Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing

Rachel Scheperle, Viral D. Tejani, Julia K. Omtvedt, Carolyn J. Brown, Paul J. Abbas, Marlan R. Hansen, Bruce J. Gantz, Jacob J. Oleson, Marie V. Ozanne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This retrospective review explores delayed-onset hearing loss in 85 individuals receiving cochlear implants designed to preserve acoustic hearing at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 2001 and 2015. Repeated measures of unaided behavioral audiometric thresholds, electrode impedance, and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth functions were used to characterize longitudinal changes in auditory status. Participants were grouped into two primary categories according to changes in unaided behavioral thresholds: (1) stable hearing or symmetrical hearing loss and (2) delayed loss of hearing in the implanted ear. Thirty-eight percent of this sample presented with delayed-onset hearing loss of various degrees and rates of change. Neither array type nor insertion approach (round window or cochleostomy) had a significant effect on prevalence. Electrode impedance increased abruptly for many individuals exhibiting precipitous hearing loss; the increase was often transient. The impedance increases were significantly larger than the impedance changes observed for individuals with stable or symmetrical hearing loss. Moreover, the impedance changes were associated with changes in behavioral thresholds for individuals with a precipitous drop in behavioral thresholds. These findings suggest a change in the electrode environment coincident with the change in auditory status. Changes in ECAP thresholds, growth function slopes, and suprathreshold amplitudes were not correlated with changes in behavioral thresholds, suggesting that neural responsiveness in the region excited by the implant is relatively stable. Further exploration into etiology of delayed-onset hearing loss post implantation is needed, with particular interest in mechanisms associated with changes in the intracochlear environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-57
Number of pages13
JournalHearing Research
Volume350
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Hearing Loss
Acoustics
Hearing
Electric Impedance
Electrodes
Action Potentials
Growth
Ear

Keywords

  • Cochlear implant
  • Electrically evoked compound action potential
  • Electrode impedance
  • Hearing preservation

Cite this

Scheperle, R., Tejani, V. D., Omtvedt, J. K., Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Hansen, M. R., ... Ozanne, M. V. (2017). Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing. Hearing Research, 350, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.04.005
Scheperle, Rachel ; Tejani, Viral D. ; Omtvedt, Julia K. ; Brown, Carolyn J. ; Abbas, Paul J. ; Hansen, Marlan R. ; Gantz, Bruce J. ; Oleson, Jacob J. ; Ozanne, Marie V. / Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing. In: Hearing Research. 2017 ; Vol. 350. pp. 45-57.
@article{1f0f9dc382ac4aaaa1f24c42c4b32a31,
title = "Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing",
abstract = "This retrospective review explores delayed-onset hearing loss in 85 individuals receiving cochlear implants designed to preserve acoustic hearing at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 2001 and 2015. Repeated measures of unaided behavioral audiometric thresholds, electrode impedance, and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth functions were used to characterize longitudinal changes in auditory status. Participants were grouped into two primary categories according to changes in unaided behavioral thresholds: (1) stable hearing or symmetrical hearing loss and (2) delayed loss of hearing in the implanted ear. Thirty-eight percent of this sample presented with delayed-onset hearing loss of various degrees and rates of change. Neither array type nor insertion approach (round window or cochleostomy) had a significant effect on prevalence. Electrode impedance increased abruptly for many individuals exhibiting precipitous hearing loss; the increase was often transient. The impedance increases were significantly larger than the impedance changes observed for individuals with stable or symmetrical hearing loss. Moreover, the impedance changes were associated with changes in behavioral thresholds for individuals with a precipitous drop in behavioral thresholds. These findings suggest a change in the electrode environment coincident with the change in auditory status. Changes in ECAP thresholds, growth function slopes, and suprathreshold amplitudes were not correlated with changes in behavioral thresholds, suggesting that neural responsiveness in the region excited by the implant is relatively stable. Further exploration into etiology of delayed-onset hearing loss post implantation is needed, with particular interest in mechanisms associated with changes in the intracochlear environment.",
keywords = "Cochlear implant, Electrically evoked compound action potential, Electrode impedance, Hearing preservation",
author = "Rachel Scheperle and Tejani, {Viral D.} and Omtvedt, {Julia K.} and Brown, {Carolyn J.} and Abbas, {Paul J.} and Hansen, {Marlan R.} and Gantz, {Bruce J.} and Oleson, {Jacob J.} and Ozanne, {Marie V.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.heares.2017.04.005",
language = "English",
volume = "350",
pages = "45--57",
journal = "Hearing Research",
issn = "0378-5955",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Scheperle, R, Tejani, VD, Omtvedt, JK, Brown, CJ, Abbas, PJ, Hansen, MR, Gantz, BJ, Oleson, JJ & Ozanne, MV 2017, 'Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing', Hearing Research, vol. 350, pp. 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.04.005

Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing. / Scheperle, Rachel; Tejani, Viral D.; Omtvedt, Julia K.; Brown, Carolyn J.; Abbas, Paul J.; Hansen, Marlan R.; Gantz, Bruce J.; Oleson, Jacob J.; Ozanne, Marie V.

In: Hearing Research, Vol. 350, 01.07.2017, p. 45-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing

AU - Scheperle, Rachel

AU - Tejani, Viral D.

AU - Omtvedt, Julia K.

AU - Brown, Carolyn J.

AU - Abbas, Paul J.

AU - Hansen, Marlan R.

AU - Gantz, Bruce J.

AU - Oleson, Jacob J.

AU - Ozanne, Marie V.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - This retrospective review explores delayed-onset hearing loss in 85 individuals receiving cochlear implants designed to preserve acoustic hearing at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 2001 and 2015. Repeated measures of unaided behavioral audiometric thresholds, electrode impedance, and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth functions were used to characterize longitudinal changes in auditory status. Participants were grouped into two primary categories according to changes in unaided behavioral thresholds: (1) stable hearing or symmetrical hearing loss and (2) delayed loss of hearing in the implanted ear. Thirty-eight percent of this sample presented with delayed-onset hearing loss of various degrees and rates of change. Neither array type nor insertion approach (round window or cochleostomy) had a significant effect on prevalence. Electrode impedance increased abruptly for many individuals exhibiting precipitous hearing loss; the increase was often transient. The impedance increases were significantly larger than the impedance changes observed for individuals with stable or symmetrical hearing loss. Moreover, the impedance changes were associated with changes in behavioral thresholds for individuals with a precipitous drop in behavioral thresholds. These findings suggest a change in the electrode environment coincident with the change in auditory status. Changes in ECAP thresholds, growth function slopes, and suprathreshold amplitudes were not correlated with changes in behavioral thresholds, suggesting that neural responsiveness in the region excited by the implant is relatively stable. Further exploration into etiology of delayed-onset hearing loss post implantation is needed, with particular interest in mechanisms associated with changes in the intracochlear environment.

AB - This retrospective review explores delayed-onset hearing loss in 85 individuals receiving cochlear implants designed to preserve acoustic hearing at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 2001 and 2015. Repeated measures of unaided behavioral audiometric thresholds, electrode impedance, and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth functions were used to characterize longitudinal changes in auditory status. Participants were grouped into two primary categories according to changes in unaided behavioral thresholds: (1) stable hearing or symmetrical hearing loss and (2) delayed loss of hearing in the implanted ear. Thirty-eight percent of this sample presented with delayed-onset hearing loss of various degrees and rates of change. Neither array type nor insertion approach (round window or cochleostomy) had a significant effect on prevalence. Electrode impedance increased abruptly for many individuals exhibiting precipitous hearing loss; the increase was often transient. The impedance increases were significantly larger than the impedance changes observed for individuals with stable or symmetrical hearing loss. Moreover, the impedance changes were associated with changes in behavioral thresholds for individuals with a precipitous drop in behavioral thresholds. These findings suggest a change in the electrode environment coincident with the change in auditory status. Changes in ECAP thresholds, growth function slopes, and suprathreshold amplitudes were not correlated with changes in behavioral thresholds, suggesting that neural responsiveness in the region excited by the implant is relatively stable. Further exploration into etiology of delayed-onset hearing loss post implantation is needed, with particular interest in mechanisms associated with changes in the intracochlear environment.

KW - Cochlear implant

KW - Electrically evoked compound action potential

KW - Electrode impedance

KW - Hearing preservation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017591028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.heares.2017.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.heares.2017.04.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 28432874

AN - SCOPUS:85017591028

VL - 350

SP - 45

EP - 57

JO - Hearing Research

JF - Hearing Research

SN - 0378-5955

ER -