Damned if you do and damned if you don't

Assigning blame to victims regardless of their choice

Stephen Rice, Holly Hackett, David Trafimow, Gayle Hunt, Joshua Sandry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The just world literature implies that when someone is a victim of suffering, observers will somehow attribute the suffering to the behavior of the victim. In the current study, participants read a scenario about a person who had either converted or not converted to a new religion. This same person later either experienced no tragedy or was a victim of an unrelated brutal robbery which permanently disabled him. When the target person was victimized, participants were reluctant to attribute blame to the person or to his morality; however, they were quick to assign blame to the victim's choice to convert. Interestingly, even when the victim had not converted, participants still assigned blame to the decision to not convert.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-8
Number of pages4
JournalSocial Science Journal
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Psychological Stress
human being
Religion
morality
scenario
literature

Cite this

Rice, Stephen ; Hackett, Holly ; Trafimow, David ; Hunt, Gayle ; Sandry, Joshua. / Damned if you do and damned if you don't : Assigning blame to victims regardless of their choice. In: Social Science Journal. 2012 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 5-8.
@article{13e4904a291e45049759c0810d8964d8,
title = "Damned if you do and damned if you don't: Assigning blame to victims regardless of their choice",
abstract = "The just world literature implies that when someone is a victim of suffering, observers will somehow attribute the suffering to the behavior of the victim. In the current study, participants read a scenario about a person who had either converted or not converted to a new religion. This same person later either experienced no tragedy or was a victim of an unrelated brutal robbery which permanently disabled him. When the target person was victimized, participants were reluctant to attribute blame to the person or to his morality; however, they were quick to assign blame to the victim's choice to convert. Interestingly, even when the victim had not converted, participants still assigned blame to the decision to not convert.",
author = "Stephen Rice and Holly Hackett and David Trafimow and Gayle Hunt and Joshua Sandry",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.soscij.2011.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "5--8",
journal = "Social Science Journal",
issn = "0362-3319",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Damned if you do and damned if you don't : Assigning blame to victims regardless of their choice. / Rice, Stephen; Hackett, Holly; Trafimow, David; Hunt, Gayle; Sandry, Joshua.

In: Social Science Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 5-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Damned if you do and damned if you don't

T2 - Assigning blame to victims regardless of their choice

AU - Rice, Stephen

AU - Hackett, Holly

AU - Trafimow, David

AU - Hunt, Gayle

AU - Sandry, Joshua

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - The just world literature implies that when someone is a victim of suffering, observers will somehow attribute the suffering to the behavior of the victim. In the current study, participants read a scenario about a person who had either converted or not converted to a new religion. This same person later either experienced no tragedy or was a victim of an unrelated brutal robbery which permanently disabled him. When the target person was victimized, participants were reluctant to attribute blame to the person or to his morality; however, they were quick to assign blame to the victim's choice to convert. Interestingly, even when the victim had not converted, participants still assigned blame to the decision to not convert.

AB - The just world literature implies that when someone is a victim of suffering, observers will somehow attribute the suffering to the behavior of the victim. In the current study, participants read a scenario about a person who had either converted or not converted to a new religion. This same person later either experienced no tragedy or was a victim of an unrelated brutal robbery which permanently disabled him. When the target person was victimized, participants were reluctant to attribute blame to the person or to his morality; however, they were quick to assign blame to the victim's choice to convert. Interestingly, even when the victim had not converted, participants still assigned blame to the decision to not convert.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858283069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soscij.2011.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.soscij.2011.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 5

EP - 8

JO - Social Science Journal

JF - Social Science Journal

SN - 0362-3319

IS - 1

ER -