Comparing student experiences with story discussions in dialogic versus traditional settings

Alina Reznitskaya, Monica Glina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examined the testimonials of 60 elementary school students about their experience during class discussions of assigned readings. They randomly assigned 12 classrooms to 2 treatments: Philosophy for Children (P4C) and Regular Instruction. P4C is an alternative educational environment that places dialogue at the center of its pedagogy. Ten students from each classroom were interviewed. According to the results, significantly more P4C students stated that they enjoyed expressing disagreement with peers, taking on new responsibilities, and explaining their thinking to others. More P4C students complained about the difficulties with getting the floor to speak, and suggested that changes are needed to better balance group participation. The authors discuss these findings and suggest implications for research and teaching.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-63
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Educational Research
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 30 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

experience
student
classroom
elementary school
dialogue
instruction
responsibility
participation
Teaching
Group
philosophy

Keywords

  • Dialogic teaching
  • Educational innovations
  • Student perspectives

Cite this

@article{d567ec7ad2b64f4e89ef091c8bb1e9f7,
title = "Comparing student experiences with story discussions in dialogic versus traditional settings",
abstract = "The authors examined the testimonials of 60 elementary school students about their experience during class discussions of assigned readings. They randomly assigned 12 classrooms to 2 treatments: Philosophy for Children (P4C) and Regular Instruction. P4C is an alternative educational environment that places dialogue at the center of its pedagogy. Ten students from each classroom were interviewed. According to the results, significantly more P4C students stated that they enjoyed expressing disagreement with peers, taking on new responsibilities, and explaining their thinking to others. More P4C students complained about the difficulties with getting the floor to speak, and suggested that changes are needed to better balance group participation. The authors discuss these findings and suggest implications for research and teaching.",
keywords = "Dialogic teaching, Educational innovations, Student perspectives",
author = "Alina Reznitskaya and Monica Glina",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/00220671.2012.658458",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "49--63",
journal = "Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0022-0671",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Comparing student experiences with story discussions in dialogic versus traditional settings. / Reznitskaya, Alina; Glina, Monica.

In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 106, No. 1, 30.01.2013, p. 49-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing student experiences with story discussions in dialogic versus traditional settings

AU - Reznitskaya, Alina

AU - Glina, Monica

PY - 2013/1/30

Y1 - 2013/1/30

N2 - The authors examined the testimonials of 60 elementary school students about their experience during class discussions of assigned readings. They randomly assigned 12 classrooms to 2 treatments: Philosophy for Children (P4C) and Regular Instruction. P4C is an alternative educational environment that places dialogue at the center of its pedagogy. Ten students from each classroom were interviewed. According to the results, significantly more P4C students stated that they enjoyed expressing disagreement with peers, taking on new responsibilities, and explaining their thinking to others. More P4C students complained about the difficulties with getting the floor to speak, and suggested that changes are needed to better balance group participation. The authors discuss these findings and suggest implications for research and teaching.

AB - The authors examined the testimonials of 60 elementary school students about their experience during class discussions of assigned readings. They randomly assigned 12 classrooms to 2 treatments: Philosophy for Children (P4C) and Regular Instruction. P4C is an alternative educational environment that places dialogue at the center of its pedagogy. Ten students from each classroom were interviewed. According to the results, significantly more P4C students stated that they enjoyed expressing disagreement with peers, taking on new responsibilities, and explaining their thinking to others. More P4C students complained about the difficulties with getting the floor to speak, and suggested that changes are needed to better balance group participation. The authors discuss these findings and suggest implications for research and teaching.

KW - Dialogic teaching

KW - Educational innovations

KW - Student perspectives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872868602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00220671.2012.658458

DO - 10.1080/00220671.2012.658458

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 49

EP - 63

JO - Journal of Educational Research

JF - Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0022-0671

IS - 1

ER -