Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast

Debra Zellner, Elizabeth A. Rohm, Terri L. Bassetti, Scott Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Test stimuli are rated less "good" following very good context stimuli than when presented either alone or following neutral context stimuli. This diminution in rating is called hedonic contrast. In two experiments, the degree of hedonic contrast depended on how subjects were instructed to categorize context and test stimuli. Contrast was substantially attenuated if context and test stimuli were said to belong to different categories. The effect was demonstrated for beverages (Experiment 1) and birds (Experiment 2). Stimuli's hedonic ratings were far less affected by other stimuli declared to belong to a different category than by stimuli declared to belong to a common category.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)468-473
Number of pages6
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2003

Fingerprint

Pleasure
Beverages
Birds
Stimulus

Cite this

Zellner, Debra ; Rohm, Elizabeth A. ; Bassetti, Terri L. ; Parker, Scott. / Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2003 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 468-473.
@article{53649d60624b49d9847412977ede44f1,
title = "Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast",
abstract = "Test stimuli are rated less {"}good{"} following very good context stimuli than when presented either alone or following neutral context stimuli. This diminution in rating is called hedonic contrast. In two experiments, the degree of hedonic contrast depended on how subjects were instructed to categorize context and test stimuli. Contrast was substantially attenuated if context and test stimuli were said to belong to different categories. The effect was demonstrated for beverages (Experiment 1) and birds (Experiment 2). Stimuli's hedonic ratings were far less affected by other stimuli declared to belong to a different category than by stimuli declared to belong to a common category.",
author = "Debra Zellner and Rohm, {Elizabeth A.} and Bassetti, {Terri L.} and Scott Parker",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03196508",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "468--473",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Zellner, D, Rohm, EA, Bassetti, TL & Parker, S 2003, 'Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast', Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 468-473. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196508

Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast. / Zellner, Debra; Rohm, Elizabeth A.; Bassetti, Terri L.; Parker, Scott.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.01.2003, p. 468-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast

AU - Zellner, Debra

AU - Rohm, Elizabeth A.

AU - Bassetti, Terri L.

AU - Parker, Scott

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Test stimuli are rated less "good" following very good context stimuli than when presented either alone or following neutral context stimuli. This diminution in rating is called hedonic contrast. In two experiments, the degree of hedonic contrast depended on how subjects were instructed to categorize context and test stimuli. Contrast was substantially attenuated if context and test stimuli were said to belong to different categories. The effect was demonstrated for beverages (Experiment 1) and birds (Experiment 2). Stimuli's hedonic ratings were far less affected by other stimuli declared to belong to a different category than by stimuli declared to belong to a common category.

AB - Test stimuli are rated less "good" following very good context stimuli than when presented either alone or following neutral context stimuli. This diminution in rating is called hedonic contrast. In two experiments, the degree of hedonic contrast depended on how subjects were instructed to categorize context and test stimuli. Contrast was substantially attenuated if context and test stimuli were said to belong to different categories. The effect was demonstrated for beverages (Experiment 1) and birds (Experiment 2). Stimuli's hedonic ratings were far less affected by other stimuli declared to belong to a different category than by stimuli declared to belong to a common category.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346271855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03196508

DO - 10.3758/BF03196508

M3 - Article

C2 - 12921426

AN - SCOPUS:0346271855

VL - 10

SP - 468

EP - 473

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 2

ER -