Conflict and Compromise in Public Health Policy

Analysis of Changes Made to Five Competitive Food Legislative Proposals Prior to Adoption

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Competitive foods in schools have historically been scrutinized for their ubiquity and poor nutritional quality, leading many states to enact legislation limiting the availability and accessibility of these items. Evaluations of these policy approaches show their promise in improving the healthfulness of school food environments, considered an important strategy for reducing childhood obesity. Yet little is known about the decision-making processes by which such legislation is formed and adopted. Using a comparative case study design, this study describes and analyzes the policy formation processes surrounding five state-level competitive food bills introduced in 2009-2010. Data for each case were drawn from multiple key informant interviews and document reviews. Case studies were conducted, analyzed, and written independently using a standard protocol and were subsequently compared for recurring and unique themes. Abbreviated case studies and summary tables are provided. Results indicate that bill cost is a major barrier to achieving strong, health-promoting policy change. Additionally, findings reveal that supporters of stronger competitive food policies often concede to changes that weaken a bill in order to neutralize opposition and achieve stakeholder buy-in. These challenges suggest that continued research on the development, implementation, and evaluation of public health policies can contribute to the advancement of new strategies for effective health promotion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-86
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Education and Behavior
Volume42
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Policy Making
Public Policy
Health Policy
Public Health
Legislation
Food
Nutrition Policy
Pediatric Obesity
Nutritive Value
Health Promotion
Decision Making
Interviews
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research
Conflict (Psychology)
Public Health Policy
Compromise
Evaluation

Keywords

  • competitive foods
  • health promotion
  • obesity prevention
  • public health policy
  • state laws
  • structural approaches

Cite this

@article{0982711feebb4ed587bdad8c2515ff71,
title = "Conflict and Compromise in Public Health Policy: Analysis of Changes Made to Five Competitive Food Legislative Proposals Prior to Adoption",
abstract = "Competitive foods in schools have historically been scrutinized for their ubiquity and poor nutritional quality, leading many states to enact legislation limiting the availability and accessibility of these items. Evaluations of these policy approaches show their promise in improving the healthfulness of school food environments, considered an important strategy for reducing childhood obesity. Yet little is known about the decision-making processes by which such legislation is formed and adopted. Using a comparative case study design, this study describes and analyzes the policy formation processes surrounding five state-level competitive food bills introduced in 2009-2010. Data for each case were drawn from multiple key informant interviews and document reviews. Case studies were conducted, analyzed, and written independently using a standard protocol and were subsequently compared for recurring and unique themes. Abbreviated case studies and summary tables are provided. Results indicate that bill cost is a major barrier to achieving strong, health-promoting policy change. Additionally, findings reveal that supporters of stronger competitive food policies often concede to changes that weaken a bill in order to neutralize opposition and achieve stakeholder buy-in. These challenges suggest that continued research on the development, implementation, and evaluation of public health policies can contribute to the advancement of new strategies for effective health promotion.",
keywords = "competitive foods, health promotion, obesity prevention, public health policy, state laws, structural approaches",
author = "Lauren Dinour",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1177/1090198114568303",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "76--86",
journal = "Health Education and Behavior",
issn = "1090-1981",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

Conflict and Compromise in Public Health Policy : Analysis of Changes Made to Five Competitive Food Legislative Proposals Prior to Adoption. / Dinour, Lauren.

In: Health Education and Behavior, Vol. 42, 04.04.2015, p. 76-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict and Compromise in Public Health Policy

T2 - Analysis of Changes Made to Five Competitive Food Legislative Proposals Prior to Adoption

AU - Dinour, Lauren

PY - 2015/4/4

Y1 - 2015/4/4

N2 - Competitive foods in schools have historically been scrutinized for their ubiquity and poor nutritional quality, leading many states to enact legislation limiting the availability and accessibility of these items. Evaluations of these policy approaches show their promise in improving the healthfulness of school food environments, considered an important strategy for reducing childhood obesity. Yet little is known about the decision-making processes by which such legislation is formed and adopted. Using a comparative case study design, this study describes and analyzes the policy formation processes surrounding five state-level competitive food bills introduced in 2009-2010. Data for each case were drawn from multiple key informant interviews and document reviews. Case studies were conducted, analyzed, and written independently using a standard protocol and were subsequently compared for recurring and unique themes. Abbreviated case studies and summary tables are provided. Results indicate that bill cost is a major barrier to achieving strong, health-promoting policy change. Additionally, findings reveal that supporters of stronger competitive food policies often concede to changes that weaken a bill in order to neutralize opposition and achieve stakeholder buy-in. These challenges suggest that continued research on the development, implementation, and evaluation of public health policies can contribute to the advancement of new strategies for effective health promotion.

AB - Competitive foods in schools have historically been scrutinized for their ubiquity and poor nutritional quality, leading many states to enact legislation limiting the availability and accessibility of these items. Evaluations of these policy approaches show their promise in improving the healthfulness of school food environments, considered an important strategy for reducing childhood obesity. Yet little is known about the decision-making processes by which such legislation is formed and adopted. Using a comparative case study design, this study describes and analyzes the policy formation processes surrounding five state-level competitive food bills introduced in 2009-2010. Data for each case were drawn from multiple key informant interviews and document reviews. Case studies were conducted, analyzed, and written independently using a standard protocol and were subsequently compared for recurring and unique themes. Abbreviated case studies and summary tables are provided. Results indicate that bill cost is a major barrier to achieving strong, health-promoting policy change. Additionally, findings reveal that supporters of stronger competitive food policies often concede to changes that weaken a bill in order to neutralize opposition and achieve stakeholder buy-in. These challenges suggest that continued research on the development, implementation, and evaluation of public health policies can contribute to the advancement of new strategies for effective health promotion.

KW - competitive foods

KW - health promotion

KW - obesity prevention

KW - public health policy

KW - state laws

KW - structural approaches

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926331026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1090198114568303

DO - 10.1177/1090198114568303

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 76

EP - 86

JO - Health Education and Behavior

JF - Health Education and Behavior

SN - 1090-1981

ER -