Disentangling How Coworkers and Supervisors Influence Employee Cyberloafing

What Normative Information Are Employees Attending To?

Kevin Askew, Alexandra Ilie, Jeremy A. Bauer, Daniel Simonet, John E. Buckner, Thomas A. Robertson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Cyberloafing—the use of an electronic device at work for an activity that an immediate supervisor would not consider work-related—is now the most common way that employees waste time at work. It is well established that social norms play a role in cyberloafing, but it is unknown what specific normative information employees attend to when deciding whether or not to cyberloaf. In Study 1, we tested which of four types of normative information could underlie the observed correlation between social norms and cyberloafing. We found that both perceptions of supervisor cyberloafing and perceptions of coworker cyberloafing accounted for unique variance in cyberloafing, and also discovered some evidence that the approval of these referents also had the same effect. In Study 2, we cross-validated these results from Study 1 using a sample that was reasonably representative of the general working population—supporting the generalizability of our findings from Study 1. Furthermore, we conducted supplemental analyses (relative weights analysis and polynomial regression) to untangle nuances in how normative data relates to cyberloafing. In Study 1, we also examined the role of actual norms—as opposed to perceived norms—and found evidence that actual supervisor cyberloafing does influence cyberloafing through employee perceptions of supervisor cyberloafing. Overall, this investigation serves to clarify how social influence plays a role in the cyberloafing phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Leadership and Organizational Studies
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

co-worker
employee
Social Norms
evidence
electronics
regression
Supervisors
Employees
Social norms

Keywords

  • coworkers
  • cyberloafing
  • non–work-related computing
  • NWRC
  • social norms
  • supervisors

Cite this

@article{53ab5ab0b49f406d9127dcd0804b2376,
title = "Disentangling How Coworkers and Supervisors Influence Employee Cyberloafing: What Normative Information Are Employees Attending To?",
abstract = "Cyberloafing—the use of an electronic device at work for an activity that an immediate supervisor would not consider work-related—is now the most common way that employees waste time at work. It is well established that social norms play a role in cyberloafing, but it is unknown what specific normative information employees attend to when deciding whether or not to cyberloaf. In Study 1, we tested which of four types of normative information could underlie the observed correlation between social norms and cyberloafing. We found that both perceptions of supervisor cyberloafing and perceptions of coworker cyberloafing accounted for unique variance in cyberloafing, and also discovered some evidence that the approval of these referents also had the same effect. In Study 2, we cross-validated these results from Study 1 using a sample that was reasonably representative of the general working population—supporting the generalizability of our findings from Study 1. Furthermore, we conducted supplemental analyses (relative weights analysis and polynomial regression) to untangle nuances in how normative data relates to cyberloafing. In Study 1, we also examined the role of actual norms—as opposed to perceived norms—and found evidence that actual supervisor cyberloafing does influence cyberloafing through employee perceptions of supervisor cyberloafing. Overall, this investigation serves to clarify how social influence plays a role in the cyberloafing phenomenon.",
keywords = "coworkers, cyberloafing, non–work-related computing, NWRC, social norms, supervisors",
author = "Kevin Askew and Alexandra Ilie and Bauer, {Jeremy A.} and Daniel Simonet and Buckner, {John E.} and Robertson, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1548051818813091",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies",
issn = "1548-0518",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

Disentangling How Coworkers and Supervisors Influence Employee Cyberloafing : What Normative Information Are Employees Attending To? / Askew, Kevin; Ilie, Alexandra; Bauer, Jeremy A.; Simonet, Daniel; Buckner, John E.; Robertson, Thomas A.

In: Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling How Coworkers and Supervisors Influence Employee Cyberloafing

T2 - What Normative Information Are Employees Attending To?

AU - Askew, Kevin

AU - Ilie, Alexandra

AU - Bauer, Jeremy A.

AU - Simonet, Daniel

AU - Buckner, John E.

AU - Robertson, Thomas A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Cyberloafing—the use of an electronic device at work for an activity that an immediate supervisor would not consider work-related—is now the most common way that employees waste time at work. It is well established that social norms play a role in cyberloafing, but it is unknown what specific normative information employees attend to when deciding whether or not to cyberloaf. In Study 1, we tested which of four types of normative information could underlie the observed correlation between social norms and cyberloafing. We found that both perceptions of supervisor cyberloafing and perceptions of coworker cyberloafing accounted for unique variance in cyberloafing, and also discovered some evidence that the approval of these referents also had the same effect. In Study 2, we cross-validated these results from Study 1 using a sample that was reasonably representative of the general working population—supporting the generalizability of our findings from Study 1. Furthermore, we conducted supplemental analyses (relative weights analysis and polynomial regression) to untangle nuances in how normative data relates to cyberloafing. In Study 1, we also examined the role of actual norms—as opposed to perceived norms—and found evidence that actual supervisor cyberloafing does influence cyberloafing through employee perceptions of supervisor cyberloafing. Overall, this investigation serves to clarify how social influence plays a role in the cyberloafing phenomenon.

AB - Cyberloafing—the use of an electronic device at work for an activity that an immediate supervisor would not consider work-related—is now the most common way that employees waste time at work. It is well established that social norms play a role in cyberloafing, but it is unknown what specific normative information employees attend to when deciding whether or not to cyberloaf. In Study 1, we tested which of four types of normative information could underlie the observed correlation between social norms and cyberloafing. We found that both perceptions of supervisor cyberloafing and perceptions of coworker cyberloafing accounted for unique variance in cyberloafing, and also discovered some evidence that the approval of these referents also had the same effect. In Study 2, we cross-validated these results from Study 1 using a sample that was reasonably representative of the general working population—supporting the generalizability of our findings from Study 1. Furthermore, we conducted supplemental analyses (relative weights analysis and polynomial regression) to untangle nuances in how normative data relates to cyberloafing. In Study 1, we also examined the role of actual norms—as opposed to perceived norms—and found evidence that actual supervisor cyberloafing does influence cyberloafing through employee perceptions of supervisor cyberloafing. Overall, this investigation serves to clarify how social influence plays a role in the cyberloafing phenomenon.

KW - coworkers

KW - cyberloafing

KW - non–work-related computing

KW - NWRC

KW - social norms

KW - supervisors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058841550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1548051818813091

DO - 10.1177/1548051818813091

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies

JF - Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies

SN - 1548-0518

ER -