Digging deeper or piling it higher? Implicit measurement in organizational behavior and human resource management

Elizabeth L. Haines, Kenneth Sumner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Organizational researchers can dig deeper into peoples' thoughts, attitudes, and self-concepts to understand how automatic processes may impact judgment and social behavior in organizations. Measures of these automatic processes, including the Implicit Association Test (e.g., IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), Semantic Priming (e.g., SP; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 1997), Affect Misattribution Procedure (e.g., & Payne, Cheng, Govorun, & Stewart, 2005), Word Completion Tasks (e.g., WCT; Johnson & Saboe, 2011), among many others, deserve greater attention as alternatives or supplements to traditional self-report measures of variables important in organizations (e.g., job satisfaction, personality and trait measurement, diversity attitudes). In this paper, we first provide a primer on implicit social cognition and its relationship to automatic and controlled cognitive processes, discussing major types of implicit measures, how these might operate, criticisms of this approach, and how these implicit constructs may give rise to behavior in organizations. Second, we discuss models of automatic processes and explore their validity and how these may predict behavior. Third, we offer advice for selecting, constructing, and improving implicit measurements when used in organizational research to enhance human resources and organizational functioning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-241
Number of pages13
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Process Assessment (Health Care)
Job Satisfaction
Social Behavior
Semantics
Self Concept
Self Report
Cognition
Personality
Research Personnel
Research
Human resource management
Organizational behaviour
Self-concept
Job satisfaction
Priming
Criticism
Self-report
Organizational research
Functioning
Human resources

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Automatic and controlled process in organizations
  • Implicit measurement
  • Stereotypes and prejudices in organizations

Cite this

@article{5ae1ba53f2ec49e6980a7fdb7181beae,
title = "Digging deeper or piling it higher? Implicit measurement in organizational behavior and human resource management",
abstract = "Organizational researchers can dig deeper into peoples' thoughts, attitudes, and self-concepts to understand how automatic processes may impact judgment and social behavior in organizations. Measures of these automatic processes, including the Implicit Association Test (e.g., IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), Semantic Priming (e.g., SP; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 1997), Affect Misattribution Procedure (e.g., & Payne, Cheng, Govorun, & Stewart, 2005), Word Completion Tasks (e.g., WCT; Johnson & Saboe, 2011), among many others, deserve greater attention as alternatives or supplements to traditional self-report measures of variables important in organizations (e.g., job satisfaction, personality and trait measurement, diversity attitudes). In this paper, we first provide a primer on implicit social cognition and its relationship to automatic and controlled cognitive processes, discussing major types of implicit measures, how these might operate, criticisms of this approach, and how these implicit constructs may give rise to behavior in organizations. Second, we discuss models of automatic processes and explore their validity and how these may predict behavior. Third, we offer advice for selecting, constructing, and improving implicit measurements when used in organizational research to enhance human resources and organizational functioning.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Automatic and controlled process in organizations, Implicit measurement, Stereotypes and prejudices in organizations",
author = "Haines, {Elizabeth L.} and Kenneth Sumner",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.12.004",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "229--241",
journal = "Human Resource Management Review",
issn = "1053-4822",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Digging deeper or piling it higher? Implicit measurement in organizational behavior and human resource management. / Haines, Elizabeth L.; Sumner, Kenneth.

In: Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 229-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digging deeper or piling it higher? Implicit measurement in organizational behavior and human resource management

AU - Haines, Elizabeth L.

AU - Sumner, Kenneth

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Organizational researchers can dig deeper into peoples' thoughts, attitudes, and self-concepts to understand how automatic processes may impact judgment and social behavior in organizations. Measures of these automatic processes, including the Implicit Association Test (e.g., IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), Semantic Priming (e.g., SP; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 1997), Affect Misattribution Procedure (e.g., & Payne, Cheng, Govorun, & Stewart, 2005), Word Completion Tasks (e.g., WCT; Johnson & Saboe, 2011), among many others, deserve greater attention as alternatives or supplements to traditional self-report measures of variables important in organizations (e.g., job satisfaction, personality and trait measurement, diversity attitudes). In this paper, we first provide a primer on implicit social cognition and its relationship to automatic and controlled cognitive processes, discussing major types of implicit measures, how these might operate, criticisms of this approach, and how these implicit constructs may give rise to behavior in organizations. Second, we discuss models of automatic processes and explore their validity and how these may predict behavior. Third, we offer advice for selecting, constructing, and improving implicit measurements when used in organizational research to enhance human resources and organizational functioning.

AB - Organizational researchers can dig deeper into peoples' thoughts, attitudes, and self-concepts to understand how automatic processes may impact judgment and social behavior in organizations. Measures of these automatic processes, including the Implicit Association Test (e.g., IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), Semantic Priming (e.g., SP; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 1997), Affect Misattribution Procedure (e.g., & Payne, Cheng, Govorun, & Stewart, 2005), Word Completion Tasks (e.g., WCT; Johnson & Saboe, 2011), among many others, deserve greater attention as alternatives or supplements to traditional self-report measures of variables important in organizations (e.g., job satisfaction, personality and trait measurement, diversity attitudes). In this paper, we first provide a primer on implicit social cognition and its relationship to automatic and controlled cognitive processes, discussing major types of implicit measures, how these might operate, criticisms of this approach, and how these implicit constructs may give rise to behavior in organizations. Second, we discuss models of automatic processes and explore their validity and how these may predict behavior. Third, we offer advice for selecting, constructing, and improving implicit measurements when used in organizational research to enhance human resources and organizational functioning.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Automatic and controlled process in organizations

KW - Implicit measurement

KW - Stereotypes and prejudices in organizations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877589958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.12.004

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 229

EP - 241

JO - Human Resource Management Review

JF - Human Resource Management Review

SN - 1053-4822

IS - 3

ER -