Diagnostic problem solving in male collegiate athletic trainers

Fredrick A. Gardin, James M. Mensch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: Knowledge and experience may be important factors for understanding expertise based upon a clinician's ability to select and execute an appropriate response as a clinician during injury evaluation.

Objective: To describe how collegiate male certified athletic trainers represent injury-evaluation domain knowledge during a situational interview using a think-aloud protocol.

Design: Qualitative.

Setting: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I and II colleges in National Athletic Trainers' Association District 3.

Patients or Other Participants: A total of 20 male certified athletic trainers (n = 10 with less than 2 years of experience in the college setting and n = 10 with at least 10 years of experience in the college setting) participated in the study.

Data Collection and Analysis: We collected data using a situational interview and questionnaire. Data were transcribed, reduced to meaningful units, and analyzed using verbal analysis procedures. Member checks, triangulation of data, field journaling, and peer-debriefing techniques were used to ensure trustworthiness of the data. Knowledge concepts were enumerated to describe differences between experts and novices.

Results: Compared with novices, experts had more knowledge concepts of patient history and predictions and fewer concepts of situation appraisal.

Conclusions: Expertise in athletic training shares traits with other areas in health care. Athletic training education and professional development may benefit from our understanding which cognitive processes differentiate expert practice. Future investigators should attempt to describe other settings and study diagnostic problem solving in a natural environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)521-531
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Athletic Training
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Sports
Interviews
Professional Education
Aptitude
Wounds and Injuries
Research Personnel
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Expertise
  • Professional development
  • Qualitative research

Cite this

@article{ca6f098a301d4417ae410d77e8fc42c0,
title = "Diagnostic problem solving in male collegiate athletic trainers",
abstract = "Context: Knowledge and experience may be important factors for understanding expertise based upon a clinician's ability to select and execute an appropriate response as a clinician during injury evaluation.Objective: To describe how collegiate male certified athletic trainers represent injury-evaluation domain knowledge during a situational interview using a think-aloud protocol.Design: Qualitative.Setting: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I and II colleges in National Athletic Trainers' Association District 3.Patients or Other Participants: A total of 20 male certified athletic trainers (n = 10 with less than 2 years of experience in the college setting and n = 10 with at least 10 years of experience in the college setting) participated in the study.Data Collection and Analysis: We collected data using a situational interview and questionnaire. Data were transcribed, reduced to meaningful units, and analyzed using verbal analysis procedures. Member checks, triangulation of data, field journaling, and peer-debriefing techniques were used to ensure trustworthiness of the data. Knowledge concepts were enumerated to describe differences between experts and novices.Results: Compared with novices, experts had more knowledge concepts of patient history and predictions and fewer concepts of situation appraisal.Conclusions: Expertise in athletic training shares traits with other areas in health care. Athletic training education and professional development may benefit from our understanding which cognitive processes differentiate expert practice. Future investigators should attempt to describe other settings and study diagnostic problem solving in a natural environment.",
keywords = "Expertise, Professional development, Qualitative research",
author = "Gardin, {Fredrick A.} and Mensch, {James M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.04",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "521--531",
journal = "Journal of Athletic Training",
issn = "1062-6050",
publisher = "National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Diagnostic problem solving in male collegiate athletic trainers. / Gardin, Fredrick A.; Mensch, James M.

In: Journal of Athletic Training, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.07.2014, p. 521-531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic problem solving in male collegiate athletic trainers

AU - Gardin, Fredrick A.

AU - Mensch, James M.

PY - 2014/7/1

Y1 - 2014/7/1

N2 - Context: Knowledge and experience may be important factors for understanding expertise based upon a clinician's ability to select and execute an appropriate response as a clinician during injury evaluation.Objective: To describe how collegiate male certified athletic trainers represent injury-evaluation domain knowledge during a situational interview using a think-aloud protocol.Design: Qualitative.Setting: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I and II colleges in National Athletic Trainers' Association District 3.Patients or Other Participants: A total of 20 male certified athletic trainers (n = 10 with less than 2 years of experience in the college setting and n = 10 with at least 10 years of experience in the college setting) participated in the study.Data Collection and Analysis: We collected data using a situational interview and questionnaire. Data were transcribed, reduced to meaningful units, and analyzed using verbal analysis procedures. Member checks, triangulation of data, field journaling, and peer-debriefing techniques were used to ensure trustworthiness of the data. Knowledge concepts were enumerated to describe differences between experts and novices.Results: Compared with novices, experts had more knowledge concepts of patient history and predictions and fewer concepts of situation appraisal.Conclusions: Expertise in athletic training shares traits with other areas in health care. Athletic training education and professional development may benefit from our understanding which cognitive processes differentiate expert practice. Future investigators should attempt to describe other settings and study diagnostic problem solving in a natural environment.

AB - Context: Knowledge and experience may be important factors for understanding expertise based upon a clinician's ability to select and execute an appropriate response as a clinician during injury evaluation.Objective: To describe how collegiate male certified athletic trainers represent injury-evaluation domain knowledge during a situational interview using a think-aloud protocol.Design: Qualitative.Setting: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I and II colleges in National Athletic Trainers' Association District 3.Patients or Other Participants: A total of 20 male certified athletic trainers (n = 10 with less than 2 years of experience in the college setting and n = 10 with at least 10 years of experience in the college setting) participated in the study.Data Collection and Analysis: We collected data using a situational interview and questionnaire. Data were transcribed, reduced to meaningful units, and analyzed using verbal analysis procedures. Member checks, triangulation of data, field journaling, and peer-debriefing techniques were used to ensure trustworthiness of the data. Knowledge concepts were enumerated to describe differences between experts and novices.Results: Compared with novices, experts had more knowledge concepts of patient history and predictions and fewer concepts of situation appraisal.Conclusions: Expertise in athletic training shares traits with other areas in health care. Athletic training education and professional development may benefit from our understanding which cognitive processes differentiate expert practice. Future investigators should attempt to describe other settings and study diagnostic problem solving in a natural environment.

KW - Expertise

KW - Professional development

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908569149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.04

DO - 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.04

M3 - Article

C2 - 24972043

AN - SCOPUS:84908569149

VL - 49

SP - 521

EP - 531

JO - Journal of Athletic Training

JF - Journal of Athletic Training

SN - 1062-6050

IS - 4

ER -