Contested spaces of transitional justice

Legal empowerment in global post-conflict contexts revisited

Arnaud Kurze, Christopher Lamont, Simon Robins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article critically examines the concept of legal empowerment as it has been used with reference to transitional justice, mapping its rise and impact based on a selection of case studies. In recent decades, international transitional justice advocacy has evolved dramatically, with practice increasingly emphasising the centrality of criminal accountability for violence, precisely as more holistic approaches have emerged that have broadened the remit of transitional justice. Post-conflict justice advocates have thus become professionalised transitional justice entrepreneurs working on issues such as democratic transitions, rule of law and human rights. A legal empowerment discourse has emerged in a number of scholarly debates that discuss legalistic and normative issues related to the implementation of retributive and restorative justice mechanisms. In theory, the concept of legal empowerment addresses the issue of social exclusion in transitions, increasing the rights of the marginalised. In practice, however, legal empowerment has disappointed and raises several issues around its performance that are scrutinised in this article. Drawing on case studies in Nepal, Tunisia and Bosnia-Herzegovina the authors analyse issues related to agency, institutions and structure, and argue for a needs-centred, participatory approach in place of the rights-based legal empowerment concept.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-276
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Human Rights
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

empowerment
justice
legal usage
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Tunisia
holistic approach
Nepal
constitutional state
entrepreneur
human rights
exclusion
violence
responsibility
discourse
performance

Keywords

  • Grass-roots
  • Human rights
  • Legal empowerment
  • Transitional justice
  • Victims

Cite this

@article{2f035075fcd04ba69a6db9d6880ee0ac,
title = "Contested spaces of transitional justice: Legal empowerment in global post-conflict contexts revisited",
abstract = "This article critically examines the concept of legal empowerment as it has been used with reference to transitional justice, mapping its rise and impact based on a selection of case studies. In recent decades, international transitional justice advocacy has evolved dramatically, with practice increasingly emphasising the centrality of criminal accountability for violence, precisely as more holistic approaches have emerged that have broadened the remit of transitional justice. Post-conflict justice advocates have thus become professionalised transitional justice entrepreneurs working on issues such as democratic transitions, rule of law and human rights. A legal empowerment discourse has emerged in a number of scholarly debates that discuss legalistic and normative issues related to the implementation of retributive and restorative justice mechanisms. In theory, the concept of legal empowerment addresses the issue of social exclusion in transitions, increasing the rights of the marginalised. In practice, however, legal empowerment has disappointed and raises several issues around its performance that are scrutinised in this article. Drawing on case studies in Nepal, Tunisia and Bosnia-Herzegovina the authors analyse issues related to agency, institutions and structure, and argue for a needs-centred, participatory approach in place of the rights-based legal empowerment concept.",
keywords = "Grass-roots, Human rights, Legal empowerment, Transitional justice, Victims",
author = "Arnaud Kurze and Christopher Lamont and Simon Robins",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13642987.2015.1029342",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "260--276",
journal = "International Journal of Human Rights",
issn = "1364-2987",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Contested spaces of transitional justice : Legal empowerment in global post-conflict contexts revisited. / Kurze, Arnaud; Lamont, Christopher; Robins, Simon.

In: International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 19, No. 3, 03.04.2015, p. 260-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contested spaces of transitional justice

T2 - Legal empowerment in global post-conflict contexts revisited

AU - Kurze, Arnaud

AU - Lamont, Christopher

AU - Robins, Simon

PY - 2015/4/3

Y1 - 2015/4/3

N2 - This article critically examines the concept of legal empowerment as it has been used with reference to transitional justice, mapping its rise and impact based on a selection of case studies. In recent decades, international transitional justice advocacy has evolved dramatically, with practice increasingly emphasising the centrality of criminal accountability for violence, precisely as more holistic approaches have emerged that have broadened the remit of transitional justice. Post-conflict justice advocates have thus become professionalised transitional justice entrepreneurs working on issues such as democratic transitions, rule of law and human rights. A legal empowerment discourse has emerged in a number of scholarly debates that discuss legalistic and normative issues related to the implementation of retributive and restorative justice mechanisms. In theory, the concept of legal empowerment addresses the issue of social exclusion in transitions, increasing the rights of the marginalised. In practice, however, legal empowerment has disappointed and raises several issues around its performance that are scrutinised in this article. Drawing on case studies in Nepal, Tunisia and Bosnia-Herzegovina the authors analyse issues related to agency, institutions and structure, and argue for a needs-centred, participatory approach in place of the rights-based legal empowerment concept.

AB - This article critically examines the concept of legal empowerment as it has been used with reference to transitional justice, mapping its rise and impact based on a selection of case studies. In recent decades, international transitional justice advocacy has evolved dramatically, with practice increasingly emphasising the centrality of criminal accountability for violence, precisely as more holistic approaches have emerged that have broadened the remit of transitional justice. Post-conflict justice advocates have thus become professionalised transitional justice entrepreneurs working on issues such as democratic transitions, rule of law and human rights. A legal empowerment discourse has emerged in a number of scholarly debates that discuss legalistic and normative issues related to the implementation of retributive and restorative justice mechanisms. In theory, the concept of legal empowerment addresses the issue of social exclusion in transitions, increasing the rights of the marginalised. In practice, however, legal empowerment has disappointed and raises several issues around its performance that are scrutinised in this article. Drawing on case studies in Nepal, Tunisia and Bosnia-Herzegovina the authors analyse issues related to agency, institutions and structure, and argue for a needs-centred, participatory approach in place of the rights-based legal empowerment concept.

KW - Grass-roots

KW - Human rights

KW - Legal empowerment

KW - Transitional justice

KW - Victims

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930888462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13642987.2015.1029342

DO - 10.1080/13642987.2015.1029342

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 260

EP - 276

JO - International Journal of Human Rights

JF - International Journal of Human Rights

SN - 1364-2987

IS - 3

ER -