A mathematical evaluation method based on concept of Paretooptimal organization is proposed for this study. This method is easy to apply and uses linear programming model. The weights for various measurements are determined through an objective method. We illustrate our methodology in a comparison of the educational systems of twenty-one industrialized countries.

KW - Pareto optimization

KW - education systems

KW - international comparison

KW - linear programming

KW - multiple objective decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85001837111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4018/jisss.2009010101

DO - 10.4018/jisss.2009010101

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS)

JF - International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS)

SN - 1935-5688

IS - 1

ER -