Configural processing and social judgments: Face inversion particularly disrupts inferences of human-relevant traits

John Paul Wilson, Steven G. Young, Nicholas O. Rule, Kurt Hugenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Perceivers tend to strongly agree about the basic trait information that they encode from faces. Although some research has found significant consistency for social inferences from faces viewed at multiple angles, disrupting configural processing can substantially alter the traits attributed to faces. Here, we reconciled these findings by examining how disruptions to configural processing (via face inversion) selectively impairs trait inferences from faces. Across four studies (including a pre-registered replication), we found that inverting faces disrupted inferences about particularly human-relevant traits (trustworthiness and humanness) more than it did for a trait relevant to both human and non-human animals (dominance). These findings contribute to emerging research linking configural processing to the humanization of social targets, helping to provide a clearer understanding of how visual cognition may moderate perceptions of humanness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume74
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

social judgement
humanization
trustworthiness
cognition
animal
Research
Cognition

Keywords

  • Configural processing
  • Person perception
  • Trait inferences

Cite this

@article{36c0fabd85434ac5a0a1a843780e55fd,
title = "Configural processing and social judgments: Face inversion particularly disrupts inferences of human-relevant traits",
abstract = "Perceivers tend to strongly agree about the basic trait information that they encode from faces. Although some research has found significant consistency for social inferences from faces viewed at multiple angles, disrupting configural processing can substantially alter the traits attributed to faces. Here, we reconciled these findings by examining how disruptions to configural processing (via face inversion) selectively impairs trait inferences from faces. Across four studies (including a pre-registered replication), we found that inverting faces disrupted inferences about particularly human-relevant traits (trustworthiness and humanness) more than it did for a trait relevant to both human and non-human animals (dominance). These findings contribute to emerging research linking configural processing to the humanization of social targets, helping to provide a clearer understanding of how visual cognition may moderate perceptions of humanness.",
keywords = "Configural processing, Person perception, Trait inferences",
author = "Wilson, {John Paul} and Young, {Steven G.} and Rule, {Nicholas O.} and Kurt Hugenberg",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Configural processing and social judgments : Face inversion particularly disrupts inferences of human-relevant traits. / Wilson, John Paul; Young, Steven G.; Rule, Nicholas O.; Hugenberg, Kurt.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 74, 01.01.2018, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Configural processing and social judgments

T2 - Face inversion particularly disrupts inferences of human-relevant traits

AU - Wilson, John Paul

AU - Young, Steven G.

AU - Rule, Nicholas O.

AU - Hugenberg, Kurt

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Perceivers tend to strongly agree about the basic trait information that they encode from faces. Although some research has found significant consistency for social inferences from faces viewed at multiple angles, disrupting configural processing can substantially alter the traits attributed to faces. Here, we reconciled these findings by examining how disruptions to configural processing (via face inversion) selectively impairs trait inferences from faces. Across four studies (including a pre-registered replication), we found that inverting faces disrupted inferences about particularly human-relevant traits (trustworthiness and humanness) more than it did for a trait relevant to both human and non-human animals (dominance). These findings contribute to emerging research linking configural processing to the humanization of social targets, helping to provide a clearer understanding of how visual cognition may moderate perceptions of humanness.

AB - Perceivers tend to strongly agree about the basic trait information that they encode from faces. Although some research has found significant consistency for social inferences from faces viewed at multiple angles, disrupting configural processing can substantially alter the traits attributed to faces. Here, we reconciled these findings by examining how disruptions to configural processing (via face inversion) selectively impairs trait inferences from faces. Across four studies (including a pre-registered replication), we found that inverting faces disrupted inferences about particularly human-relevant traits (trustworthiness and humanness) more than it did for a trait relevant to both human and non-human animals (dominance). These findings contribute to emerging research linking configural processing to the humanization of social targets, helping to provide a clearer understanding of how visual cognition may moderate perceptions of humanness.

KW - Configural processing

KW - Person perception

KW - Trait inferences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027851873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027851873

VL - 74

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -