Developing secondary prospective teachers’ ability to respond to student work

Debra Monson, Erin Krupa, Kristin Lesseig, Stephanie Casey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper highlights the second phase of a multi-university research project focusing on improving secondary prospective mathematics teachers’ abilities to respond to student thinking. This work is based on an Interview Module, created by the authors, which showed gains in prospective teachers’ (PSTs) abilities to attend to and interpret student thinking but did not show the same gains in their abilities to respond to student thinking. The Interview Module originally included a pre–post-video, readings, discussion, and one-on-one interview with a secondary student (Lesseig et al. in Math Teach Educ 5(1):29–46, 2016). This second phase adds a take-home assignment based on solutions from the secondary students who were interviewed in Phase 1. This take-home assignment was designed to specifically improve PSTs’ abilities to respond to student thinking. Results indicate that gains were made in their ability to respond, as was intended, but, unexpectedly, greater gains were also found in their abilities to attend to and interpret student thinking compared with Phase 1.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Mathematics Teacher Education
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Prospective Teachers
ability
teacher
Assignment
student
Module
interview
university research
research project
video
mathematics

Keywords

  • Analyzing student work
  • Interviewing
  • Professional noticing
  • Prospective teachers
  • Responding

Cite this

Monson, Debra ; Krupa, Erin ; Lesseig, Kristin ; Casey, Stephanie. / Developing secondary prospective teachers’ ability to respond to student work. In: Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 2018.
@article{d408b8a439d5478cba61e63e41118384,
title = "Developing secondary prospective teachers’ ability to respond to student work",
abstract = "This paper highlights the second phase of a multi-university research project focusing on improving secondary prospective mathematics teachers’ abilities to respond to student thinking. This work is based on an Interview Module, created by the authors, which showed gains in prospective teachers’ (PSTs) abilities to attend to and interpret student thinking but did not show the same gains in their abilities to respond to student thinking. The Interview Module originally included a pre–post-video, readings, discussion, and one-on-one interview with a secondary student (Lesseig et al. in Math Teach Educ 5(1):29–46, 2016). This second phase adds a take-home assignment based on solutions from the secondary students who were interviewed in Phase 1. This take-home assignment was designed to specifically improve PSTs’ abilities to respond to student thinking. Results indicate that gains were made in their ability to respond, as was intended, but, unexpectedly, greater gains were also found in their abilities to attend to and interpret student thinking compared with Phase 1.",
keywords = "Analyzing student work, Interviewing, Professional noticing, Prospective teachers, Responding",
author = "Debra Monson and Erin Krupa and Kristin Lesseig and Stephanie Casey",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10857-018-9420-8",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education",
issn = "1386-4416",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

Developing secondary prospective teachers’ ability to respond to student work. / Monson, Debra; Krupa, Erin; Lesseig, Kristin; Casey, Stephanie.

In: Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing secondary prospective teachers’ ability to respond to student work

AU - Monson, Debra

AU - Krupa, Erin

AU - Lesseig, Kristin

AU - Casey, Stephanie

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This paper highlights the second phase of a multi-university research project focusing on improving secondary prospective mathematics teachers’ abilities to respond to student thinking. This work is based on an Interview Module, created by the authors, which showed gains in prospective teachers’ (PSTs) abilities to attend to and interpret student thinking but did not show the same gains in their abilities to respond to student thinking. The Interview Module originally included a pre–post-video, readings, discussion, and one-on-one interview with a secondary student (Lesseig et al. in Math Teach Educ 5(1):29–46, 2016). This second phase adds a take-home assignment based on solutions from the secondary students who were interviewed in Phase 1. This take-home assignment was designed to specifically improve PSTs’ abilities to respond to student thinking. Results indicate that gains were made in their ability to respond, as was intended, but, unexpectedly, greater gains were also found in their abilities to attend to and interpret student thinking compared with Phase 1.

AB - This paper highlights the second phase of a multi-university research project focusing on improving secondary prospective mathematics teachers’ abilities to respond to student thinking. This work is based on an Interview Module, created by the authors, which showed gains in prospective teachers’ (PSTs) abilities to attend to and interpret student thinking but did not show the same gains in their abilities to respond to student thinking. The Interview Module originally included a pre–post-video, readings, discussion, and one-on-one interview with a secondary student (Lesseig et al. in Math Teach Educ 5(1):29–46, 2016). This second phase adds a take-home assignment based on solutions from the secondary students who were interviewed in Phase 1. This take-home assignment was designed to specifically improve PSTs’ abilities to respond to student thinking. Results indicate that gains were made in their ability to respond, as was intended, but, unexpectedly, greater gains were also found in their abilities to attend to and interpret student thinking compared with Phase 1.

KW - Analyzing student work

KW - Interviewing

KW - Professional noticing

KW - Prospective teachers

KW - Responding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056360083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10857-018-9420-8

DO - 10.1007/s10857-018-9420-8

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

JF - Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

SN - 1386-4416

ER -